Different managements of horseshoe kidney stones, any difference in the outcome?

Purpose: The aim is to assess the outcomes of different approaches for the management of renal stones associated with horseshoe kidneys (HSKs) in our institution over a 12-year period. Methods: A retrospective review of 144 patients with HSKs who presented from 2000 to 2012 was performed. Twenty-eig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdulhakim Al Otay, Osama Sarhan, Hossam S El-Tholoth, Ahmed Alhelaly, Hamad Al Akrash, Mustafa Al Ghanbar, Khaled Al Bedaiwi, Ziad Nakshabandi, Ali Obeid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Urology Annals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2018;volume=10;issue=3;spage=287;epage=290;aulast=Al
id doaj-e76fabb5d7cd4e3ea833ea6a4f618df1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e76fabb5d7cd4e3ea833ea6a4f618df12020-11-24T23:56:28ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsUrology Annals0974-77960974-78342018-01-0110328729010.4103/UA.UA_116_17Different managements of horseshoe kidney stones, any difference in the outcome?Abdulhakim Al OtayOsama SarhanHossam S El-TholothAhmed AlhelalyHamad Al AkrashMustafa Al GhanbarKhaled Al BedaiwiZiad NakshabandiAli ObeidPurpose: The aim is to assess the outcomes of different approaches for the management of renal stones associated with horseshoe kidneys (HSKs) in our institution over a 12-year period. Methods: A retrospective review of 144 patients with HSKs who presented from 2000 to 2012 was performed. Twenty-eight patients (19.4%) were found to have renal stones. Demographic data were collected; the method of treatment and the outcomes of stone management were reviewed. We excluded patients with non-functioning moieties and associated genitourinary anomalies, and those with incomplete data. Results: We included 25 patients, of which 16 males (64%) and 9 females (36%), with a mean age of 37 years. Mean serum creatinine level was 66 mmol/L. Eleven patients with a stone size <8 mm were treated expectantly with medical treatment, with only one patient requiring endoscopic intervention. Six patients (24%) with a stone size between 1 cm and ≤2 cm were treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with the placement of double J stents, and seven patients (28%) with a stone size of >2 cm were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. One patient with a 10 mm stone was treated using flexible ureteroscopy. No significant perioperative complications were encountered. Conclusions: Indications, methods of treatment, and outcomes of management of stones associated with HSKs were comparable to those for stones associated with normal kidneys. Tailored approach based on stone size is highly recommended. ESWL accompanied with ureteric stenting is a promising strategy for the management of stones associated with HSKs in selected patients requiring intervention.http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2018;volume=10;issue=3;spage=287;epage=290;aulast=AlHorseshoe kidneyoutcomepercutaneous nephrolithotomyshock wave lithotripsystones
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abdulhakim Al Otay
Osama Sarhan
Hossam S El-Tholoth
Ahmed Alhelaly
Hamad Al Akrash
Mustafa Al Ghanbar
Khaled Al Bedaiwi
Ziad Nakshabandi
Ali Obeid
spellingShingle Abdulhakim Al Otay
Osama Sarhan
Hossam S El-Tholoth
Ahmed Alhelaly
Hamad Al Akrash
Mustafa Al Ghanbar
Khaled Al Bedaiwi
Ziad Nakshabandi
Ali Obeid
Different managements of horseshoe kidney stones, any difference in the outcome?
Urology Annals
Horseshoe kidney
outcome
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
shock wave lithotripsy
stones
author_facet Abdulhakim Al Otay
Osama Sarhan
Hossam S El-Tholoth
Ahmed Alhelaly
Hamad Al Akrash
Mustafa Al Ghanbar
Khaled Al Bedaiwi
Ziad Nakshabandi
Ali Obeid
author_sort Abdulhakim Al Otay
title Different managements of horseshoe kidney stones, any difference in the outcome?
title_short Different managements of horseshoe kidney stones, any difference in the outcome?
title_full Different managements of horseshoe kidney stones, any difference in the outcome?
title_fullStr Different managements of horseshoe kidney stones, any difference in the outcome?
title_full_unstemmed Different managements of horseshoe kidney stones, any difference in the outcome?
title_sort different managements of horseshoe kidney stones, any difference in the outcome?
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Urology Annals
issn 0974-7796
0974-7834
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Purpose: The aim is to assess the outcomes of different approaches for the management of renal stones associated with horseshoe kidneys (HSKs) in our institution over a 12-year period. Methods: A retrospective review of 144 patients with HSKs who presented from 2000 to 2012 was performed. Twenty-eight patients (19.4%) were found to have renal stones. Demographic data were collected; the method of treatment and the outcomes of stone management were reviewed. We excluded patients with non-functioning moieties and associated genitourinary anomalies, and those with incomplete data. Results: We included 25 patients, of which 16 males (64%) and 9 females (36%), with a mean age of 37 years. Mean serum creatinine level was 66 mmol/L. Eleven patients with a stone size <8 mm were treated expectantly with medical treatment, with only one patient requiring endoscopic intervention. Six patients (24%) with a stone size between 1 cm and ≤2 cm were treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with the placement of double J stents, and seven patients (28%) with a stone size of >2 cm were treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. One patient with a 10 mm stone was treated using flexible ureteroscopy. No significant perioperative complications were encountered. Conclusions: Indications, methods of treatment, and outcomes of management of stones associated with HSKs were comparable to those for stones associated with normal kidneys. Tailored approach based on stone size is highly recommended. ESWL accompanied with ureteric stenting is a promising strategy for the management of stones associated with HSKs in selected patients requiring intervention.
topic Horseshoe kidney
outcome
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
shock wave lithotripsy
stones
url http://www.urologyannals.com/article.asp?issn=0974-7796;year=2018;volume=10;issue=3;spage=287;epage=290;aulast=Al
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulhakimalotay differentmanagementsofhorseshoekidneystonesanydifferenceintheoutcome
AT osamasarhan differentmanagementsofhorseshoekidneystonesanydifferenceintheoutcome
AT hossamseltholoth differentmanagementsofhorseshoekidneystonesanydifferenceintheoutcome
AT ahmedalhelaly differentmanagementsofhorseshoekidneystonesanydifferenceintheoutcome
AT hamadalakrash differentmanagementsofhorseshoekidneystonesanydifferenceintheoutcome
AT mustafaalghanbar differentmanagementsofhorseshoekidneystonesanydifferenceintheoutcome
AT khaledalbedaiwi differentmanagementsofhorseshoekidneystonesanydifferenceintheoutcome
AT ziadnakshabandi differentmanagementsofhorseshoekidneystonesanydifferenceintheoutcome
AT aliobeid differentmanagementsofhorseshoekidneystonesanydifferenceintheoutcome
_version_ 1725458391111827456