A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> (CRAB), an important nosocomial pathogen, occurs particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU). Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of documented treatment with colistin monotherapy versus colistin plus me...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Antibiotics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/10/647 |
id |
doaj-e64017d24c99497996bf00678e88ad40 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e64017d24c99497996bf00678e88ad402020-11-25T03:20:03ZengMDPI AGAntibiotics2079-63822020-09-01964764710.3390/antibiotics9100647A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched AnalysisWasan Katip0Suriyon Uitrakul1Peninnah Oberdorfer2Department of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, ThailandDepartment of Pharmaceutical Care, School of Pharmacy, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, ThailandEpidemiology Research Group of Infectious Disease (ERGID), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, ThailandCarbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> (CRAB), an important nosocomial pathogen, occurs particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU). Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of documented treatment with colistin monotherapy versus colistin plus meropenem in critically ill patients with CRAB infections at Chiang Mai University Hospital (CMUH). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients with CRAB infections in an ICU from 2015 to 2017, who received colistin monotherapy versus colistin plus meropenem. After propensity score matching, an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of a 30-day mortality rate in patients who received colistin plus meropenem was 0.43 compared to those who received colistin monotherapy (95% CI, 0.23–0.82, <i>p</i> = 0.01). aORs of clinical response and microbiological response were also higher in patients who received colistin plus meropenem (1.81, 95% CI 1.01–3.26, <i>p</i> = 0.048 and 2.08, 95% CI 1.11–3.91, <i>p</i> = 0.023, respectively). There was no significant difference in nephrotoxicity (aOR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.43–1.36, <i>p</i> = 0.363) between colistin monotherapy and colistin plus meropenem. In conclusion, the addition of meropenem to colistin caused a reduction in 30-day mortality, higher clinical and microbiological responses, and did not increase nephrotoxicity compared to colistin monotherapy. Furthermore, 30-day mortality was significantly related with age, receiving vasopressor, having malignancy, and the APACHE II score.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/10/647critically ill patientscombination therapycolistinmeropenemcarbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wasan Katip Suriyon Uitrakul Peninnah Oberdorfer |
spellingShingle |
Wasan Katip Suriyon Uitrakul Peninnah Oberdorfer A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Antibiotics critically ill patients combination therapy colistin meropenem carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> |
author_facet |
Wasan Katip Suriyon Uitrakul Peninnah Oberdorfer |
author_sort |
Wasan Katip |
title |
A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis |
title_short |
A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis |
title_full |
A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis |
title_fullStr |
A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison of Colistin versus Colistin Plus Meropenem for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> in Critically Ill Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis |
title_sort |
comparison of colistin versus colistin plus meropenem for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant <i>acinetobacter baumannii</i> in critically ill patients: a propensity score-matched analysis |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Antibiotics |
issn |
2079-6382 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
Carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> (CRAB), an important nosocomial pathogen, occurs particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU). Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of documented treatment with colistin monotherapy versus colistin plus meropenem in critically ill patients with CRAB infections at Chiang Mai University Hospital (CMUH). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients with CRAB infections in an ICU from 2015 to 2017, who received colistin monotherapy versus colistin plus meropenem. After propensity score matching, an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of a 30-day mortality rate in patients who received colistin plus meropenem was 0.43 compared to those who received colistin monotherapy (95% CI, 0.23–0.82, <i>p</i> = 0.01). aORs of clinical response and microbiological response were also higher in patients who received colistin plus meropenem (1.81, 95% CI 1.01–3.26, <i>p</i> = 0.048 and 2.08, 95% CI 1.11–3.91, <i>p</i> = 0.023, respectively). There was no significant difference in nephrotoxicity (aOR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.43–1.36, <i>p</i> = 0.363) between colistin monotherapy and colistin plus meropenem. In conclusion, the addition of meropenem to colistin caused a reduction in 30-day mortality, higher clinical and microbiological responses, and did not increase nephrotoxicity compared to colistin monotherapy. Furthermore, 30-day mortality was significantly related with age, receiving vasopressor, having malignancy, and the APACHE II score. |
topic |
critically ill patients combination therapy colistin meropenem carbapenem-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/10/647 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wasankatip acomparisonofcolistinversuscolistinplusmeropenemforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantiacinetobacterbaumanniiiincriticallyillpatientsapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT suriyonuitrakul acomparisonofcolistinversuscolistinplusmeropenemforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantiacinetobacterbaumanniiiincriticallyillpatientsapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT peninnahoberdorfer acomparisonofcolistinversuscolistinplusmeropenemforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantiacinetobacterbaumanniiiincriticallyillpatientsapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT wasankatip comparisonofcolistinversuscolistinplusmeropenemforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantiacinetobacterbaumanniiiincriticallyillpatientsapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT suriyonuitrakul comparisonofcolistinversuscolistinplusmeropenemforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantiacinetobacterbaumanniiiincriticallyillpatientsapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT peninnahoberdorfer comparisonofcolistinversuscolistinplusmeropenemforthetreatmentofcarbapenemresistantiacinetobacterbaumanniiiincriticallyillpatientsapropensityscorematchedanalysis |
_version_ |
1724619627690983424 |