Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
<b>Background</b>: Co-infection with malaria and chikungunya could exert a significant public health impact with infection misdiagnosis. Therefore, this study aimed to collect qualitative and quantitative evidence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients. <b>M...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2414-6366/6/3/119 |
id |
doaj-e74ae047d58f40d38e20319d7eca098f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e74ae047d58f40d38e20319d7eca098f2021-09-26T01:34:12ZengMDPI AGTropical Medicine and Infectious Disease2414-63662021-06-01611911910.3390/tropicalmed6030119Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisWanida Mala0Polrat Wilairatana1Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui2Manas Kotepui3Medical Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Tha Sala, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, ThailandDepartment of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 73170, ThailandMedical Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Tha Sala, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, ThailandMedical Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Tha Sala, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand<b>Background</b>: Co-infection with malaria and chikungunya could exert a significant public health impact with infection misdiagnosis. Therefore, this study aimed to collect qualitative and quantitative evidence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients. <b>Methods</b><b>:</b> Potentially relevant studies were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The bias risk of the included studies was assessed using the checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The pooled prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients and the pooled prevalence of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection among malaria patients were estimated with the random effect model. The odds of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients were also estimated using a random effect model that presumed the heterogeneity of the outcomes of the included studies. The heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics. Publication bias was assessed using the funnel plot and Egger’s test. <b>Results</b><b>:</b> Of the 1924 studies that were identified from the three databases, 10 fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in our study. The pooled prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection (182 cases) among febrile patients (16,787 cases), stratified by diagnostic tests for CHIKV infection, was 10% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8–11%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.5%) using RDT (IgM), 7% (95% CI: 4–10%) using the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT), 1% (95% CI: 0–2%, I<sup>2</sup>: 41.5%) using IgM and IgG ELISA, and 4% (95% CI: 2–6%) using real-time RT-PCR. When the prevalence was stratified by country, the prevalence of co-infection was 7% (95% CI: 5–10%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.5%) in Nigeria, 1% (95% CI: 0–2%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.5%) in Tanzania, 10% (95% CI: 8–11%) in Sierra Leone, 1% (95% CI: 0–4%) in Mozambique, and 4% (95% CI: 2–6%) in Kenya. The pooled prevalence of CHIKV infection (182 cases) among malaria patients (8317 cases), stratified by diagnostic tests for CHIKV infection, was 39% (95% CI: 34–44%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.7%) using RDT (IgM), 43% (95% CI: 30–57%) using PRNT, 5% (95% CI: 3–7%, I<sup>2</sup>: 5.18%) using IgM and IgG ELISA, and 9% (95% CI: 6–15%) using real-time RT-PCR. The meta-analysis showed that malaria and chikungunya co-infection occurred by chance (<i>p</i>: 0.59, OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.6–1.07, I<sup>2</sup>: 78.5%). <b>Conclusions</b><b>:</b> The prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection varied from 0% to 10% as per the diagnostic test for CHIKV infection or the country where the co-infection was reported. Hence, the clinicians who diagnose patients with malaria infections in areas where two diseases are endemic should further investigate for chikungunya co-infection to prevent misdiagnosis or delayed treatment of concurrent infection.https://www.mdpi.com/2414-6366/6/3/119malaria<i>Plasmodium</i>chikungunyaCHIKVco-infection |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wanida Mala Polrat Wilairatana Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui Manas Kotepui |
spellingShingle |
Wanida Mala Polrat Wilairatana Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui Manas Kotepui Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease malaria <i>Plasmodium</i> chikungunya CHIKV co-infection |
author_facet |
Wanida Mala Polrat Wilairatana Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui Manas Kotepui |
author_sort |
Wanida Mala |
title |
Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short |
Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full |
Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort |
prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection in febrile patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease |
issn |
2414-6366 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
<b>Background</b>: Co-infection with malaria and chikungunya could exert a significant public health impact with infection misdiagnosis. Therefore, this study aimed to collect qualitative and quantitative evidence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients. <b>Methods</b><b>:</b> Potentially relevant studies were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The bias risk of the included studies was assessed using the checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The pooled prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients and the pooled prevalence of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection among malaria patients were estimated with the random effect model. The odds of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients were also estimated using a random effect model that presumed the heterogeneity of the outcomes of the included studies. The heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics. Publication bias was assessed using the funnel plot and Egger’s test. <b>Results</b><b>:</b> Of the 1924 studies that were identified from the three databases, 10 fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in our study. The pooled prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection (182 cases) among febrile patients (16,787 cases), stratified by diagnostic tests for CHIKV infection, was 10% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8–11%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.5%) using RDT (IgM), 7% (95% CI: 4–10%) using the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT), 1% (95% CI: 0–2%, I<sup>2</sup>: 41.5%) using IgM and IgG ELISA, and 4% (95% CI: 2–6%) using real-time RT-PCR. When the prevalence was stratified by country, the prevalence of co-infection was 7% (95% CI: 5–10%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.5%) in Nigeria, 1% (95% CI: 0–2%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.5%) in Tanzania, 10% (95% CI: 8–11%) in Sierra Leone, 1% (95% CI: 0–4%) in Mozambique, and 4% (95% CI: 2–6%) in Kenya. The pooled prevalence of CHIKV infection (182 cases) among malaria patients (8317 cases), stratified by diagnostic tests for CHIKV infection, was 39% (95% CI: 34–44%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.7%) using RDT (IgM), 43% (95% CI: 30–57%) using PRNT, 5% (95% CI: 3–7%, I<sup>2</sup>: 5.18%) using IgM and IgG ELISA, and 9% (95% CI: 6–15%) using real-time RT-PCR. The meta-analysis showed that malaria and chikungunya co-infection occurred by chance (<i>p</i>: 0.59, OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.6–1.07, I<sup>2</sup>: 78.5%). <b>Conclusions</b><b>:</b> The prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection varied from 0% to 10% as per the diagnostic test for CHIKV infection or the country where the co-infection was reported. Hence, the clinicians who diagnose patients with malaria infections in areas where two diseases are endemic should further investigate for chikungunya co-infection to prevent misdiagnosis or delayed treatment of concurrent infection. |
topic |
malaria <i>Plasmodium</i> chikungunya CHIKV co-infection |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2414-6366/6/3/119 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wanidamala prevalenceofmalariaandchikungunyacoinfectioninfebrilepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT polratwilairatana prevalenceofmalariaandchikungunyacoinfectioninfebrilepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kwuntidauthaisarkotepui prevalenceofmalariaandchikungunyacoinfectioninfebrilepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT manaskotepui prevalenceofmalariaandchikungunyacoinfectioninfebrilepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1716868733246373888 |