Performance investigation of two stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) architectures using induction turbine layouts in dual source waste heat recovery

Improvement in performance of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems, particularly in the context of dual heat sources such as IC engines, leads to better return on investments. However, the choice of architecture to achieve the best performance is not evident from available literature. When two separa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anandu Surendran, Satyanarayanan Seshadri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-04-01
Series:Energy Conversion and Management: X
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174520300015
id doaj-e6cbd35c11814911a3eeabd1d5d77457
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e6cbd35c11814911a3eeabd1d5d774572020-11-25T02:58:54ZengElsevierEnergy Conversion and Management: X2590-17452020-04-016Performance investigation of two stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) architectures using induction turbine layouts in dual source waste heat recoveryAnandu Surendran0Satyanarayanan Seshadri1Energy and Emissions Lab, Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Chennai 600036, IndiaCorresponding author.; Energy and Emissions Lab, Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Chennai 600036, IndiaImprovement in performance of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems, particularly in the context of dual heat sources such as IC engines, leads to better return on investments. However, the choice of architecture to achieve the best performance is not evident from available literature. When two separate heat sources are present concurrently at different temperature levels with heat contents such as in IC engines, single stage pre-heated ORC and dual loop ORC are the two commonly deployed ORC architectures. In this study, two stage architectures: Series two stage ORC (STORC) and Parallel two stage ORC (PTORC) are analysed and their performance is compared against a single stage pre-heated ORC at sub-critical conditions in the utilization of high temperature (primary) exhaust gases (573–773 K) and low temperature (secondary) jacket water (353–393 K) representing IC engine waste heat conditions. Results show that STORC and PTORC are able to achieve the maximum net power output for an intermediate utilization of secondary heat source. The power output gains from two stage layouts improves significantly with a reduction in heat source temperature difference and for lower ratios of the heat available between the primary to secondary heat source. For a 2.9 MW natural gas IC engine operating at its design point, STORC delivers 8.5% more power output whereas PTORC delivers 0.3% less power output than pre-heated ORC. Compared to a dual–loop ORC, STORC presents a less complex and improved cycle architecture with a 13.1% increased power output and a 27.9% reduced heat exchanger requirements.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174520300015Organic Rankine CycleDual pressure configurationTwo stage evaporationWaste heat recoveryDual heat sources
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anandu Surendran
Satyanarayanan Seshadri
spellingShingle Anandu Surendran
Satyanarayanan Seshadri
Performance investigation of two stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) architectures using induction turbine layouts in dual source waste heat recovery
Energy Conversion and Management: X
Organic Rankine Cycle
Dual pressure configuration
Two stage evaporation
Waste heat recovery
Dual heat sources
author_facet Anandu Surendran
Satyanarayanan Seshadri
author_sort Anandu Surendran
title Performance investigation of two stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) architectures using induction turbine layouts in dual source waste heat recovery
title_short Performance investigation of two stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) architectures using induction turbine layouts in dual source waste heat recovery
title_full Performance investigation of two stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) architectures using induction turbine layouts in dual source waste heat recovery
title_fullStr Performance investigation of two stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) architectures using induction turbine layouts in dual source waste heat recovery
title_full_unstemmed Performance investigation of two stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) architectures using induction turbine layouts in dual source waste heat recovery
title_sort performance investigation of two stage organic rankine cycle (orc) architectures using induction turbine layouts in dual source waste heat recovery
publisher Elsevier
series Energy Conversion and Management: X
issn 2590-1745
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Improvement in performance of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems, particularly in the context of dual heat sources such as IC engines, leads to better return on investments. However, the choice of architecture to achieve the best performance is not evident from available literature. When two separate heat sources are present concurrently at different temperature levels with heat contents such as in IC engines, single stage pre-heated ORC and dual loop ORC are the two commonly deployed ORC architectures. In this study, two stage architectures: Series two stage ORC (STORC) and Parallel two stage ORC (PTORC) are analysed and their performance is compared against a single stage pre-heated ORC at sub-critical conditions in the utilization of high temperature (primary) exhaust gases (573–773 K) and low temperature (secondary) jacket water (353–393 K) representing IC engine waste heat conditions. Results show that STORC and PTORC are able to achieve the maximum net power output for an intermediate utilization of secondary heat source. The power output gains from two stage layouts improves significantly with a reduction in heat source temperature difference and for lower ratios of the heat available between the primary to secondary heat source. For a 2.9 MW natural gas IC engine operating at its design point, STORC delivers 8.5% more power output whereas PTORC delivers 0.3% less power output than pre-heated ORC. Compared to a dual–loop ORC, STORC presents a less complex and improved cycle architecture with a 13.1% increased power output and a 27.9% reduced heat exchanger requirements.
topic Organic Rankine Cycle
Dual pressure configuration
Two stage evaporation
Waste heat recovery
Dual heat sources
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174520300015
work_keys_str_mv AT anandusurendran performanceinvestigationoftwostageorganicrankinecycleorcarchitecturesusinginductionturbinelayoutsindualsourcewasteheatrecovery
AT satyanarayananseshadri performanceinvestigationoftwostageorganicrankinecycleorcarchitecturesusinginductionturbinelayoutsindualsourcewasteheatrecovery
_version_ 1724704584512831488