Performance of KMA-ADAM3 in Identifying Asian Dust Days over Northern China

Recently, the Korea Meteorological Administration developed Asian Dust Aerosol Model version 3 (ADAM3) by incorporating additional parameters into ADAM2, including anthropogenic particulate matter (PM) emissions, modification of dust generation by considering real-time surface vegetation, and assimi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sang-Boom Ryoo, Jinwon Kim, Jeong Hoon Cho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/11/6/593
id doaj-e676dbe0ccb34f5d8424d6ed4f90da3c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e676dbe0ccb34f5d8424d6ed4f90da3c2020-11-25T03:19:56ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332020-06-011159359310.3390/atmos11060593Performance of KMA-ADAM3 in Identifying Asian Dust Days over Northern ChinaSang-Boom Ryoo0Jinwon Kim1Jeong Hoon Cho2National Institute of Meteorological Sciences, 33, Seohobuk-ro, Seogwipo-si, Jeju-do 63568, KoreaNational Institute of Meteorological Sciences, 33, Seohobuk-ro, Seogwipo-si, Jeju-do 63568, KoreaNational Institute of Meteorological Sciences, 33, Seohobuk-ro, Seogwipo-si, Jeju-do 63568, KoreaRecently, the Korea Meteorological Administration developed Asian Dust Aerosol Model version 3 (ADAM3) by incorporating additional parameters into ADAM2, including anthropogenic particulate matter (PM) emissions, modification of dust generation by considering real-time surface vegetation, and assimilations of surface PM observations and satellite-measured aerosol optical depth. This study evaluates the performance of ADAM3 in identifying Asian dust days over the dust source regions in Northern China and their variations according to regions and soil types by comparing its performance with ADAM2 (from January to June of 2017). In all regions the performance of ADAM3 was markedly improved, especially for Northwestern China, where the threat score (TS) and the probability of detection (POD) improved from 5.4% and 5.5% to 30.4% and 34.4%, respectively. ADAM3 outperforms ADAM2 for all soil types, especially for the sand-type soil for which TS and POD are improved from 39.2.0% and 50.7% to 48.9% and 68.2%, respectively. Despite these improvements in regions and surface soil types, Asian dust emission formulas in ADAM3 need improvement for the loess-type soils to modulate the overestimation of Asian dust events related to anthropogenic emissions in the Huabei Plain and Manchuria.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/11/6/593Asian Dust Aerosol Model 3 (ADAM3)Asian dust daysNorthern Chinasoil types
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sang-Boom Ryoo
Jinwon Kim
Jeong Hoon Cho
spellingShingle Sang-Boom Ryoo
Jinwon Kim
Jeong Hoon Cho
Performance of KMA-ADAM3 in Identifying Asian Dust Days over Northern China
Atmosphere
Asian Dust Aerosol Model 3 (ADAM3)
Asian dust days
Northern China
soil types
author_facet Sang-Boom Ryoo
Jinwon Kim
Jeong Hoon Cho
author_sort Sang-Boom Ryoo
title Performance of KMA-ADAM3 in Identifying Asian Dust Days over Northern China
title_short Performance of KMA-ADAM3 in Identifying Asian Dust Days over Northern China
title_full Performance of KMA-ADAM3 in Identifying Asian Dust Days over Northern China
title_fullStr Performance of KMA-ADAM3 in Identifying Asian Dust Days over Northern China
title_full_unstemmed Performance of KMA-ADAM3 in Identifying Asian Dust Days over Northern China
title_sort performance of kma-adam3 in identifying asian dust days over northern china
publisher MDPI AG
series Atmosphere
issn 2073-4433
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Recently, the Korea Meteorological Administration developed Asian Dust Aerosol Model version 3 (ADAM3) by incorporating additional parameters into ADAM2, including anthropogenic particulate matter (PM) emissions, modification of dust generation by considering real-time surface vegetation, and assimilations of surface PM observations and satellite-measured aerosol optical depth. This study evaluates the performance of ADAM3 in identifying Asian dust days over the dust source regions in Northern China and their variations according to regions and soil types by comparing its performance with ADAM2 (from January to June of 2017). In all regions the performance of ADAM3 was markedly improved, especially for Northwestern China, where the threat score (TS) and the probability of detection (POD) improved from 5.4% and 5.5% to 30.4% and 34.4%, respectively. ADAM3 outperforms ADAM2 for all soil types, especially for the sand-type soil for which TS and POD are improved from 39.2.0% and 50.7% to 48.9% and 68.2%, respectively. Despite these improvements in regions and surface soil types, Asian dust emission formulas in ADAM3 need improvement for the loess-type soils to modulate the overestimation of Asian dust events related to anthropogenic emissions in the Huabei Plain and Manchuria.
topic Asian Dust Aerosol Model 3 (ADAM3)
Asian dust days
Northern China
soil types
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/11/6/593
work_keys_str_mv AT sangboomryoo performanceofkmaadam3inidentifyingasiandustdaysovernorthernchina
AT jinwonkim performanceofkmaadam3inidentifyingasiandustdaysovernorthernchina
AT jeonghooncho performanceofkmaadam3inidentifyingasiandustdaysovernorthernchina
_version_ 1724620191934971904