Concentrations of nicotine, nitrosamines, and humectants in legal and illegal cigarettes in Mexico

Abstract Background Article 10 of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control states the need for industry disclosure of tobacco contents and emissions. Currently, the profiles of key tobacco compounds in legal and illegal cigarettes are largely unknown. We aimed to analyze...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ariela Braverman-Bronstein, James F Thrasher, Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu, Mauricio Hernández-Ávila, Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutierrez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-10-01
Series:Harm Reduction Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12954-018-0257-3
id doaj-e7d5029ec6c64bb1a235136cff7c6a2a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e7d5029ec6c64bb1a235136cff7c6a2a2020-11-25T01:20:32ZengBMCHarm Reduction Journal1477-75172018-10-011511810.1186/s12954-018-0257-3Concentrations of nicotine, nitrosamines, and humectants in legal and illegal cigarettes in MexicoAriela Braverman-Bronstein0James F Thrasher1Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu2Mauricio Hernández-Ávila3Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutierrez4Center for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public HealthArnold School of Public Health, University of South CarolinaCenter for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public HealthNational Institute of Public HealthCenter for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public HealthAbstract Background Article 10 of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control states the need for industry disclosure of tobacco contents and emissions. Currently, the profiles of key tobacco compounds in legal and illegal cigarettes are largely unknown. We aimed to analyze and compare concentrations of nicotine, nitrosamines, and humectants in legal and illegal cigarettes collected from a representative sample of smokers. Methods Participants of the International Tobacco Control cohort provided a cigarette pack of the brand they smoked during the 2014 wave. Brands were classified as legal or illegal according to the Mexican legislation. Nicotine, nitrosamines, glycerol, propylene glycol, and pH were quantified in seven randomly selected packs of each brand. All analyses were done blinded to legality status. Average concentrations per brand and global averages for legal and illegal brands were calculated. Comparisons between legal and illegal brands were conducted using t tests. Results Participants provided 76 different brands, from which 6.8% were illegal. Legal brands had higher nicotine (15.05 ± 1.89 mg/g vs 12.09 ± 2.69 mg/g; p < 0001), glycerol (12.98 ± 8.03 vs 2.93 ± 1.96 mg/g; p < 0.001), and N-nitrosanatabine (NAT) (1087.5 ± 127.0 vs 738.5 ± 338 ng/g; p = 0.006) concentrations compared to illegal brands. For all other compounds, legal and illegal brands had similar concentrations. Conclusion Compared to illegal cigarettes, legal brands seem to have higher concentrations of nicotine, NAT, and glycerol. Efforts must be made to implement and enforce Article 10 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control to provide transparent information to consumers, regulators, and policy-makers; and to limit cigarette engineering from the tobacco industry.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12954-018-0257-3Nicotine or derivativesTobacco constituentsLegislation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ariela Braverman-Bronstein
James F Thrasher
Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu
Mauricio Hernández-Ávila
Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutierrez
spellingShingle Ariela Braverman-Bronstein
James F Thrasher
Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu
Mauricio Hernández-Ávila
Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutierrez
Concentrations of nicotine, nitrosamines, and humectants in legal and illegal cigarettes in Mexico
Harm Reduction Journal
Nicotine or derivatives
Tobacco constituents
Legislation
author_facet Ariela Braverman-Bronstein
James F Thrasher
Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu
Mauricio Hernández-Ávila
Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutierrez
author_sort Ariela Braverman-Bronstein
title Concentrations of nicotine, nitrosamines, and humectants in legal and illegal cigarettes in Mexico
title_short Concentrations of nicotine, nitrosamines, and humectants in legal and illegal cigarettes in Mexico
title_full Concentrations of nicotine, nitrosamines, and humectants in legal and illegal cigarettes in Mexico
title_fullStr Concentrations of nicotine, nitrosamines, and humectants in legal and illegal cigarettes in Mexico
title_full_unstemmed Concentrations of nicotine, nitrosamines, and humectants in legal and illegal cigarettes in Mexico
title_sort concentrations of nicotine, nitrosamines, and humectants in legal and illegal cigarettes in mexico
publisher BMC
series Harm Reduction Journal
issn 1477-7517
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Abstract Background Article 10 of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control states the need for industry disclosure of tobacco contents and emissions. Currently, the profiles of key tobacco compounds in legal and illegal cigarettes are largely unknown. We aimed to analyze and compare concentrations of nicotine, nitrosamines, and humectants in legal and illegal cigarettes collected from a representative sample of smokers. Methods Participants of the International Tobacco Control cohort provided a cigarette pack of the brand they smoked during the 2014 wave. Brands were classified as legal or illegal according to the Mexican legislation. Nicotine, nitrosamines, glycerol, propylene glycol, and pH were quantified in seven randomly selected packs of each brand. All analyses were done blinded to legality status. Average concentrations per brand and global averages for legal and illegal brands were calculated. Comparisons between legal and illegal brands were conducted using t tests. Results Participants provided 76 different brands, from which 6.8% were illegal. Legal brands had higher nicotine (15.05 ± 1.89 mg/g vs 12.09 ± 2.69 mg/g; p < 0001), glycerol (12.98 ± 8.03 vs 2.93 ± 1.96 mg/g; p < 0.001), and N-nitrosanatabine (NAT) (1087.5 ± 127.0 vs 738.5 ± 338 ng/g; p = 0.006) concentrations compared to illegal brands. For all other compounds, legal and illegal brands had similar concentrations. Conclusion Compared to illegal cigarettes, legal brands seem to have higher concentrations of nicotine, NAT, and glycerol. Efforts must be made to implement and enforce Article 10 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control to provide transparent information to consumers, regulators, and policy-makers; and to limit cigarette engineering from the tobacco industry.
topic Nicotine or derivatives
Tobacco constituents
Legislation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12954-018-0257-3
work_keys_str_mv AT arielabravermanbronstein concentrationsofnicotinenitrosaminesandhumectantsinlegalandillegalcigarettesinmexico
AT jamesfthrasher concentrationsofnicotinenitrosaminesandhumectantsinlegalandillegalcigarettesinmexico
AT luzmyriamreynalesshigematsu concentrationsofnicotinenitrosaminesandhumectantsinlegalandillegalcigarettesinmexico
AT mauriciohernandezavila concentrationsofnicotinenitrosaminesandhumectantsinlegalandillegalcigarettesinmexico
AT tonatiuhbarrientosgutierrez concentrationsofnicotinenitrosaminesandhumectantsinlegalandillegalcigarettesinmexico
_version_ 1725133702896287744