L’intimité, la fiabilité et les paroles des femmes : quand les violences conjugales rencontrent les institutions
In this article I wish to analyze the conundrums arising when battered women's words meet institutions and law. In the context of intimate partner violence documentary evidence is often not available and women’s testimonies play an essential role. Pressing charges and speaking out means taking...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Italian |
Published: |
Dipartimento Culture e Società - Università di Palermo
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Archivio Antropologico Mediterraneo |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/aam/2883 |
id |
doaj-e7da2c13d96348bd9f3cc11c6adcc85f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e7da2c13d96348bd9f3cc11c6adcc85f2020-11-25T03:52:41ZitaDipartimento Culture e Società - Università di PalermoArchivio Antropologico Mediterraneo2038-32152020-06-01232210.4000/aam.2883L’intimité, la fiabilité et les paroles des femmes : quand les violences conjugales rencontrent les institutionsAlessandra GribaldoIn this article I wish to analyze the conundrums arising when battered women's words meet institutions and law. In the context of intimate partner violence documentary evidence is often not available and women’s testimonies play an essential role. Pressing charges and speaking out means taking the floor as a legal subject in order to demand justice and to speak in legal terms has a decisive, effective and symbolic value in the definition of victimhood. Nonetheless the pressure on the victim to speak about the factual events, about herself and her relationship with the perpetrator and to denounce him before the law has vast implications. Drawing on a research carried out in Italy, I reflect on how violence in intimate relationships can be made present to the institutions and how the abused subject is constituted in front of them. Self-governance and reflexivity make testimony intelligible and legally significant and make women reliable victims. Yet paradoxically violence exerted in an intimate relationship does not easily provide for such a perfect victim: this reliable subject that institutions require does not match women's experiences, stances, decisions, hesitations.http://journals.openedition.org/aam/2883domestic violencelawinstitutionsgenderintimacy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Italian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alessandra Gribaldo |
spellingShingle |
Alessandra Gribaldo L’intimité, la fiabilité et les paroles des femmes : quand les violences conjugales rencontrent les institutions Archivio Antropologico Mediterraneo domestic violence law institutions gender intimacy |
author_facet |
Alessandra Gribaldo |
author_sort |
Alessandra Gribaldo |
title |
L’intimité, la fiabilité et les paroles des femmes : quand les violences conjugales rencontrent les institutions |
title_short |
L’intimité, la fiabilité et les paroles des femmes : quand les violences conjugales rencontrent les institutions |
title_full |
L’intimité, la fiabilité et les paroles des femmes : quand les violences conjugales rencontrent les institutions |
title_fullStr |
L’intimité, la fiabilité et les paroles des femmes : quand les violences conjugales rencontrent les institutions |
title_full_unstemmed |
L’intimité, la fiabilité et les paroles des femmes : quand les violences conjugales rencontrent les institutions |
title_sort |
l’intimité, la fiabilité et les paroles des femmes : quand les violences conjugales rencontrent les institutions |
publisher |
Dipartimento Culture e Società - Università di Palermo |
series |
Archivio Antropologico Mediterraneo |
issn |
2038-3215 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
In this article I wish to analyze the conundrums arising when battered women's words meet institutions and law. In the context of intimate partner violence documentary evidence is often not available and women’s testimonies play an essential role. Pressing charges and speaking out means taking the floor as a legal subject in order to demand justice and to speak in legal terms has a decisive, effective and symbolic value in the definition of victimhood. Nonetheless the pressure on the victim to speak about the factual events, about herself and her relationship with the perpetrator and to denounce him before the law has vast implications. Drawing on a research carried out in Italy, I reflect on how violence in intimate relationships can be made present to the institutions and how the abused subject is constituted in front of them. Self-governance and reflexivity make testimony intelligible and legally significant and make women reliable victims. Yet paradoxically violence exerted in an intimate relationship does not easily provide for such a perfect victim: this reliable subject that institutions require does not match women's experiences, stances, decisions, hesitations. |
topic |
domestic violence law institutions gender intimacy |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/aam/2883 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alessandragribaldo lintimitelafiabiliteetlesparolesdesfemmesquandlesviolencesconjugalesrencontrentlesinstitutions |
_version_ |
1724481488001433600 |