Examining the Testing Effect in University Teaching: Retrievability and Question Format Matter

Review of learned material is crucial for the learning process. One approach that promises to increase the effectiveness of reviewing during learning is to answer questions about the learning content rather than restudying the material (testing effect). This effect is well established in lab experim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sven Greving, Tobias Richter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02412/full
id doaj-e75e3096b6d94a6ab71a708be0f0e78e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e75e3096b6d94a6ab71a708be0f0e78e2020-11-25T00:53:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-12-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.02412411657Examining the Testing Effect in University Teaching: Retrievability and Question Format MatterSven GrevingTobias RichterReview of learned material is crucial for the learning process. One approach that promises to increase the effectiveness of reviewing during learning is to answer questions about the learning content rather than restudying the material (testing effect). This effect is well established in lab experiments. However, existing research in educational contexts has often combined testing with additional didactical measures that hampers the interpretation of testing effects. We aimed to examine the testing effect in its pure form by implementing a minimal intervention design in a university lecture (N = 92). The last 10 min of each lecture session were used for reviewing the lecture content by either answering short-answer questions, multiple-choice questions, or reading summarizing statements about core lecture content. Three unannounced criterial tests measured the retention of learning content at different times (1, 12, and 23 weeks after the last lecture). A positive testing effect emerged for short-answer questions that targeted information that participants could retrieve from memory. This effect was independent of the time of test. The results indicated no testing effect for multiple-choice testing. These results suggest that short-answer testing but not multiple-choice testing may benefit learning in higher education contexts.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02412/fulltesting effectuniversity teachingretrieval practicequestion formateducational psychologynet testing effect
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sven Greving
Tobias Richter
spellingShingle Sven Greving
Tobias Richter
Examining the Testing Effect in University Teaching: Retrievability and Question Format Matter
Frontiers in Psychology
testing effect
university teaching
retrieval practice
question format
educational psychology
net testing effect
author_facet Sven Greving
Tobias Richter
author_sort Sven Greving
title Examining the Testing Effect in University Teaching: Retrievability and Question Format Matter
title_short Examining the Testing Effect in University Teaching: Retrievability and Question Format Matter
title_full Examining the Testing Effect in University Teaching: Retrievability and Question Format Matter
title_fullStr Examining the Testing Effect in University Teaching: Retrievability and Question Format Matter
title_full_unstemmed Examining the Testing Effect in University Teaching: Retrievability and Question Format Matter
title_sort examining the testing effect in university teaching: retrievability and question format matter
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Review of learned material is crucial for the learning process. One approach that promises to increase the effectiveness of reviewing during learning is to answer questions about the learning content rather than restudying the material (testing effect). This effect is well established in lab experiments. However, existing research in educational contexts has often combined testing with additional didactical measures that hampers the interpretation of testing effects. We aimed to examine the testing effect in its pure form by implementing a minimal intervention design in a university lecture (N = 92). The last 10 min of each lecture session were used for reviewing the lecture content by either answering short-answer questions, multiple-choice questions, or reading summarizing statements about core lecture content. Three unannounced criterial tests measured the retention of learning content at different times (1, 12, and 23 weeks after the last lecture). A positive testing effect emerged for short-answer questions that targeted information that participants could retrieve from memory. This effect was independent of the time of test. The results indicated no testing effect for multiple-choice testing. These results suggest that short-answer testing but not multiple-choice testing may benefit learning in higher education contexts.
topic testing effect
university teaching
retrieval practice
question format
educational psychology
net testing effect
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02412/full
work_keys_str_mv AT svengreving examiningthetestingeffectinuniversityteachingretrievabilityandquestionformatmatter
AT tobiasrichter examiningthetestingeffectinuniversityteachingretrievabilityandquestionformatmatter
_version_ 1725236161106935808