Assessing the efficiency and significance of Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) assays in using <it>in vitro </it>methylated genomic DNA

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>DNA methylation contributes to the regulation of gene expression during development and cellular differentiation. The recently developed Methylated DNA ImmunoPrecipitation (MeDIP) assay allows a comprehensive analysis of this epigene...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jia Jinsong, Pekowska Aleksandra, Jaeger Sebastien, Benoukraf Touati, Ferrier Pierre, Spicuglia Salvatore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-09-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/3/240
id doaj-e61324df38374336b354fd9874efa379
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e61324df38374336b354fd9874efa3792020-11-25T01:45:00ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002010-09-013124010.1186/1756-0500-3-240Assessing the efficiency and significance of Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) assays in using <it>in vitro </it>methylated genomic DNAJia JinsongPekowska AleksandraJaeger SebastienBenoukraf TouatiFerrier PierreSpicuglia Salvatore<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>DNA methylation contributes to the regulation of gene expression during development and cellular differentiation. The recently developed Methylated DNA ImmunoPrecipitation (MeDIP) assay allows a comprehensive analysis of this epigenetic mark at the genomic level in normal and disease-derived cells. However, estimating the efficiency of the MeDIP technique is difficult without previous knowledge of the methylation status of a given cell population. Attempts to circumvent this problem have involved the use of <it>in vitro </it>methylated DNA in parallel to the investigated samples. Taking advantage of this stratagem, we sought to improve the sensitivity of the approach and to assess potential biases resulting from DNA amplification and hybridization procedures using MeDIP samples.</p> <p>Findings</p> <p>We performed MeDIP assays using <it>in vitro </it>methylated DNA, with or without previous DNA amplification, and hybridization to a human promoter array. We observed that CpG content at gene promoters indeed correlates strongly with the MeDIP signal obtained using <it>in vitro </it>methylated DNA, even when lowering significantly the amount of starting material. In analyzing MeDIP products that were subjected to whole genome amplification (WGA), we also revealed a strong bias against CpG-rich promoters during this amplification procedure, which may potentially affect the significance of the resulting data.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We illustrate the use of <it>in vitro </it>methylated DNA to assess the efficiency and accuracy of MeDIP procedures. We report that efficient and reproducible genome-wide data can be obtained via MeDIP experiments using relatively low amount of starting genomic DNA; and emphasize for the precaution that must be taken in data analysis when an additional DNA amplification step is required.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/3/240
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jia Jinsong
Pekowska Aleksandra
Jaeger Sebastien
Benoukraf Touati
Ferrier Pierre
Spicuglia Salvatore
spellingShingle Jia Jinsong
Pekowska Aleksandra
Jaeger Sebastien
Benoukraf Touati
Ferrier Pierre
Spicuglia Salvatore
Assessing the efficiency and significance of Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) assays in using <it>in vitro </it>methylated genomic DNA
BMC Research Notes
author_facet Jia Jinsong
Pekowska Aleksandra
Jaeger Sebastien
Benoukraf Touati
Ferrier Pierre
Spicuglia Salvatore
author_sort Jia Jinsong
title Assessing the efficiency and significance of Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) assays in using <it>in vitro </it>methylated genomic DNA
title_short Assessing the efficiency and significance of Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) assays in using <it>in vitro </it>methylated genomic DNA
title_full Assessing the efficiency and significance of Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) assays in using <it>in vitro </it>methylated genomic DNA
title_fullStr Assessing the efficiency and significance of Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) assays in using <it>in vitro </it>methylated genomic DNA
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the efficiency and significance of Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) assays in using <it>in vitro </it>methylated genomic DNA
title_sort assessing the efficiency and significance of methylated dna immunoprecipitation (medip) assays in using <it>in vitro </it>methylated genomic dna
publisher BMC
series BMC Research Notes
issn 1756-0500
publishDate 2010-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>DNA methylation contributes to the regulation of gene expression during development and cellular differentiation. The recently developed Methylated DNA ImmunoPrecipitation (MeDIP) assay allows a comprehensive analysis of this epigenetic mark at the genomic level in normal and disease-derived cells. However, estimating the efficiency of the MeDIP technique is difficult without previous knowledge of the methylation status of a given cell population. Attempts to circumvent this problem have involved the use of <it>in vitro </it>methylated DNA in parallel to the investigated samples. Taking advantage of this stratagem, we sought to improve the sensitivity of the approach and to assess potential biases resulting from DNA amplification and hybridization procedures using MeDIP samples.</p> <p>Findings</p> <p>We performed MeDIP assays using <it>in vitro </it>methylated DNA, with or without previous DNA amplification, and hybridization to a human promoter array. We observed that CpG content at gene promoters indeed correlates strongly with the MeDIP signal obtained using <it>in vitro </it>methylated DNA, even when lowering significantly the amount of starting material. In analyzing MeDIP products that were subjected to whole genome amplification (WGA), we also revealed a strong bias against CpG-rich promoters during this amplification procedure, which may potentially affect the significance of the resulting data.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We illustrate the use of <it>in vitro </it>methylated DNA to assess the efficiency and accuracy of MeDIP procedures. We report that efficient and reproducible genome-wide data can be obtained via MeDIP experiments using relatively low amount of starting genomic DNA; and emphasize for the precaution that must be taken in data analysis when an additional DNA amplification step is required.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1756-0500/3/240
work_keys_str_mv AT jiajinsong assessingtheefficiencyandsignificanceofmethylateddnaimmunoprecipitationmedipassaysinusingitinvitroitmethylatedgenomicdna
AT pekowskaaleksandra assessingtheefficiencyandsignificanceofmethylateddnaimmunoprecipitationmedipassaysinusingitinvitroitmethylatedgenomicdna
AT jaegersebastien assessingtheefficiencyandsignificanceofmethylateddnaimmunoprecipitationmedipassaysinusingitinvitroitmethylatedgenomicdna
AT benoukraftouati assessingtheefficiencyandsignificanceofmethylateddnaimmunoprecipitationmedipassaysinusingitinvitroitmethylatedgenomicdna
AT ferrierpierre assessingtheefficiencyandsignificanceofmethylateddnaimmunoprecipitationmedipassaysinusingitinvitroitmethylatedgenomicdna
AT spicugliasalvatore assessingtheefficiencyandsignificanceofmethylateddnaimmunoprecipitationmedipassaysinusingitinvitroitmethylatedgenomicdna
_version_ 1725025834320789504