Methods of induction of labor and women’s experience: a population-based cohort study with mediation analyses

Abstract Background Negative childbirth experience may affect mother wellbeing and health. However, it is rarely evaluated in studies comparing methods of induction of labor (IoL). Aim To compare women’s experience of IoL according to the method, considering the mediating role of interventions and c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pauline Blanc-Petitjean, Corinne Dupont, Bruno Carbonne, Marina Salomé, François Goffinet, Camille Le Ray, for the MEDIP study group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-09-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04076-x
id doaj-e62bf2523e184a959309ee476357e3aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e62bf2523e184a959309ee476357e3aa2021-09-19T11:46:00ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932021-09-012111910.1186/s12884-021-04076-xMethods of induction of labor and women’s experience: a population-based cohort study with mediation analysesPauline Blanc-Petitjean0Corinne Dupont1Bruno Carbonne2Marina Salomé3François Goffinet4Camille Le Ray5for the MEDIP study groupUniversité de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRARéseau périnatal Aurore - Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Université Lyon 1, HESPER EA 7425 Health Services and Performance ResearchDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Princess Grace HospitalAP-HP, URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker/CochinUniversité de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRAUniversité de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRAAbstract Background Negative childbirth experience may affect mother wellbeing and health. However, it is rarely evaluated in studies comparing methods of induction of labor (IoL). Aim To compare women’s experience of IoL according to the method, considering the mediating role of interventions and complications of delivery. Methods We used data from the MEDIP prospective population-based cohort, including all women with IoL during one month in seven French perinatal networks. The experience of IoL, assessed at 2 months postpartum, was first compared between cervical ripening and oxytocin, and secondarily between different cervical ripening methods. Mediation analyses were used to measure the direct and indirect effects of cervical ripening on maternal experience, through delivery with interventions or complications. Findings The response rate was 47.8% (n = 1453/3042). Compared with oxytocin (n = 541), cervical ripening (n = 910) was associated less often with feelings that labor went ‘as expected’ (adjusted risk ratio for the direct effect 0.78, 95%CI [0.70–0.88]), length of labor was ‘acceptable’ (0.76[0.71–0.82]), ‘vaginal discomfort’ was absent (0.77[0.69–0.85]) and with lower global satisfaction (0.90[0.84–0.96]). Interventions and complications mediated between 6 and 35% of the total effect of cervical ripening on maternal experience. Compared to the dinoprostone insert, maternal experience was not significantly different with the other prostaglandins. The balloon catheter was associated with less pain. Discussion Cervical ripening was associated with a less positive experience of childbirth, whatever the method, only partly explained by interventions and complications of delivery. Conclusion Counselling and support of women requiring cervical ripening might be enhanced to improve the experience of IoL.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04076-xInduction of laborCervical ripeningMaternal experience, midwifery research, causal mediation analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pauline Blanc-Petitjean
Corinne Dupont
Bruno Carbonne
Marina Salomé
François Goffinet
Camille Le Ray
for the MEDIP study group
spellingShingle Pauline Blanc-Petitjean
Corinne Dupont
Bruno Carbonne
Marina Salomé
François Goffinet
Camille Le Ray
for the MEDIP study group
Methods of induction of labor and women’s experience: a population-based cohort study with mediation analyses
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Induction of labor
Cervical ripening
Maternal experience, midwifery research, causal mediation analysis
author_facet Pauline Blanc-Petitjean
Corinne Dupont
Bruno Carbonne
Marina Salomé
François Goffinet
Camille Le Ray
for the MEDIP study group
author_sort Pauline Blanc-Petitjean
title Methods of induction of labor and women’s experience: a population-based cohort study with mediation analyses
title_short Methods of induction of labor and women’s experience: a population-based cohort study with mediation analyses
title_full Methods of induction of labor and women’s experience: a population-based cohort study with mediation analyses
title_fullStr Methods of induction of labor and women’s experience: a population-based cohort study with mediation analyses
title_full_unstemmed Methods of induction of labor and women’s experience: a population-based cohort study with mediation analyses
title_sort methods of induction of labor and women’s experience: a population-based cohort study with mediation analyses
publisher BMC
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
issn 1471-2393
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Background Negative childbirth experience may affect mother wellbeing and health. However, it is rarely evaluated in studies comparing methods of induction of labor (IoL). Aim To compare women’s experience of IoL according to the method, considering the mediating role of interventions and complications of delivery. Methods We used data from the MEDIP prospective population-based cohort, including all women with IoL during one month in seven French perinatal networks. The experience of IoL, assessed at 2 months postpartum, was first compared between cervical ripening and oxytocin, and secondarily between different cervical ripening methods. Mediation analyses were used to measure the direct and indirect effects of cervical ripening on maternal experience, through delivery with interventions or complications. Findings The response rate was 47.8% (n = 1453/3042). Compared with oxytocin (n = 541), cervical ripening (n = 910) was associated less often with feelings that labor went ‘as expected’ (adjusted risk ratio for the direct effect 0.78, 95%CI [0.70–0.88]), length of labor was ‘acceptable’ (0.76[0.71–0.82]), ‘vaginal discomfort’ was absent (0.77[0.69–0.85]) and with lower global satisfaction (0.90[0.84–0.96]). Interventions and complications mediated between 6 and 35% of the total effect of cervical ripening on maternal experience. Compared to the dinoprostone insert, maternal experience was not significantly different with the other prostaglandins. The balloon catheter was associated with less pain. Discussion Cervical ripening was associated with a less positive experience of childbirth, whatever the method, only partly explained by interventions and complications of delivery. Conclusion Counselling and support of women requiring cervical ripening might be enhanced to improve the experience of IoL.
topic Induction of labor
Cervical ripening
Maternal experience, midwifery research, causal mediation analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04076-x
work_keys_str_mv AT paulineblancpetitjean methodsofinductionoflaborandwomensexperienceapopulationbasedcohortstudywithmediationanalyses
AT corinnedupont methodsofinductionoflaborandwomensexperienceapopulationbasedcohortstudywithmediationanalyses
AT brunocarbonne methodsofinductionoflaborandwomensexperienceapopulationbasedcohortstudywithmediationanalyses
AT marinasalome methodsofinductionoflaborandwomensexperienceapopulationbasedcohortstudywithmediationanalyses
AT francoisgoffinet methodsofinductionoflaborandwomensexperienceapopulationbasedcohortstudywithmediationanalyses
AT camilleleray methodsofinductionoflaborandwomensexperienceapopulationbasedcohortstudywithmediationanalyses
AT forthemedipstudygroup methodsofinductionoflaborandwomensexperienceapopulationbasedcohortstudywithmediationanalyses
_version_ 1717375553250525184