Views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview study

Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an in-situ (pre-cancerous) breast malignancy whereby malignant cells are contained within the basement membrane of the breast ducts. Increasing awareness that some low-risk forms of DCIS might remain indolent for many years has led to concern about over...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brooke Nickel, Kirsten McCaffery, Nehmat Houssami, Jesse Jansen, Christobel Saunders, Andrew Spillane, Claudia Rutherford, Ann Dixon, Alexandra Barratt, Kirsty Stuart, Geraldine Robertson, Jolyn Hersch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-12-01
Series:Breast
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096097762030179X
id doaj-e6a57fb58ca242c5a6cdb2cd905362a2
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brooke Nickel
Kirsten McCaffery
Nehmat Houssami
Jesse Jansen
Christobel Saunders
Andrew Spillane
Claudia Rutherford
Ann Dixon
Alexandra Barratt
Kirsty Stuart
Geraldine Robertson
Jolyn Hersch
spellingShingle Brooke Nickel
Kirsten McCaffery
Nehmat Houssami
Jesse Jansen
Christobel Saunders
Andrew Spillane
Claudia Rutherford
Ann Dixon
Alexandra Barratt
Kirsty Stuart
Geraldine Robertson
Jolyn Hersch
Views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview study
Breast
Ductal carcinoma in situ
Management
Active monitoring
Overtreatment
Qualitative
author_facet Brooke Nickel
Kirsten McCaffery
Nehmat Houssami
Jesse Jansen
Christobel Saunders
Andrew Spillane
Claudia Rutherford
Ann Dixon
Alexandra Barratt
Kirsty Stuart
Geraldine Robertson
Jolyn Hersch
author_sort Brooke Nickel
title Views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview study
title_short Views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview study
title_full Views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview study
title_sort views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (dcis): qualitative interview study
publisher Elsevier
series Breast
issn 1532-3080
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an in-situ (pre-cancerous) breast malignancy whereby malignant cells are contained within the basement membrane of the breast ducts. Increasing awareness that some low-risk forms of DCIS might remain indolent for many years has led to concern about overtreatment, with at least 3 clinical trials underway internationally assessing the safety of active monitoring for low-risk DCIS. This study aimed to understand healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) views on the management options for patients with DCIS. Methods: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with HCPs involved in the diagnosis and management of DCIS in Australia and New Zealand. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically using Framework Analysis method. Results: Twenty-six HCPs including 10 breast surgeons, 3 breast physicians, 6 radiation oncologists, and 7 breast care nurses participated. There was a strong overall consensus that DCIS requires active treatment. HCPs generally felt uncomfortable recommending active monitoring as a management option for low-risk DCIS as they viewed this as outside current standard care. Overall, HCPs felt that active monitoring was an unproven strategy in need of an evidence base; however, many acknowledged that active monitoring for low-risk DCIS could be appropriate for patients with significant co-morbidities or limited life expectancy. They believed that most patients would opt for surgery wherever possible. Conclusions: This study highlights the important need for robust randomised controlled trial data about active monitoring for women with low-risk DCIS, to provide HCPs with confidence in their management recommendations and decision-making.
topic Ductal carcinoma in situ
Management
Active monitoring
Overtreatment
Qualitative
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096097762030179X
work_keys_str_mv AT brookenickel viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsabouttheroleofactivemonitoringinthemanagementofductalcarcinomainsitudcisqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT kirstenmccaffery viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsabouttheroleofactivemonitoringinthemanagementofductalcarcinomainsitudcisqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT nehmathoussami viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsabouttheroleofactivemonitoringinthemanagementofductalcarcinomainsitudcisqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT jessejansen viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsabouttheroleofactivemonitoringinthemanagementofductalcarcinomainsitudcisqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT christobelsaunders viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsabouttheroleofactivemonitoringinthemanagementofductalcarcinomainsitudcisqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT andrewspillane viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsabouttheroleofactivemonitoringinthemanagementofductalcarcinomainsitudcisqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT claudiarutherford viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsabouttheroleofactivemonitoringinthemanagementofductalcarcinomainsitudcisqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT anndixon viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsabouttheroleofactivemonitoringinthemanagementofductalcarcinomainsitudcisqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT alexandrabarratt viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsabouttheroleofactivemonitoringinthemanagementofductalcarcinomainsitudcisqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT kirstystuart viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsabouttheroleofactivemonitoringinthemanagementofductalcarcinomainsitudcisqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT geraldinerobertson viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsabouttheroleofactivemonitoringinthemanagementofductalcarcinomainsitudcisqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT jolynhersch viewsofhealthcareprofessionalsabouttheroleofactivemonitoringinthemanagementofductalcarcinomainsitudcisqualitativeinterviewstudy
_version_ 1724373721044484096
spelling doaj-e6a57fb58ca242c5a6cdb2cd905362a22020-12-23T04:58:34ZengElsevierBreast1532-30802020-12-015499105Views of healthcare professionals about the role of active monitoring in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Qualitative interview studyBrooke Nickel0Kirsten McCaffery1Nehmat Houssami2Jesse Jansen3Christobel Saunders4Andrew Spillane5Claudia Rutherford6Ann Dixon7Alexandra Barratt8Kirsty Stuart9Geraldine Robertson10Jolyn Hersch11Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, AustraliaWiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, AustraliaWiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, AustraliaWiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the NetherlandsSchool of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, AustraliaThe University of Sydney, Northern Clinical School, St Leonards, NSW, Australia; Mater Hospital, Wollstonecraft, NSW, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, AustraliaThe University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney, Faculty Medicine and Health, Sydney Nursing School, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaWiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, AustraliaWiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, AustraliaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead, NSW, Australia; Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia; Western Clinical School, The University of Sydney, NSW, AustraliaBreast Cancer Network Australia, VIC, AustraliaWiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Corresponding author. School of Public Health, Level 1, A27 Edward Ford Building, University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an in-situ (pre-cancerous) breast malignancy whereby malignant cells are contained within the basement membrane of the breast ducts. Increasing awareness that some low-risk forms of DCIS might remain indolent for many years has led to concern about overtreatment, with at least 3 clinical trials underway internationally assessing the safety of active monitoring for low-risk DCIS. This study aimed to understand healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) views on the management options for patients with DCIS. Methods: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with HCPs involved in the diagnosis and management of DCIS in Australia and New Zealand. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically using Framework Analysis method. Results: Twenty-six HCPs including 10 breast surgeons, 3 breast physicians, 6 radiation oncologists, and 7 breast care nurses participated. There was a strong overall consensus that DCIS requires active treatment. HCPs generally felt uncomfortable recommending active monitoring as a management option for low-risk DCIS as they viewed this as outside current standard care. Overall, HCPs felt that active monitoring was an unproven strategy in need of an evidence base; however, many acknowledged that active monitoring for low-risk DCIS could be appropriate for patients with significant co-morbidities or limited life expectancy. They believed that most patients would opt for surgery wherever possible. Conclusions: This study highlights the important need for robust randomised controlled trial data about active monitoring for women with low-risk DCIS, to provide HCPs with confidence in their management recommendations and decision-making.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096097762030179XDuctal carcinoma in situManagementActive monitoringOvertreatmentQualitative