Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

<b>Background</b>: Co-infection with malaria and chikungunya could exert a significant public health impact with infection misdiagnosis. Therefore, this study aimed to collect qualitative and quantitative evidence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients. <b>M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wanida Mala, Polrat Wilairatana, Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui, Manas Kotepui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2414-6366/6/3/119
id doaj-e74ae047d58f40d38e20319d7eca098f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e74ae047d58f40d38e20319d7eca098f2021-09-26T01:34:12ZengMDPI AGTropical Medicine and Infectious Disease2414-63662021-06-01611911910.3390/tropicalmed6030119Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisWanida Mala0Polrat Wilairatana1Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui2Manas Kotepui3Medical Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Tha Sala, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, ThailandDepartment of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 73170, ThailandMedical Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Tha Sala, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, ThailandMedical Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Tha Sala, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand<b>Background</b>: Co-infection with malaria and chikungunya could exert a significant public health impact with infection misdiagnosis. Therefore, this study aimed to collect qualitative and quantitative evidence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients. <b>Methods</b><b>:</b> Potentially relevant studies were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The bias risk of the included studies was assessed using the checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The pooled prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients and the pooled prevalence of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection among malaria patients were estimated with the random effect model. The odds of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients were also estimated using a random effect model that presumed the heterogeneity of the outcomes of the included studies. The heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics. Publication bias was assessed using the funnel plot and Egger’s test. <b>Results</b><b>:</b> Of the 1924 studies that were identified from the three databases, 10 fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in our study. The pooled prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection (182 cases) among febrile patients (16,787 cases), stratified by diagnostic tests for CHIKV infection, was 10% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8–11%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.5%) using RDT (IgM), 7% (95% CI: 4–10%) using the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT), 1% (95% CI: 0–2%, I<sup>2</sup>: 41.5%) using IgM and IgG ELISA, and 4% (95% CI: 2–6%) using real-time RT-PCR. When the prevalence was stratified by country, the prevalence of co-infection was 7% (95% CI: 5–10%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.5%) in Nigeria, 1% (95% CI: 0–2%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.5%) in Tanzania, 10% (95% CI: 8–11%) in Sierra Leone, 1% (95% CI: 0–4%) in Mozambique, and 4% (95% CI: 2–6%) in Kenya. The pooled prevalence of CHIKV infection (182 cases) among malaria patients (8317 cases), stratified by diagnostic tests for CHIKV infection, was 39% (95% CI: 34–44%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.7%) using RDT (IgM), 43% (95% CI: 30–57%) using PRNT, 5% (95% CI: 3–7%, I<sup>2</sup>: 5.18%) using IgM and IgG ELISA, and 9% (95% CI: 6–15%) using real-time RT-PCR. The meta-analysis showed that malaria and chikungunya co-infection occurred by chance (<i>p</i>: 0.59, OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.6–1.07, I<sup>2</sup>: 78.5%). <b>Conclusions</b><b>:</b> The prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection varied from 0% to 10% as per the diagnostic test for CHIKV infection or the country where the co-infection was reported. Hence, the clinicians who diagnose patients with malaria infections in areas where two diseases are endemic should further investigate for chikungunya co-infection to prevent misdiagnosis or delayed treatment of concurrent infection.https://www.mdpi.com/2414-6366/6/3/119malaria<i>Plasmodium</i>chikungunyaCHIKVco-infection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wanida Mala
Polrat Wilairatana
Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui
Manas Kotepui
spellingShingle Wanida Mala
Polrat Wilairatana
Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui
Manas Kotepui
Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
malaria
<i>Plasmodium</i>
chikungunya
CHIKV
co-infection
author_facet Wanida Mala
Polrat Wilairatana
Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui
Manas Kotepui
author_sort Wanida Mala
title Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Malaria and Chikungunya Co-Infection in Febrile Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection in febrile patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
issn 2414-6366
publishDate 2021-06-01
description <b>Background</b>: Co-infection with malaria and chikungunya could exert a significant public health impact with infection misdiagnosis. Therefore, this study aimed to collect qualitative and quantitative evidence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients. <b>Methods</b><b>:</b> Potentially relevant studies were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The bias risk of the included studies was assessed using the checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The pooled prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients and the pooled prevalence of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection among malaria patients were estimated with the random effect model. The odds of malaria and chikungunya co-infection among febrile patients were also estimated using a random effect model that presumed the heterogeneity of the outcomes of the included studies. The heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics. Publication bias was assessed using the funnel plot and Egger’s test. <b>Results</b><b>:</b> Of the 1924 studies that were identified from the three databases, 10 fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in our study. The pooled prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection (182 cases) among febrile patients (16,787 cases), stratified by diagnostic tests for CHIKV infection, was 10% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8–11%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.5%) using RDT (IgM), 7% (95% CI: 4–10%) using the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT), 1% (95% CI: 0–2%, I<sup>2</sup>: 41.5%) using IgM and IgG ELISA, and 4% (95% CI: 2–6%) using real-time RT-PCR. When the prevalence was stratified by country, the prevalence of co-infection was 7% (95% CI: 5–10%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.5%) in Nigeria, 1% (95% CI: 0–2%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.5%) in Tanzania, 10% (95% CI: 8–11%) in Sierra Leone, 1% (95% CI: 0–4%) in Mozambique, and 4% (95% CI: 2–6%) in Kenya. The pooled prevalence of CHIKV infection (182 cases) among malaria patients (8317 cases), stratified by diagnostic tests for CHIKV infection, was 39% (95% CI: 34–44%, I<sup>2</sup>: 99.7%) using RDT (IgM), 43% (95% CI: 30–57%) using PRNT, 5% (95% CI: 3–7%, I<sup>2</sup>: 5.18%) using IgM and IgG ELISA, and 9% (95% CI: 6–15%) using real-time RT-PCR. The meta-analysis showed that malaria and chikungunya co-infection occurred by chance (<i>p</i>: 0.59, OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.6–1.07, I<sup>2</sup>: 78.5%). <b>Conclusions</b><b>:</b> The prevalence of malaria and chikungunya co-infection varied from 0% to 10% as per the diagnostic test for CHIKV infection or the country where the co-infection was reported. Hence, the clinicians who diagnose patients with malaria infections in areas where two diseases are endemic should further investigate for chikungunya co-infection to prevent misdiagnosis or delayed treatment of concurrent infection.
topic malaria
<i>Plasmodium</i>
chikungunya
CHIKV
co-infection
url https://www.mdpi.com/2414-6366/6/3/119
work_keys_str_mv AT wanidamala prevalenceofmalariaandchikungunyacoinfectioninfebrilepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT polratwilairatana prevalenceofmalariaandchikungunyacoinfectioninfebrilepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kwuntidauthaisarkotepui prevalenceofmalariaandchikungunyacoinfectioninfebrilepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT manaskotepui prevalenceofmalariaandchikungunyacoinfectioninfebrilepatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1716868733246373888