Comparison of the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% + brinzolamide 1% versus dorzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% + latanoprost 0.005%: a 12-week, randomized open-label trial

Shunsuke Nakakura1, Hitoshi Tabuchi1, Yukio Baba2, Futoshi Maruiwa2, Nobuko Ando2, Takashi Kanamoto3, Yoshiaki Kiuchi31Department of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji, Hyogo Prefecture, Japan; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Baba Eye Clinic, Hiroshima, Japan, 3Department of Ophthalmol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanamoto T, Ando N, Maruiwa F, Baba Y, Nakakura S, Tabuchi H, Kiuchi Y
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2012-03-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-the-latanoprost-0005timolol-05--brinzolamide-1-versus-do-a9416
id doaj-e7d0fea4d4f24cc981076c6e4a5a1bc3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e7d0fea4d4f24cc981076c6e4a5a1bc32020-11-25T02:38:39ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54671177-54832012-03-012012default369375Comparison of the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% + brinzolamide 1% versus dorzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% + latanoprost 0.005%: a 12-week, randomized open-label trialKanamoto TAndo NMaruiwa FBaba YNakakura STabuchi HKiuchi YShunsuke Nakakura1, Hitoshi Tabuchi1, Yukio Baba2, Futoshi Maruiwa2, Nobuko Ando2, Takashi Kanamoto3, Yoshiaki Kiuchi31Department of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji, Hyogo Prefecture, Japan; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Baba Eye Clinic, Hiroshima, Japan, 3Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima City, JapanObjective: To compare the safety and effectiveness of fixed-combination regimes (latanoprost–timolol and brinzolamide 1% compared to dorzolamide 1%/timolol and latanoprost) in open-angle glaucoma patients after switching from a combination of three topical antiglaucoma eye drops.Methods: We conducted an open, randomized 12-week multicenter prospective study. We randomly allocated 39 patients who had been treated with three antiglaucoma eye drops (prostaglandin F2α analogues plus beta-blockers and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors) into two groups. Group A (n = 20) were treated with latanoprost–timolol and brinzolamide 1% therapy and Group B (n = 16) were treated with dorzolamide 1%/timolol and latanoprost. Thirty-six patients completed all 12 weeks of this study. The major clinical parameters measured were intraocular pressure (IOP), conjunctive hyperemia, superficial punctate keratopathy and hyperpigmentation of eyelid at baseline, 4, and 12 weeks. Additionally noted were adverse events and patient preferences, measured using a questionnaire at study initiation and at 12 weeks.Results: At baseline, IOPs were (Group A: 14.1 ± 2.9 mmHg, B: 14.5 ± 2.9 mmHg; P = 0.658), (Group A: 13.8 ± 2.6 mmHg, B: 14.3 ± 2.8 mmHg; P = 0.715) at 4 weeks, and (Group A: 14.1 ± 2.7 mmHg, B: 14.2 ± 2.7 mmHg; P = 0.538) at 12 weeks. Among the groups, there was no significant difference at any time point after baseline (P = 0.923, 0.951, respectively). All adverse events were not remarkably different after therapy. In regards to patient preference before and after switching therapy, 10 patients (50%) in Group A and 10 patients (63%) in Group B preferred using fixed-combination eye drop therapy.Conclusions: Effectiveness and safety were maintained in both groups after switching therapy. Overall, patients generally preferred using a fixed-combination therapy.Keywords: glaucoma, latanoprost–timolol, dorzolamide–timolol, brinzolamide, fixed combination, intraocular pressurehttp://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-the-latanoprost-0005timolol-05--brinzolamide-1-versus-do-a9416
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kanamoto T
Ando N
Maruiwa F
Baba Y
Nakakura S
Tabuchi H
Kiuchi Y
spellingShingle Kanamoto T
Ando N
Maruiwa F
Baba Y
Nakakura S
Tabuchi H
Kiuchi Y
Comparison of the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% + brinzolamide 1% versus dorzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% + latanoprost 0.005%: a 12-week, randomized open-label trial
Clinical Ophthalmology
author_facet Kanamoto T
Ando N
Maruiwa F
Baba Y
Nakakura S
Tabuchi H
Kiuchi Y
author_sort Kanamoto T
title Comparison of the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% + brinzolamide 1% versus dorzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% + latanoprost 0.005%: a 12-week, randomized open-label trial
