What is the evidence for the management of patients along the pathway from the emergency department to acute admission to reduce unplanned attendance and admission? An evidence synthesis
Abstract Background Globally, the rate of emergency hospital admissions is increasing. However, little evidence exists to inform the development of interventions to reduce unplanned Emergency Department (ED) attendances and hospital admissions. The objective of this evidence synthesis was to review...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-05-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-017-2299-8 |
id |
doaj-e7c91d30628d40a9afaf91f7e355507f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e7c91d30628d40a9afaf91f7e355507f2020-11-25T01:41:38ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632017-05-0117111810.1186/s12913-017-2299-8What is the evidence for the management of patients along the pathway from the emergency department to acute admission to reduce unplanned attendance and admission? An evidence synthesisSarah H. Credé0Colin O’Keeffe1Suzanne Mason2Anthea Sutton3Emma Howe4Susan J. Croft5Mike Whiteside6School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of SheffieldSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of SheffieldSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of SheffieldSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of SheffieldSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of SheffieldSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDoncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustAbstract Background Globally, the rate of emergency hospital admissions is increasing. However, little evidence exists to inform the development of interventions to reduce unplanned Emergency Department (ED) attendances and hospital admissions. The objective of this evidence synthesis was to review the evidence for interventions, conducted during the patient’s journey through the ED or acute care setting, to manage people with an exacerbation of a medical condition to reduce unplanned emergency hospital attendance and admissions. Methods A rapid evidence synthesis, using a systematic literature search, was undertaken in the electronic data bases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science, for the years 2000–2014. Evidence included in this review was restricted to Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) and observational studies (with a control arm) reported in peer-reviewed journals. Studies evaluating interventions for patients with an acute exacerbation of a medical condition in the ED or acute care setting which reported at least one outcome related to ED attendance or unplanned admission were included. Results Thirty papers met our inclusion criteria: 19 intervention studies (14 RCTs) and 11 controlled observational studies. Sixteen studies were set in the ED and 14 were conducted in an acute setting. Two studies (one RCT), set in the ED were effective in reducing ED attendance and hospital admission. Both of these interventions were initiated in the ED and included a post-discharge community component. Paradoxically 3 ED initiated interventions showed an increase in ED re-attendance. Six studies (1 RCT) set in acute care settings were effective in reducing: hospital admission, ED re-attendance or re-admission (two in an observation ward, one in an ED assessment unit and three in which the intervention was conducted within 72 h of admission). Conclusions There is no clear evidence that specific interventions along the patient journey from ED arrival to 72 h after admission benefit ED re-attendance or readmission. Interventions targeted at high-risk patients, particularly the elderly, may reduce ED utilization and warrant future research. Some interventions showing effectiveness in reducing unplanned ED attendances and admissions are delivered by appropriately trained personnel in an environment that allows sufficient time to assess and manage patients.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-017-2299-8Emergency medicineUnplanned attendanceAvoidable admissions |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sarah H. Credé Colin O’Keeffe Suzanne Mason Anthea Sutton Emma Howe Susan J. Croft Mike Whiteside |
spellingShingle |
Sarah H. Credé Colin O’Keeffe Suzanne Mason Anthea Sutton Emma Howe Susan J. Croft Mike Whiteside What is the evidence for the management of patients along the pathway from the emergency department to acute admission to reduce unplanned attendance and admission? An evidence synthesis BMC Health Services Research Emergency medicine Unplanned attendance Avoidable admissions |
author_facet |
Sarah H. Credé Colin O’Keeffe Suzanne Mason Anthea Sutton Emma Howe Susan J. Croft Mike Whiteside |
author_sort |
Sarah H. Credé |
title |
What is the evidence for the management of patients along the pathway from the emergency department to acute admission to reduce unplanned attendance and admission? An evidence synthesis |
