Open Surgical versus Minimal Invasive Necrosectomy of the Pancreas-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of the German Pancreatitis Study Group.

Necrotising pancreatitis, and particularly infected necrosis, are still associated with high morbidity and mortality. Since 2011, a step-up approach with lower morbidity rates compared to initial open necrosectomy has been established. However, mortality and complication rates of this complex treatm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Rasch, Veit Phillip, Stephanie Reichel, Bettina Rau, Christian Zapf, Jonas Rosendahl, Ulrich Halm, Markus Zachäus, Martin Müller, Alexander Kleger, Albrecht Neesse, Jochen Hampe, Mark Ellrichmann, Felix Rückert, Peter Strauß, Alexander Arlt, Volker Ellenrieder, Thomas M Gress, Werner Hartwig, Ernst Klar, Joachim Mössner, Stefan Post, Roland M Schmid, Thomas Seufferlein, Marco Siech, Jens Werner, Uwe Will, Hana Algül
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5036800?pdf=render
id doaj-e840e70fa094454ab757433d017cf08c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e840e70fa094454ab757433d017cf08c2020-11-25T01:42:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01119e016365110.1371/journal.pone.0163651Open Surgical versus Minimal Invasive Necrosectomy of the Pancreas-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of the German Pancreatitis Study Group.Sebastian RaschVeit PhillipStephanie ReichelBettina RauChristian ZapfJonas RosendahlUlrich HalmMarkus ZachäusMartin MüllerAlexander KlegerAlbrecht NeesseJochen HampeMark EllrichmannFelix RückertPeter StraußAlexander ArltVolker EllenriederThomas M GressWerner HartwigErnst KlarJoachim MössnerStefan PostRoland M SchmidThomas SeufferleinMarco SiechJens WernerUwe WillHana AlgülNecrotising pancreatitis, and particularly infected necrosis, are still associated with high morbidity and mortality. Since 2011, a step-up approach with lower morbidity rates compared to initial open necrosectomy has been established. However, mortality and complication rates of this complex treatment are hardly studied thereafter.The German Pancreatitis Study Group performed a multicenter, retrospective study including 220 patients with necrotising pancreatitis requiring intervention, treated at 10 hospitals in Germany between January 2008 and June 2014. Data were analysed for the primary endpoints "severe complications" and "mortality" as well as secondary endpoints including "length of hospital stay", "follow up", and predisposing or prognostic factors.Of all patients 13.6% were treated primarily with surgery and 86.4% underwent a step-up approach. More men (71.8%) required intervention for necrotising pancreatitis. The most frequent etiology was biliary (41.4%) followed by alcohol (29.1%). Compared to open necrosectomy, the step-up approach was associated with a lower number of severe complications (primary composite endpoint including sepsis, persistent multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and erosion bleeding: 44.7% vs. 73.3%), lower mortality (10.5% vs. 33.3%) and lower rates of diabetes mellitus type 3c (4.7% vs. 33.3%). Low hematocrit and low blood urea nitrogen at admission as well as a history of acute pancreatitis were prognostic for less complications in necrotising pancreatitis. A combination of drainage with endoscopic necrosectomy resulted in the lowest rate of severe complications.A step-up approach starting with minimal invasive drainage techniques and endoscopic necrosectomy results in a significant reduction of morbidity and mortality in necrotising pancreatitis compared to a primarily surgical intervention.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5036800?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Rasch
Veit Phillip
Stephanie Reichel
Bettina Rau
Christian Zapf
Jonas Rosendahl
Ulrich Halm
Markus Zachäus
Martin Müller
Alexander Kleger
Albrecht Neesse
Jochen Hampe
Mark Ellrichmann
Felix Rückert
Peter Strauß
Alexander Arlt
Volker Ellenrieder
Thomas M Gress
Werner Hartwig
Ernst Klar
Joachim Mössner
Stefan Post
Roland M Schmid
Thomas Seufferlein
Marco Siech
Jens Werner
Uwe Will
Hana Algül
spellingShingle Sebastian Rasch
Veit Phillip
Stephanie Reichel
Bettina Rau
Christian Zapf
Jonas Rosendahl
Ulrich Halm
Markus Zachäus
Martin Müller
Alexander Kleger
Albrecht Neesse
Jochen Hampe
Mark Ellrichmann
Felix Rückert
Peter Strauß
Alexander Arlt
Volker Ellenrieder
Thomas M Gress
Werner Hartwig
Ernst Klar
Joachim Mössner
Stefan Post
Roland M Schmid
Thomas Seufferlein
Marco Siech
Jens Werner
Uwe Will
Hana Algül
Open Surgical versus Minimal Invasive Necrosectomy of the Pancreas-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of the German Pancreatitis Study Group.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sebastian Rasch
Veit Phillip
Stephanie Reichel
Bettina Rau
Christian Zapf
Jonas Rosendahl
Ulrich Halm
Markus Zachäus
Martin Müller
Alexander Kleger
Albrecht Neesse
Jochen Hampe
Mark Ellrichmann
Felix Rückert
Peter Strauß
Alexander Arlt
Volker Ellenrieder
Thomas M Gress
Werner Hartwig
Ernst Klar
Joachim Mössner
Stefan Post
Roland M Schmid
Thomas Seufferlein
Marco Siech
Jens Werner
Uwe Will
Hana Algül
author_sort Sebastian Rasch
title Open Surgical versus Minimal Invasive Necrosectomy of the Pancreas-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of the German Pancreatitis Study Group.