title_short Comparison of the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% + brinzolamide 1% versus dorzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% + latanoprost 0.005%: a 12-week, randomized open-label trial
title_full Comparison of the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% + brinzolamide 1% versus dorzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% + latanoprost 0.005%: a 12-week, randomized open-label trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% + brinzolamide 1% versus dorzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% + latanoprost 0.005%: a 12-week, randomized open-label trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% + brinzolamide 1% versus dorzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% + latanoprost 0.005%: a 12-week, randomized open-label trial
title_sort comparison of the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% + brinzolamide 1% versus dorzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% + latanoprost 0.005%: a 12-week, randomized open-label trial
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Ophthalmology
issn 1177-5467
1177-5483
publishDate 2012-03-01
description Shunsuke Nakakura1, Hitoshi Tabuchi1, Yukio Baba2, Futoshi Maruiwa2, Nobuko Ando2, Takashi Kanamoto3, Yoshiaki Kiuchi31Department of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji, Hyogo Prefecture, Japan; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Baba Eye Clinic, Hiroshima, Japan, 3Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima City, JapanObjective: To compare the safety and effectiveness of fixed-combination regimes (latanoprost–timolol and brinzolamide 1% compared to dorzolamide 1%/timolol and latanoprost) in open-angle glaucoma patients after switching from a combination of three topical antiglaucoma eye drops.Methods: We conducted an open, randomized 12-week multicenter prospective study. We randomly allocated 39 patients who had been treated with three antiglaucoma eye drops (prostaglandin F2α analogues plus beta-blockers and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors) into two groups. Group A (n = 20) were treated with latanoprost–timolol and brinzolamide 1% therapy and Group B (n = 16) were treated with dorzolamide 1%/timolol and latanoprost. Thirty-six patients completed all 12 weeks of this study. The major clinical parameters measured were intraocular pressure (IOP), conjunctive hyperemia, superficial punctate keratopathy and hyperpigmentation of eyelid at baseline, 4, and 12 weeks. Additionally noted were adverse events and patient preferences, measured using a questionnaire at study initiation and at 12 weeks.Results: At baseline, IOPs were (Group A: 14.1 ± 2.9 mmHg, B: 14.5 ± 2.9 mmHg; P = 0.658), (Group A: 13.8 ± 2.6 mmHg, B: 14.3 ± 2.8 mmHg; P = 0.715) at 4 weeks, and (Group A: 14.1 ± 2.7 mmHg, B: 14.2 ± 2.7 mmHg; P = 0.538) at 12 weeks. Among the groups, there was no significant difference at any time point after baseline (P = 0.923, 0.951, respectively). All adverse events were not remarkably different after therapy. In regards to patient preference before and after switching therapy, 10 patients (50%) in Group A and 10 patients (63%) in Group B preferred using fixed-combination eye drop therapy.Conclusions: Effectiveness and safety were maintained in both groups after switching therapy. Overall, patients generally preferred using a fixed-combination therapy.Keywords: glaucoma, latanoprost–timolol, dorzolamide–timolol, brinzolamide, fixed combination, intraocular pressure
url http://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-the-latanoprost-0005timolol-05--brinzolamide-1-versus-do-a9416
work_keys_str_mv AT kanamotot comparisonofthelatanoprost0005timolol05brinzolamide1versusdorzolamide1timolol05latanoprost0005a12weekrandomizedopenlabeltrial
AT andon comparisonofthelatanoprost0005timolol05brinzolamide1versusdorzolamide1timolol05latanoprost0005a12weekrandomizedopenlabeltrial
AT maruiwaf comparisonofthelatanoprost0005timolol05brinzolamide1versusdorzolamide1timolol05latanoprost0005a12weekrandomizedopenlabeltrial
AT babay comparisonofthelatanoprost0005timolol05brinzolamide1versusdorzolamide1timolol05latanoprost0005a12weekrandomizedopenlabeltrial
AT nakakuras comparisonofthelatanoprost0005timolol05brinzolamide1versusdorzolamide1timolol05latanoprost0005a12weekrandomizedopenlabeltrial
AT tabuchih comparisonofthelatanoprost0005timolol05brinzolamide1versusdorzolamide1timolol05latanoprost0005a12weekrandomizedopenlabeltrial
AT kiuchiy comparisonofthelatanoprost0005timolol05brinzolamide1versusdorzolamide1timolol05latanoprost0005a12weekrandomizedopenlabeltrial
_version_ 1724790416391274496