Ananlysis of Carbon Emission Reduction and Power Dominance between Single Manufacturer and Single Retailer in Regulatory Cap and Trade System

In the cap and trade system, the paper analyses the Stackelberg game between the power asymmetrical retailer and manufacturer and designs a side-payment self-enforcing contract to resolve some arguments that the existing research overemphasizes spontaneity of participation in side-payment contracts...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liang-jie Xia, Hua-wei Zhi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/523451
id doaj-e738ba87352749f589d172e11f9adb30
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e738ba87352749f589d172e11f9adb302020-11-25T00:47:44ZengHindawi LimitedDiscrete Dynamics in Nature and Society1026-02261607-887X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/523451523451Ananlysis of Carbon Emission Reduction and Power Dominance between Single Manufacturer and Single Retailer in Regulatory Cap and Trade SystemLiang-jie Xia0Hua-wei Zhi1School of Business, Tianjin University of Finance and Economy, No. 25, Zhujiang Road, Tianjin 300222, ChinaSchool of Management, Tianjin Polytechnic University, No. 399, Binshuixi Road, Tianjin 300387, ChinaIn the cap and trade system, the paper analyses the Stackelberg game between the power asymmetrical retailer and manufacturer and designs a side-payment self-enforcing contract to resolve some arguments that the existing research overemphasizes spontaneity of participation in side-payment contracts design based on supply chain coordination and does not consider rationality and fairness of allocation of profit increment. Also, the numerical analysis was given. The research shows some important conclusions: in the supply chain, the dominant manufacturer is not able to encourage the retailer to improve its promotion level by increasing its carbon cutting level, but the optimal emission reduction level increases with the dominant retailer’s promotion level; the optimal promotion level, emission reduction, and product demand in a retailer leading supply chain are higher than those in a supply chain dominated by manufacturer; with the new side-payment self-enforcing contract, decentralized decision according to individual rationality incurs a collective reason effect in the centralized setting.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/523451
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Liang-jie Xia
Hua-wei Zhi
spellingShingle Liang-jie Xia
Hua-wei Zhi
Ananlysis of Carbon Emission Reduction and Power Dominance between Single Manufacturer and Single Retailer in Regulatory Cap and Trade System
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
author_facet Liang-jie Xia
Hua-wei Zhi
author_sort Liang-jie Xia
title Ananlysis of Carbon Emission Reduction and Power Dominance between Single Manufacturer and Single Retailer in Regulatory Cap and Trade System
title_short Ananlysis of Carbon Emission Reduction and Power Dominance between Single Manufacturer and Single Retailer in Regulatory Cap and Trade System
title_full Ananlysis of Carbon Emission Reduction and Power Dominance between Single Manufacturer and Single Retailer in Regulatory Cap and Trade System
title_fullStr Ananlysis of Carbon Emission Reduction and Power Dominance between Single Manufacturer and Single Retailer in Regulatory Cap and Trade System
title_full_unstemmed Ananlysis of Carbon Emission Reduction and Power Dominance between Single Manufacturer and Single Retailer in Regulatory Cap and Trade System
title_sort ananlysis of carbon emission reduction and power dominance between single manufacturer and single retailer in regulatory cap and trade system
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society
issn 1026-0226
1607-887X
publishDate 2014-01-01
description In the cap and trade system, the paper analyses the Stackelberg game between the power asymmetrical retailer and manufacturer and designs a side-payment self-enforcing contract to resolve some arguments that the existing research overemphasizes spontaneity of participation in side-payment contracts design based on supply chain coordination and does not consider rationality and fairness of allocation of profit increment. Also, the numerical analysis was given. The research shows some important conclusions: in the supply chain, the dominant manufacturer is not able to encourage the retailer to improve its promotion level by increasing its carbon cutting level, but the optimal emission reduction level increases with the dominant retailer’s promotion level; the optimal promotion level, emission reduction, and product demand in a retailer leading supply chain are higher than those in a supply chain dominated by manufacturer; with the new side-payment self-enforcing contract, decentralized decision according to individual rationality incurs a collective reason effect in the centralized setting.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/523451
work_keys_str_mv AT liangjiexia ananlysisofcarbonemissionreductionandpowerdominancebetweensinglemanufacturerandsingleretailerinregulatorycapandtradesystem
AT huaweizhi ananlysisofcarbonemissionreductionandpowerdominancebetweensinglemanufacturerandsingleretailerinregulatorycapandtradesystem
_version_ 1725258893752270848