Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: A treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Results of meta-analyses of randomized trials comparing PEG and NaP are inconsistent and have not included trials comparing either or both preps to less traditional ones.</p> <p><b>AIM:</b> To perform a meta-a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Imperiale Thomas F, Eckert George, Juluri Ravi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-04-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/11/38
id doaj-e82c8d4ebd374ab0acf8ea9aaab795fa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e82c8d4ebd374ab0acf8ea9aaab795fa2020-11-25T02:02:26ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2011-04-011113810.1186/1471-230X-11-38Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: A treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsImperiale Thomas FEckert GeorgeJuluri Ravi<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Results of meta-analyses of randomized trials comparing PEG and NaP are inconsistent and have not included trials comparing either or both preps to less traditional ones.</p> <p><b>AIM:</b> To perform a meta-analysis by treatment arm.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using MEDLINE and EMBASE, we identified English-language trials published from 1990 to 2008 that included PEG and/or NaP, and aggregated them by treatment arm into: 4 liter (L) PEG; 2 L PEG; split-dose PEG; two 45 ml doses of NaP +/- adjunctive medication; and NaP tablets. We compared prep quality and the proportion completing the prep.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Among 71 trials (patient N = 10,201), excellent prep quality was present in 34% (CI, 26-41%) for 4 L PEG alone; 39% (CI, 26-51%) for 2 L PEG; 37% (CI, 28-46%) for split-dose PEG; 42% (CI, 33-51%) for NaP solution; 44% (CI, 38-51%) for NaP with adjunctive meds; and 58% (CI, 49-67%) for NaP tablets. Patients receiving NaP were more likely to complete the prep (97% [CI, 96-98%] vs. 90% [CI, 87-92%] for 4L PEG alone); however, completion rates for 2L PEG (98%) and split dose PEG (95%) were similar to NaP.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>NaP tablets resulted in better prep quality and higher completion rates compared to other regimens. In comparisons limited by sample size, split dose PEG was not statistically different from NaP solution for completion rate or prep quality.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/11/38ColonoscopyBowel preparationPolyethylene GlycolSodium Phosphate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Imperiale Thomas F
Eckert George
Juluri Ravi
spellingShingle Imperiale Thomas F
Eckert George
Juluri Ravi
Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: A treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BMC Gastroenterology
Colonoscopy
Bowel preparation
Polyethylene Glycol
Sodium Phosphate
author_facet Imperiale Thomas F
Eckert George
Juluri Ravi
author_sort Imperiale Thomas F
title Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: A treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: A treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: A treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: A treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: A treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
publisher BMC
series BMC Gastroenterology
issn 1471-230X
publishDate 2011-04-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Results of meta-analyses of randomized trials comparing PEG and NaP are inconsistent and have not included trials comparing either or both preps to less traditional ones.</p> <p><b>AIM:</b> To perform a meta-analysis by treatment arm.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using MEDLINE and EMBASE, we identified English-language trials published from 1990 to 2008 that included PEG and/or NaP, and aggregated them by treatment arm into: 4 liter (L) PEG; 2 L PEG; split-dose PEG; two 45 ml doses of NaP +/- adjunctive medication; and NaP tablets. We compared prep quality and the proportion completing the prep.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Among 71 trials (patient N = 10,201), excellent prep quality was present in 34% (CI, 26-41%) for 4 L PEG alone; 39% (CI, 26-51%) for 2 L PEG; 37% (CI, 28-46%) for split-dose PEG; 42% (CI, 33-51%) for NaP solution; 44% (CI, 38-51%) for NaP with adjunctive meds; and 58% (CI, 49-67%) for NaP tablets. Patients receiving NaP were more likely to complete the prep (97% [CI, 96-98%] vs. 90% [CI, 87-92%] for 4L PEG alone); however, completion rates for 2L PEG (98%) and split dose PEG (95%) were similar to NaP.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>NaP tablets resulted in better prep quality and higher completion rates compared to other regimens. In comparisons limited by sample size, split dose PEG was not statistically different from NaP solution for completion rate or prep quality.</p>
topic Colonoscopy
Bowel preparation
Polyethylene Glycol
Sodium Phosphate
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/11/38
work_keys_str_mv AT imperialethomasf polyethyleneglycolvssodiumphosphateforbowelpreparationatreatmentarmmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT eckertgeorge polyethyleneglycolvssodiumphosphateforbowelpreparationatreatmentarmmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT juluriravi polyethyleneglycolvssodiumphosphateforbowelpreparationatreatmentarmmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1724952956216803328