Disparities in Health Care Quality Indicators among US Children with Special Health Care Needs According to Household Language Use

• Main Authors: Stella Yu, ScD, MPH, Sue Lin, MS, Bonnie Strickland, PhD, Sue Lin, MS, Bonnie Strickland, PhD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Global Health and Education Projects, Inc. 2015-10-01
• Series: International Journal of Maternal and Child Health and AIDS
• Subjects: children with special healthcare needs; household language use; limited English Proficiency; Socioeconomic status; race/ethnicity; healthcare quality
• Online Access: http://mchandaids.org/index.php/IJMA/article/view/51/47
• ISSN: 2161-8674; 2161-864X

Background: Lower health care utilization and less favorable health outcomes have been demonstrated in children from Non-English Primary Language households (NEPL) in previous studies. This study examines prevalence of health care quality indicators among US children with special health care needs (CSHCN) and their association with household language use. Methods: We used data from the 2009-2010 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, restricted to an analytic sample of 40,242 children. Logistic regression models were used to examine the effects of primary household language on the attainment of the 6 health care quality indicators for CSHCN. Results: Compared to CSHCN from English primary language households (EPL), CSHCN from NEPL households had 31% higher odds of not feeling like partners in health care decision-making. They had 67% higher odds of lacking care through a medical home and 42% higher odds of reporting inadequate health insurance. NEPL children had 32% higher odds of not receiving early and continuous screening for special health care needs. NEPL youths had 69% higher odds of not receiving services for transition to adulthood. Minority race/ethnicity, lower income and families other than two biological parents all conferred additional risks to not attaining quality indicators. Publicly insured or uninsured CSHCN were also at higher risk. Conclusions and Global Health Implications: Our study provides compelling evidence that significant disparities exist for CSHCN by primary household language status across all health care quality indicators. Establishment of effective surveillance systems and targeting of outreach programs in both developed and developing countries may lead to improved understanding of health care needs and quality of services and reduction of health disparities for this underserved population.