Turning Doctors Into Employees

Background: Much of the contentious debate surrounding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) concerned its financing and its attempt to guarantee (near) universal access to healthcare through the private insurance market.  Aside from sensationalist stories of “death panels,” m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matthew Anderson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2014-05-01
Series:Radical Teacher
Online Access:http://radicalteacher.library.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/radicalteacher/article/view/104
id doaj-e6a676b6acc0493da498bb2172d0a24a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e6a676b6acc0493da498bb2172d0a24a2020-11-25T01:04:48ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghRadical Teacher1941-08322014-05-01990192610.5195/rt.2014.10464Turning Doctors Into EmployeesMatthew Anderson0Department of Family and Social Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of MedicineBackground: Much of the contentious debate surrounding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) concerned its financing and its attempt to guarantee (near) universal access to healthcare through the private insurance market.  Aside from sensationalist stories of “death panels,” much less attention went to implications of the bill for the actual provision of healthcare. Methodology: This paper examines the "patient-centered medical home" (PCMH) model which has been widely promoted as a means of reviving and improving primary care (i.e. general internal medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics). Argument: The PCMH and many of its components (e.g pay-for-performance, electronic medical records) were interventions that were implemented on a massive basis without any evidence of benefit. Recent research has not generally supported clinical benefits with the PCMH model. Instead it seems to designed to de-professionalize (make proletarians of) health care workers and enforce corporate models of health. The core values of professional work are undermined while the PCMH does nothing to address the structural marginalization of primary care within US health care. Conclusions: The development of alternative models will require political changes. Both doctors and teachers are in a position of advocate for more progressive systems of care and education.http://radicalteacher.library.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/radicalteacher/article/view/104
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew Anderson
spellingShingle Matthew Anderson
Turning Doctors Into Employees
Radical Teacher
author_facet Matthew Anderson
author_sort Matthew Anderson
title Turning Doctors Into Employees
title_short Turning Doctors Into Employees
title_full Turning Doctors Into Employees
title_fullStr Turning Doctors Into Employees
title_full_unstemmed Turning Doctors Into Employees
title_sort turning doctors into employees
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Radical Teacher
issn 1941-0832
publishDate 2014-05-01
description Background: Much of the contentious debate surrounding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) concerned its financing and its attempt to guarantee (near) universal access to healthcare through the private insurance market.  Aside from sensationalist stories of “death panels,” much less attention went to implications of the bill for the actual provision of healthcare. Methodology: This paper examines the "patient-centered medical home" (PCMH) model which has been widely promoted as a means of reviving and improving primary care (i.e. general internal medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics). Argument: The PCMH and many of its components (e.g pay-for-performance, electronic medical records) were interventions that were implemented on a massive basis without any evidence of benefit. Recent research has not generally supported clinical benefits with the PCMH model. Instead it seems to designed to de-professionalize (make proletarians of) health care workers and enforce corporate models of health. The core values of professional work are undermined while the PCMH does nothing to address the structural marginalization of primary care within US health care. Conclusions: The development of alternative models will require political changes. Both doctors and teachers are in a position of advocate for more progressive systems of care and education.
url http://radicalteacher.library.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/radicalteacher/article/view/104
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewanderson turningdoctorsintoemployees
_version_ 1725196097735884800