One consensual depression diagnosis tool to serve many countries: a challenge! A RAND/UCLA methodology
Abstract Objective From a systematic literature review (SLR), it became clear that a consensually validated tool was needed by European General Practitioner (GP) researchers in order to allow multi-centred collaborative research, in daily practice, throughout Europe. Which diagnostic tool for depres...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Research Notes |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-017-3111-x |
id |
doaj-e6dd3f15457c41698b6cdcc2b972222c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e6dd3f15457c41698b6cdcc2b972222c2020-11-25T01:56:35ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002018-01-011111810.1186/s13104-017-3111-xOne consensual depression diagnosis tool to serve many countries: a challenge! A RAND/UCLA methodologyP. Nabbe0J. Y. Le Reste1M. Guillou-Landreat2E. Beck-Robert3R. Assenova4D. Lazic5S. Czachowski6S. Stojanović-Špehar7M. Hasanagic8H. Lingner9A. Clavería10M. I. Fernandez San Martin11A. Sowinska12S. Argyriadou13C. Lygidakis14B. Le Floch15C. Doerr16T. Montier17H. Van Marwijk18P. Van Royen19EA 7479 SPURBO, Department of General Practice, Université de Bretagne OccidentaleEA 7479 SPURBO, Department of General Practice, Université de Bretagne OccidentaleEA 7479 SPURBO, Department of Addictology, Université de Bretagne OccidentaleEA 7479 SPURBO, Department of General Practice, Université de Bretagne OccidentaleDepartment of General Practice, Medical University of Plovdiv, Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Family Medicine “Andrija Stampar”, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of ZagrebDepartment of Family Doctor, University Nicolaus CopernicusDepartment of Family Medicine “Andrija Štampar” School of Public Health, University of ZagrebDepartment of General Practice, University of SarajevoAllgemein Medizin Hochschule HannoverGalician Health Services, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia SurIDIAP Jordi GOL Unitat de Support a la RecercaDepartment of English, Nicolaus Copernicus UniversityThe Greek Association of General Practitioners (ELEGEIA)Institute for Health and Behaviour, Research Unit INSIDE, University of LuxembourgEA 7479 SPURBO, Department of General Practice, Université de Bretagne OccidentaleAllgemein Medizin Hochschule GöttingenUnite INSERM 1078, SFR 148 ScInBioS, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Université Européenne de BretagneDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of ManchesterDepartment of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit AntwerpenAbstract Objective From a systematic literature review (SLR), it became clear that a consensually validated tool was needed by European General Practitioner (GP) researchers in order to allow multi-centred collaborative research, in daily practice, throughout Europe. Which diagnostic tool for depression, validated against psychiatric examination according to the DSM, would GPs select as the best for use in clinical research, taking into account the combination of effectiveness, reliability and ergonomics? A RAND/UCLA, which combines the qualities of the Delphi process and of the nominal group, was used. GP researchers from different European countries were selected. The SLR extracted tools were validated against the DSM. The Youden index was used as an effectiveness criterion and Cronbach’s alpha as a reliability criterion. Ergonomics data were extracted from the literature. Ergonomics were tested face-to-face. Results The SLR extracted 7 tools. Two instruments were considered sufficiently effective and reliable for use: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist-25 (HSCL-25). After testing face-to-face, HSCL-25 was selected. A multicultural consensus on one diagnostic tool for depression was obtained for the HSCL-25. This tool will provide the opportunity to select homogeneous populations for European collaborative research in daily practice.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-017-3111-xRAND/UCLA appropriateness methodMulticultural consensusDelphi procedureDepression diagnosis tool |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
P. Nabbe J. Y. Le Reste M. Guillou-Landreat E. Beck-Robert R. Assenova D. Lazic S. Czachowski S. Stojanović-Špehar M. Hasanagic H. Lingner A. Clavería M. I. Fernandez San Martin A. Sowinska S. Argyriadou C. Lygidakis B. Le Floch C. Doerr T. Montier H. Van Marwijk P. Van Royen |
spellingShingle |
P. Nabbe J. Y. Le Reste M. Guillou-Landreat E. Beck-Robert R. Assenova D. Lazic S. Czachowski S. Stojanović-Špehar M. Hasanagic H. Lingner A. Clavería M. I. Fernandez San Martin A. Sowinska S. Argyriadou C. Lygidakis B. Le Floch C. Doerr T. Montier H. Van Marwijk P. Van Royen One consensual depression diagnosis tool to serve many countries: a challenge! A RAND/UCLA methodology BMC Research Notes RAND/UCLA appropriateness method Multicultural consensus Delphi procedure Depression diagnosis tool |
author_facet |
P. Nabbe J. Y. Le Reste M. Guillou-Landreat E. Beck-Robert R. Assenova D. Lazic S. Czachowski S. Stojanović-Špehar M. Hasanagic H. Lingner A. Clavería M. I. Fernandez San Martin A. Sowinska S. Argyriadou C. Lygidakis B. Le Floch C. Doerr T. Montier H. Van Marwijk P. Van Royen |
author_sort |
P. Nabbe |
title |
One consensual depression diagnosis tool to serve many countries: a challenge! A RAND/UCLA methodology |
title_short |
One consensual depression diagnosis tool to serve many countries: a challenge! A RAND/UCLA methodology |
title_full |
One consensual depression diagnosis tool to serve many countries: a challenge! A RAND/UCLA methodology |
title_fullStr |
One consensual depression diagnosis tool to serve many countries: a challenge! A RAND/UCLA methodology |
title_full_unstemmed |
One consensual depression diagnosis tool to serve many countries: a challenge! A RAND/UCLA methodology |
title_sort |
one consensual depression diagnosis tool to serve many countries: a challenge! a rand/ucla methodology |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Research Notes |
issn |
1756-0500 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Abstract Objective From a systematic literature review (SLR), it became clear that a consensually validated tool was needed by European General Practitioner (GP) researchers in order to allow multi-centred collaborative research, in daily practice, throughout Europe. Which diagnostic tool for depression, validated against psychiatric examination according to the DSM, would GPs select as the best for use in clinical research, taking into account the combination of effectiveness, reliability and ergonomics? A RAND/UCLA, which combines the qualities of the Delphi process and of the nominal group, was used. GP researchers from different European countries were selected. The SLR extracted tools were validated against the DSM. The Youden index was used as an effectiveness criterion and Cronbach’s alpha as a reliability criterion. Ergonomics data were extracted from the literature. Ergonomics were tested face-to-face. Results The SLR extracted 7 tools. Two instruments were considered sufficiently effective and reliable for use: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Hopkins Symptoms Checklist-25 (HSCL-25). After testing face-to-face, HSCL-25 was selected. A multicultural consensus on one diagnostic tool for depression was obtained for the HSCL-25. This tool will provide the opportunity to select homogeneous populations for European collaborative research in daily practice. |
topic |
RAND/UCLA appropriateness method Multicultural consensus Delphi procedure Depression diagnosis tool |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-017-3111-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pnabbe oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT jylereste oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT mguilloulandreat oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT ebeckrobert oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT rassenova oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT dlazic oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT sczachowski oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT sstojanovicspehar oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT mhasanagic oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT hlingner oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT aclaveria oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT mifernandezsanmartin oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT asowinska oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT sargyriadou oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT clygidakis oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT blefloch oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT cdoerr oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT tmontier oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT hvanmarwijk oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology AT pvanroyen oneconsensualdepressiondiagnosistooltoservemanycountriesachallengearanduclamethodology |
_version_ |
1724979086667808768 |