title_short |
What is the evidence for the management of patients along the pathway from the emergency department to acute admission to reduce unplanned attendance and admission? An evidence synthesis |
title_full |
What is the evidence for the management of patients along the pathway from the emergency department to acute admission to reduce unplanned attendance and admission? An evidence synthesis |
title_fullStr |
What is the evidence for the management of patients along the pathway from the emergency department to acute admission to reduce unplanned attendance and admission? An evidence synthesis |
title_full_unstemmed |
What is the evidence for the management of patients along the pathway from the emergency department to acute admission to reduce unplanned attendance and admission? An evidence synthesis |
title_sort |
what is the evidence for the management of patients along the pathway from the emergency department to acute admission to reduce unplanned attendance and admission? an evidence synthesis |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Health Services Research |
issn |
1472-6963 |
publishDate |
2017-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Globally, the rate of emergency hospital admissions is increasing. However, little evidence exists to inform the development of interventions to reduce unplanned Emergency Department (ED) attendances and hospital admissions. The objective of this evidence synthesis was to review the evidence for interventions, conducted during the patient’s journey through the ED or acute care setting, to manage people with an exacerbation of a medical condition to reduce unplanned emergency hospital attendance and admissions. Methods A rapid evidence synthesis, using a systematic literature search, was undertaken in the electronic data bases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science, for the years 2000–2014. Evidence included in this review was restricted to Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) and observational studies (with a control arm) reported in peer-reviewed journals. Studies evaluating interventions for patients with an acute exacerbation of a medical condition in the ED or acute care setting which reported at least one outcome related to ED attendance or unplanned admission were included. Results Thirty papers met our inclusion criteria: 19 intervention studies (14 RCTs) and 11 controlled observational studies. Sixteen studies were set in the ED and 14 were conducted in an acute setting. Two studies (one RCT), set in the ED were effective in reducing ED attendance and hospital admission. Both of these interventions were initiated in the ED and included a post-discharge community component. Paradoxically 3 ED initiated interventions showed an increase in ED re-attendance. Six studies (1 RCT) set in acute care settings were effective in reducing: hospital admission, ED re-attendance or re-admission (two in an observation ward, one in an ED assessment unit and three in which the intervention was conducted within 72 h of admission). Conclusions There is no clear evidence that specific interventions along the patient journey from ED arrival to 72 h after admission benefit ED re-attendance or readmission. Interventions targeted at high-risk patients, particularly the elderly, may reduce ED utilization and warrant future research. Some interventions showing effectiveness in reducing unplanned ED attendances and admissions are delivered by appropriately trained personnel in an environment that allows sufficient time to assess and manage patients. |
topic |
Emergency medicine Unplanned attendance Avoidable admissions |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-017-2299-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sarahhcrede whatistheevidenceforthemanagementofpatientsalongthepathwayfromtheemergencydepartmenttoacuteadmissiontoreduceunplannedattendanceandadmissionanevidencesynthesis AT colinokeeffe whatistheevidenceforthemanagementofpatientsalongthepathwayfromtheemergencydepartmenttoacuteadmissiontoreduceunplannedattendanceandadmissionanevidencesynthesis AT suzannemason whatistheevidenceforthemanagementofpatientsalongthepathwayfromtheemergencydepartmenttoacuteadmissiontoreduceunplannedattendanceandadmissionanevidencesynthesis AT antheasutton whatistheevidenceforthemanagementofpatientsalongthepathwayfromtheemergencydepartmenttoacuteadmissiontoreduceunplannedattendanceandadmissionanevidencesynthesis AT emmahowe whatistheevidenceforthemanagementofpatientsalongthepathwayfromtheemergencydepartmenttoacuteadmissiontoreduceunplannedattendanceandadmissionanevidencesynthesis AT susanjcroft whatistheevidenceforthemanagementofpatientsalongthepathwayfromtheemergencydepartmenttoacuteadmissiontoreduceunplannedattendanceandadmissionanevidencesynthesis AT mikewhiteside whatistheevidenceforthemanagementofpatientsalongthepathwayfromtheemergencydepartmenttoacuteadmissiontoreduceunplannedattendanceandadmissionanevidencesynthesis |
_version_ |
1725040517867110400 |