Interinstitutional and interstate teleneuropathology

Background: Telemedicine has emerged as an efficient means of distributing professional medical expertise over a broad geographic area with few limitations to the various services that can be provided around the globe. Telepathology is particularly well suited to distributing subspecialty expertise...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clayton A Wiley, Geoff Murdoch, Anil Parwani, Terry Cudahy, David Wilson, Troy Payner, Kim Springer, Terrence Lewis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2011-01-01
Series:Journal of Pathology Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2011;volume=2;issue=1;spage=21;epage=21;aulast=Wiley
id doaj-e645a94b1fa945288a851e707d8b32cd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e645a94b1fa945288a851e707d8b32cd2020-11-25T00:40:26ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pathology Informatics2153-35392153-35392011-01-0121212110.4103/2153-3539.80717Interinstitutional and interstate teleneuropathologyClayton A WileyGeoff MurdochAnil ParwaniTerry CudahyDavid WilsonTroy PaynerKim SpringerTerrence LewisBackground: Telemedicine has emerged as an efficient means of distributing professional medical expertise over a broad geographic area with few limitations to the various services that can be provided around the globe. Telepathology is particularly well suited to distributing subspecialty expertise in certain environments in an economical fashion, while preserving centers of excellence. Materials and Methods: After a decade of intrainstitutional teleneuropathology for intraoperative consultation, we expanded our practice to cross state lines and communicate between geographically and financially separate medical centers. Results: The result was an effective means of distributing neuropathological expertise while at the same time preserving a professional center of excellence. While technical and legal (i.e., physician licensing) barriers were surmounted, expected and unexpected issues related to communication required commitment on the part of multiple individuals with diverse expertise and responsibilities. Conclusion: Lessons learned from this successful venture can be used to facilitate future efforts in this ever-growing practical vehicle for distributing pathology subspecialty expertise.http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2011;volume=2;issue=1;spage=21;epage=21;aulast=WileyNeuropathologypathology practiceprofessional licensingtelepathology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clayton A Wiley
Geoff Murdoch
Anil Parwani
Terry Cudahy
David Wilson
Troy Payner
Kim Springer
Terrence Lewis
spellingShingle Clayton A Wiley
Geoff Murdoch
Anil Parwani
Terry Cudahy
David Wilson
Troy Payner
Kim Springer
Terrence Lewis
Interinstitutional and interstate teleneuropathology
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Neuropathology
pathology practice
professional licensing
telepathology
author_facet Clayton A Wiley
Geoff Murdoch
Anil Parwani
Terry Cudahy
David Wilson
Troy Payner
Kim Springer
Terrence Lewis
author_sort Clayton A Wiley
title Interinstitutional and interstate teleneuropathology
title_short Interinstitutional and interstate teleneuropathology
title_full Interinstitutional and interstate teleneuropathology
title_fullStr Interinstitutional and interstate teleneuropathology
title_full_unstemmed Interinstitutional and interstate teleneuropathology
title_sort interinstitutional and interstate teleneuropathology
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Pathology Informatics
issn 2153-3539
2153-3539
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Background: Telemedicine has emerged as an efficient means of distributing professional medical expertise over a broad geographic area with few limitations to the various services that can be provided around the globe. Telepathology is particularly well suited to distributing subspecialty expertise in certain environments in an economical fashion, while preserving centers of excellence. Materials and Methods: After a decade of intrainstitutional teleneuropathology for intraoperative consultation, we expanded our practice to cross state lines and communicate between geographically and financially separate medical centers. Results: The result was an effective means of distributing neuropathological expertise while at the same time preserving a professional center of excellence. While technical and legal (i.e., physician licensing) barriers were surmounted, expected and unexpected issues related to communication required commitment on the part of multiple individuals with diverse expertise and responsibilities. Conclusion: Lessons learned from this successful venture can be used to facilitate future efforts in this ever-growing practical vehicle for distributing pathology subspecialty expertise.
topic Neuropathology
pathology practice
professional licensing
telepathology
url http://www.jpathinformatics.org/article.asp?issn=2153-3539;year=2011;volume=2;issue=1;spage=21;epage=21;aulast=Wiley
work_keys_str_mv AT claytonawiley interinstitutionalandinterstateteleneuropathology
AT geoffmurdoch interinstitutionalandinterstateteleneuropathology
AT anilparwani interinstitutionalandinterstateteleneuropathology
AT terrycudahy interinstitutionalandinterstateteleneuropathology
AT davidwilson interinstitutionalandinterstateteleneuropathology
AT troypayner interinstitutionalandinterstateteleneuropathology
AT kimspringer interinstitutionalandinterstateteleneuropathology
AT terrencelewis interinstitutionalandinterstateteleneuropathology
_version_ 1725290111514443776