Iron Loss Analysis of a Concentrated Winding Type Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor with Single and Dual Layer Magnet Shape

In this study, the iron losses of high flux density concentrated winding-type interior permanent magnet synchronous motors for three different magnet shapes (single-V, single-flat, and dual-delta) and rotor structures are analyzed and compared. Iron loss is analyzed using the classical Steinmetz equ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chan-Ho Baek, Hyo-Seob Shin, Jang-Young Choi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Machines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/9/4/74
id doaj-e7152c47604a42979478b3a74f95e474
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e7152c47604a42979478b3a74f95e4742021-03-29T23:02:36ZengMDPI AGMachines2075-17022021-03-019747410.3390/machines9040074Iron Loss Analysis of a Concentrated Winding Type Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor with Single and Dual Layer Magnet ShapeChan-Ho Baek0Hyo-Seob Shin1Jang-Young Choi2Department of Electrical Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, KoreaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, KoreaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, KoreaIn this study, the iron losses of high flux density concentrated winding-type interior permanent magnet synchronous motors for three different magnet shapes (single-V, single-flat, and dual-delta) and rotor structures are analyzed and compared. Iron loss is analyzed using the classical Steinmetz equation (CSE) based on the frequency separation approach using the iron loss material table, and each rotor type is compared. In addition, to validate the hysteresis loss for each rotor type, two additional analyses are performed. In the methods considered, the number of minor loops is counted, and the area is calculated based on DC bias. The eddy current loss is compared using two approaches: CSE base frequency separation and the homogenization method considering the skin effect. This study primarily focuses on the comparison of relative iron losses based on different rotor topologies instead of absolute comparisons.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/9/4/74concentrated IPMSMiron losseseddy current losseshysteresis losses
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chan-Ho Baek
Hyo-Seob Shin
Jang-Young Choi
spellingShingle Chan-Ho Baek
Hyo-Seob Shin
Jang-Young Choi
Iron Loss Analysis of a Concentrated Winding Type Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor with Single and Dual Layer Magnet Shape
Machines
concentrated IPMSM
iron losses
eddy current losses
hysteresis losses
author_facet Chan-Ho Baek
Hyo-Seob Shin
Jang-Young Choi
author_sort Chan-Ho Baek
title Iron Loss Analysis of a Concentrated Winding Type Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor with Single and Dual Layer Magnet Shape
title_short Iron Loss Analysis of a Concentrated Winding Type Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor with Single and Dual Layer Magnet Shape
title_full Iron Loss Analysis of a Concentrated Winding Type Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor with Single and Dual Layer Magnet Shape
title_fullStr Iron Loss Analysis of a Concentrated Winding Type Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor with Single and Dual Layer Magnet Shape
title_full_unstemmed Iron Loss Analysis of a Concentrated Winding Type Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor with Single and Dual Layer Magnet Shape
title_sort iron loss analysis of a concentrated winding type interior permanent magnet synchronous motor with single and dual layer magnet shape
publisher MDPI AG
series Machines
issn 2075-1702
publishDate 2021-03-01
description In this study, the iron losses of high flux density concentrated winding-type interior permanent magnet synchronous motors for three different magnet shapes (single-V, single-flat, and dual-delta) and rotor structures are analyzed and compared. Iron loss is analyzed using the classical Steinmetz equation (CSE) based on the frequency separation approach using the iron loss material table, and each rotor type is compared. In addition, to validate the hysteresis loss for each rotor type, two additional analyses are performed. In the methods considered, the number of minor loops is counted, and the area is calculated based on DC bias. The eddy current loss is compared using two approaches: CSE base frequency separation and the homogenization method considering the skin effect. This study primarily focuses on the comparison of relative iron losses based on different rotor topologies instead of absolute comparisons.
topic concentrated IPMSM
iron losses
eddy current losses
hysteresis losses
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1702/9/4/74
work_keys_str_mv AT chanhobaek ironlossanalysisofaconcentratedwindingtypeinteriorpermanentmagnetsynchronousmotorwithsingleandduallayermagnetshape
AT hyoseobshin ironlossanalysisofaconcentratedwindingtypeinteriorpermanentmagnetsynchronousmotorwithsingleandduallayermagnetshape
AT jangyoungchoi ironlossanalysisofaconcentratedwindingtypeinteriorpermanentmagnetsynchronousmotorwithsingleandduallayermagnetshape
_version_ 1724190275017900032