Kritik Atas Sunah Sebagai Bagian Tafsīr bi al-Ma’sūr: Menyoal Otoritas Sunah Sebagai Acuan Penafsiran dalam Tafsīr Al-Jalālain

Tafsīr al-Jalālai, like Tafsīral-Maḥallī andas-Suyūṭī, has not been created from a vacuum, but from a specific context of social reality which is laden with certain ideologies. The questionsthat follow then are how al-Maḥallī and as-Suyūṭīhave put their own ideological genre into Tafsīr al-Jalālain...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M Miski
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: IAIN Pekalongan 2017-05-01
Series:Religia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://e-journal.iainpekalongan.ac.id/index.php/Religia/article/view/838
id doaj-e7d402fd3a584ccdaa800e8dd42dc4cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e7d402fd3a584ccdaa800e8dd42dc4cc2020-11-25T00:51:38ZaraIAIN PekalonganReligia1411-16322527-59922017-05-01496910.28918/religia.v20i1.838838Kritik Atas Sunah Sebagai Bagian Tafsīr bi al-Ma’sūr: Menyoal Otoritas Sunah Sebagai Acuan Penafsiran dalam Tafsīr Al-JalālainM MiskiTafsīr al-Jalālai, like Tafsīral-Maḥallī andas-Suyūṭī, has not been created from a vacuum, but from a specific context of social reality which is laden with certain ideologies. The questionsthat follow then are how al-Maḥallī and as-Suyūṭīhave put their own ideological genre into Tafsīr al-Jalālain when interpreting al-Qur’an and how this ideological preference in turn brings about theoretical implications for tafsīr bi al-ma’sūr? This paper adopts the perspective of constructionism and that of literature study. The primary data were Tafsīr al-Jalālain, which were analysed by means of intertextuality. The main findings revealed that Sunah in the Tafsīr al-Jalālain have been selected and sorted out in accordance with an ideological genre of Syafii. Building on these observations, we concluded that the existence of SunahNabi which are part of tafsīr bi al-ma‘ṡūr (an-Naql), despite being hailed as the most authoritative interpretation of al-Qur’an, tends to be biased and, therefore, its generalizability should be interpreted with caution. We suggested that there should be a more specific terminology in between al-Qur’an that is interpreted by Nabi himself (i.e., at-Tafsīr an-Nabawī), which tends to be neutral, and  al-Qur’an that is interpreted by scholars through the lens of SunahNabi (at-Tafsīr bi as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah), which is undoubtedlyvulnerable to the interest of these scholarshttp://e-journal.iainpekalongan.ac.id/index.php/Religia/article/view/838Tafsīr bi al-Ma’sūr, sunah, Tafsīr al-Jalālain
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M Miski
spellingShingle M Miski
Kritik Atas Sunah Sebagai Bagian Tafsīr bi al-Ma’sūr: Menyoal Otoritas Sunah Sebagai Acuan Penafsiran dalam Tafsīr Al-Jalālain
Religia
Tafsīr bi al-Ma’sūr, sunah, Tafsīr al-Jalālain
author_facet M Miski
author_sort M Miski
title Kritik Atas Sunah Sebagai Bagian Tafsīr bi al-Ma’sūr: Menyoal Otoritas Sunah Sebagai Acuan Penafsiran dalam Tafsīr Al-Jalālain
title_short Kritik Atas Sunah Sebagai Bagian Tafsīr bi al-Ma’sūr: Menyoal Otoritas Sunah Sebagai Acuan Penafsiran dalam Tafsīr Al-Jalālain
title_full Kritik Atas Sunah Sebagai Bagian Tafsīr bi al-Ma’sūr: Menyoal Otoritas Sunah Sebagai Acuan Penafsiran dalam Tafsīr Al-Jalālain
title_fullStr Kritik Atas Sunah Sebagai Bagian Tafsīr bi al-Ma’sūr: Menyoal Otoritas Sunah Sebagai Acuan Penafsiran dalam Tafsīr Al-Jalālain
title_full_unstemmed Kritik Atas Sunah Sebagai Bagian Tafsīr bi al-Ma’sūr: Menyoal Otoritas Sunah Sebagai Acuan Penafsiran dalam Tafsīr Al-Jalālain
title_sort kritik atas sunah sebagai bagian tafsīr bi al-ma’sūr: menyoal otoritas sunah sebagai acuan penafsiran dalam tafsīr al-jalālain
publisher IAIN Pekalongan
series Religia
issn 1411-1632
2527-5992
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Tafsīr al-Jalālai, like Tafsīral-Maḥallī andas-Suyūṭī, has not been created from a vacuum, but from a specific context of social reality which is laden with certain ideologies. The questionsthat follow then are how al-Maḥallī and as-Suyūṭīhave put their own ideological genre into Tafsīr al-Jalālain when interpreting al-Qur’an and how this ideological preference in turn brings about theoretical implications for tafsīr bi al-ma’sūr? This paper adopts the perspective of constructionism and that of literature study. The primary data were Tafsīr al-Jalālain, which were analysed by means of intertextuality. The main findings revealed that Sunah in the Tafsīr al-Jalālain have been selected and sorted out in accordance with an ideological genre of Syafii. Building on these observations, we concluded that the existence of SunahNabi which are part of tafsīr bi al-ma‘ṡūr (an-Naql), despite being hailed as the most authoritative interpretation of al-Qur’an, tends to be biased and, therefore, its generalizability should be interpreted with caution. We suggested that there should be a more specific terminology in between al-Qur’an that is interpreted by Nabi himself (i.e., at-Tafsīr an-Nabawī), which tends to be neutral, and  al-Qur’an that is interpreted by scholars through the lens of SunahNabi (at-Tafsīr bi as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah), which is undoubtedlyvulnerable to the interest of these scholars
topic Tafsīr bi al-Ma’sūr, sunah, Tafsīr al-Jalālain
url http://e-journal.iainpekalongan.ac.id/index.php/Religia/article/view/838
work_keys_str_mv AT mmiski kritikatassunahsebagaibagiantafsirbialmasurmenyoalotoritassunahsebagaiacuanpenafsirandalamtafsiraljalalain
_version_ 1725244671199805440