EVALUATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AS A METHOD FOR EXAMINING CARCASS COMPOSITION OF RAINBOW TROUT

Two year groups (1+ and 2+; n = 10/group) of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were sampled from a Danish marine fish farm. Fish were selected to span the same weight range (1+: 2643 - 3875 g; 2+: 2651 - 3912 g). During production (April to November) fish were fed identical commercial diets. Visua...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B Rønsholdt, H Nielsen, J Faergemand, Ewen McLean
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2000-03-01
Series:Croatian Journal of Fisheries
Subjects:
fat
Online Access:http://ribarstvo.agr.hr/articles/75497_EVALUATION_OF_IMAGE_ANALYSIS_AS_A_METHOD_FOR_EXAMINING_CARCASS_COMPOSITION_OF_RAINBOW_TROUT_en.pdf
id doaj-e6548d9db2484d298fd2da6a19a5f069
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e6548d9db2484d298fd2da6a19a5f0692020-11-25T00:21:45ZengSciendoCroatian Journal of Fisheries1330-061X1848-05862000-03-01581311EVALUATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AS A METHOD FOR EXAMINING CARCASS COMPOSITION OF RAINBOW TROUTB RønsholdtH NielsenJ FaergemandEwen McLeanTwo year groups (1+ and 2+; n = 10/group) of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were sampled from a Danish marine fish farm. Fish were selected to span the same weight range (1+: 2643 - 3875 g; 2+: 2651 - 3912 g). During production (April to November) fish were fed identical commercial diets. Visual fat depots of faster and slower growing animals were examined by image analysis of directly scanned cutlets. No significant (P > 0.05) correlation between meat percentage and fish size (length, weight, condition factor, dressed weight) was found, and t-tests failed to expose any difference in fat: meat ratio between 1+ and 2+ yr old rainbow trout. However, a significant difference (P < 0.05) between variances for the two groups was observed, being approximately four-fold larger for 1+ yr animals compared to 2+ yr. This finding indicates that selection for faster growth results in less uniform products from a compositional perspective. Where specific product specifications should be met, this might complicate production management.http://ribarstvo.agr.hr/articles/75497_EVALUATION_OF_IMAGE_ANALYSIS_AS_A_METHOD_FOR_EXAMINING_CARCASS_COMPOSITION_OF_RAINBOW_TROUT_en.pdffatpigmentationmeat ratioproduct qualitygrowth rate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author B Rønsholdt
H Nielsen
J Faergemand
Ewen McLean
spellingShingle B Rønsholdt
H Nielsen
J Faergemand
Ewen McLean
EVALUATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AS A METHOD FOR EXAMINING CARCASS COMPOSITION OF RAINBOW TROUT
Croatian Journal of Fisheries
fat
pigmentation
meat ratio
product quality
growth rate
author_facet B Rønsholdt
H Nielsen
J Faergemand
Ewen McLean
author_sort B Rønsholdt
title EVALUATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AS A METHOD FOR EXAMINING CARCASS COMPOSITION OF RAINBOW TROUT
title_short EVALUATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AS A METHOD FOR EXAMINING CARCASS COMPOSITION OF RAINBOW TROUT
title_full EVALUATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AS A METHOD FOR EXAMINING CARCASS COMPOSITION OF RAINBOW TROUT
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AS A METHOD FOR EXAMINING CARCASS COMPOSITION OF RAINBOW TROUT
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF IMAGE ANALYSIS AS A METHOD FOR EXAMINING CARCASS COMPOSITION OF RAINBOW TROUT
title_sort evaluation of image analysis as a method for examining carcass composition of rainbow trout
publisher Sciendo
series Croatian Journal of Fisheries
issn 1330-061X
1848-0586
publishDate 2000-03-01
description Two year groups (1+ and 2+; n = 10/group) of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were sampled from a Danish marine fish farm. Fish were selected to span the same weight range (1+: 2643 - 3875 g; 2+: 2651 - 3912 g). During production (April to November) fish were fed identical commercial diets. Visual fat depots of faster and slower growing animals were examined by image analysis of directly scanned cutlets. No significant (P > 0.05) correlation between meat percentage and fish size (length, weight, condition factor, dressed weight) was found, and t-tests failed to expose any difference in fat: meat ratio between 1+ and 2+ yr old rainbow trout. However, a significant difference (P < 0.05) between variances for the two groups was observed, being approximately four-fold larger for 1+ yr animals compared to 2+ yr. This finding indicates that selection for faster growth results in less uniform products from a compositional perspective. Where specific product specifications should be met, this might complicate production management.
topic fat
pigmentation
meat ratio
product quality
growth rate
url http://ribarstvo.agr.hr/articles/75497_EVALUATION_OF_IMAGE_ANALYSIS_AS_A_METHOD_FOR_EXAMINING_CARCASS_COMPOSITION_OF_RAINBOW_TROUT_en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT brønsholdt evaluationofimageanalysisasamethodforexaminingcarcasscompositionofrainbowtrout
AT hnielsen evaluationofimageanalysisasamethodforexaminingcarcasscompositionofrainbowtrout
AT jfaergemand evaluationofimageanalysisasamethodforexaminingcarcasscompositionofrainbowtrout
AT ewenmclean evaluationofimageanalysisasamethodforexaminingcarcasscompositionofrainbowtrout
_version_ 1725361084243640320