A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> (CRAB), an important nosocomial pathogen, occurs particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU). Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of documented treatment with colistin monotherapy versus colistin plus me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wasan Katip, Suriyon Uitrakul, Peninnah Oberdorfer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Antibiotics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/10/647
id doaj-e64017d24c99497996bf00678e88ad40
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e64017d24c99497996bf00678e88ad402020-11-25T03:20:03ZengMDPI AGAntibiotics2079-63822020-09-01964764710.3390/antibiotics9100647A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched AnalysisWasan Katip0Suriyon Uitrakul1Peninnah Oberdorfer2Department of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, ThailandDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, School of Pharmacy, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, ThailandEpidemiology Research Group of Infectious Disease (ERGID), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, ThailandCarbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> (CRAB), an important nosocomial pathogen, occurs particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU). Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of documented treatment with colistin monotherapy versus colistin plus meropenem in critically ill patients with CRAB infections at Chiang Mai University Hospital (CMUH). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients with CRAB infections in an ICU from 2015 to 2017, who received colistin monotherapy versus colistin plus meropenem. After propensity score matching, an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of a 30-day mortality rate in patients who received colistin plus meropenem was 0.43 compared to those who received colistin monotherapy (95% CI, 0.23–0.82, <i>p</i> = 0.01). aORs of clinical response and microbiological response were also higher in patients who received colistin plus meropenem (1.81, 95% CI 1.01–3.26, <i>p</i> = 0.048 and 2.08, 95% CI 1.11–3.91, <i>p</i> = 0.023, respectively). There was no significant difference in nephrotoxicity (aOR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.43–1.36, <i>p</i> = 0.363) between colistin monotherapy and colistin plus meropenem. In conclusion, the addition of meropenem to colistin caused a reduction in 30-day mortality, higher clinical and microbiological responses, and did not increase nephrotoxicity compared to colistin monotherapy. Furthermore, 30-day mortality was significantly related with age, receiving vasopressor, having malignancy, and the APACHE II score.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/10/647critically ill patientscombination therapycolistinmeropenemcarbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wasan Katip
Suriyon Uitrakul
Peninnah Oberdorfer
spellingShingle Wasan Katip
Suriyon Uitrakul
Peninnah Oberdorfer
A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Antibiotics
critically ill patients
combination therapy
colistin
meropenem
carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>
author_facet Wasan Katip
Suriyon Uitrakul
Peninnah Oberdorfer
author_sort Wasan Katip
title A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
title_short A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
title_full A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
title_fullStr A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
title_sort comparison of colistin versus colistin plus meropenem for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant <i>acinetobacter baumannii</i> in critically ill patients: a propensity score-matched analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series Antibiotics
issn 2079-6382
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> (CRAB), an important nosocomial pathogen, occurs particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU). Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of documented treatment with colistin monotherapy versus colistin plus meropenem in critically ill patients with CRAB infections at Chiang Mai University Hospital (CMUH). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients with CRAB infections in an ICU from 2015 to 2017, who received colistin monotherapy versus colistin plus meropenem. After propensity score matching, an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of a 30-day mortality rate in patients who received colistin plus meropenem was 0.43 compared to those who received colistin monotherapy (95% CI, 0.23–0.82, <i>p</i> = 0.01). aORs of clinical response and microbiological response were also higher in patients who received colistin plus meropenem (1.81, 95% CI 1.01–3.26, <i>p</i> = 0.048 and 2.08, 95% CI 1.11–3.91, <i>p</i> = 0.023, respectively). There was no significant difference in nephrotoxicity (aOR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.43–1.36, <i>p</i> = 0.363) between colistin monotherapy and colistin plus meropenem. In conclusion, the addition of meropenem to colistin caused a reduction in 30-day mortality, higher clinical and microbiological responses, and did not increase nephrotoxicity compared to colistin monotherapy. Furthermore, 30-day mortality was significantly related with age, receiving vasopressor, having malignancy, and the APACHE II score.
topic critically ill patients
combination therapy
colistin
meropenem
carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/10/647
work_keys_str_mv AT wasankatip acomparisonofcolistinversuscolistinplusmeropenemforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantiacinetobacterbaumanniiiincriticallyillpatientsapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT suriyonuitrakul acomparisonofcolistinversuscolistinplusmeropenemforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantiacinetobacterbaumanniiiincriticallyillpatientsapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT peninnahoberdorfer acomparisonofcolistinversuscolistinplusmeropenemforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantiacinetobacterbaumanniiiincriticallyillpatientsapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT wasankatip comparisonofcolistinversuscolistinplusmeropenemforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantiacinetobacterbaumanniiiincriticallyillpatientsapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT suriyonuitrakul comparisonofcolistinversuscolistinplusmeropenemforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantiacinetobacterbaumanniiiincriticallyillpatientsapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT peninnahoberdorfer comparisonofcolistinversuscolistinplusmeropenemforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantiacinetobacterbaumanniiiincriticallyillpatientsapropensityscorematchedanalysis
_version_ 1724619627690983424