title_short Open Surgical versus Minimal Invasive Necrosectomy of the Pancreas-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of the German Pancreatitis Study Group.
title_full Open Surgical versus Minimal Invasive Necrosectomy of the Pancreas-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of the German Pancreatitis Study Group.
title_fullStr Open Surgical versus Minimal Invasive Necrosectomy of the Pancreas-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of the German Pancreatitis Study Group.
title_full_unstemmed Open Surgical versus Minimal Invasive Necrosectomy of the Pancreas-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis of the German Pancreatitis Study Group.
title_sort open surgical versus minimal invasive necrosectomy of the pancreas-a retrospective multicenter analysis of the german pancreatitis study group.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Necrotising pancreatitis, and particularly infected necrosis, are still associated with high morbidity and mortality. Since 2011, a step-up approach with lower morbidity rates compared to initial open necrosectomy has been established. However, mortality and complication rates of this complex treatment are hardly studied thereafter.The German Pancreatitis Study Group performed a multicenter, retrospective study including 220 patients with necrotising pancreatitis requiring intervention, treated at 10 hospitals in Germany between January 2008 and June 2014. Data were analysed for the primary endpoints "severe complications" and "mortality" as well as secondary endpoints including "length of hospital stay", "follow up", and predisposing or prognostic factors.Of all patients 13.6% were treated primarily with surgery and 86.4% underwent a step-up approach. More men (71.8%) required intervention for necrotising pancreatitis. The most frequent etiology was biliary (41.4%) followed by alcohol (29.1%). Compared to open necrosectomy, the step-up approach was associated with a lower number of severe complications (primary composite endpoint including sepsis, persistent multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and erosion bleeding: 44.7% vs. 73.3%), lower mortality (10.5% vs. 33.3%) and lower rates of diabetes mellitus type 3c (4.7% vs. 33.3%). Low hematocrit and low blood urea nitrogen at admission as well as a history of acute pancreatitis were prognostic for less complications in necrotising pancreatitis. A combination of drainage with endoscopic necrosectomy resulted in the lowest rate of severe complications.A step-up approach starting with minimal invasive drainage techniques and endoscopic necrosectomy results in a significant reduction of morbidity and mortality in necrotising pancreatitis compared to a primarily surgical intervention.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5036800?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianrasch opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT veitphillip opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT stephaniereichel opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT bettinarau opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT christianzapf opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT jonasrosendahl opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT ulrichhalm opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT markuszachaus opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT martinmuller opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT alexanderkleger opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT albrechtneesse opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT jochenhampe opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT markellrichmann opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT felixruckert opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT peterstrauß opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT alexanderarlt opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT volkerellenrieder opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT thomasmgress opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT wernerhartwig opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT ernstklar opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT joachimmossner opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT stefanpost opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT rolandmschmid opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT thomasseufferlein opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT marcosiech opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT jenswerner opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT uwewill opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
AT hanaalgul opensurgicalversusminimalinvasivenecrosectomyofthepancreasaretrospectivemulticenteranalysisofthegermanpancreatitisstudygroup
_version_ 1725038196869300224