Comparison of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft, Semitendinosus–Gracilis Graft and Semitendinosus–Gracilis with Preserved Tibial Insertion Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Sports Persons

INTRODUCTION: Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and semitendinosus–gracilis (STG) are the commonest grafts used for ACL reconstruction. However even after having been debated for years, there is no consensus about the ideal graft. Moreover, the literature is deficient about STG graft with preserved t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soni A, Gupta RK, Raghav M, Masih GD, Bansal P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2021-07-01
Series:Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.morthoj.org/2021/v15n2/anterior-cruciate-sports.pdf
id doaj-e8810348ec9749df83a5ff2bb38d2d81
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e8810348ec9749df83a5ff2bb38d2d812021-09-06T07:26:33ZengMalaysian Orthopaedic AssociationMalaysian Orthopaedic Journal1985-25332232-111X2021-07-01152121710.5704/MOJ.2107.003Comparison of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft, Semitendinosus–Gracilis Graft and Semitendinosus–Gracilis with Preserved Tibial Insertion Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Sports PersonsSoni A0Gupta RK1Raghav M2Masih GD3Bansal P4MSMSMScMScMBBSINTRODUCTION: Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and semitendinosus–gracilis (STG) are the commonest grafts used for ACL reconstruction. However even after having been debated for years, there is no consensus about the ideal graft. Moreover, the literature is deficient about STG graft with preserved tibial insertion (STGPI) which preserves the proprioception. Our aim is to compare the outcome of BPTB, free STG and STGPI grafts after ACL reconstruction in professional sports persons. We compared the outcome in terms of mechanical stability, functional outcome, return to sports activity and degenerative changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Professional sports persons aged between 16-50 years operated for ACL tear using BPTB, free STG and STGPI grafts with minimum follow-up of two years were identified from hospital records. Patients with associated knee injuries were excluded. Patients, divided in three groups according to graft used, were compared in terms of mechanical stability (arthrometric examination KT-1000 score), functional outcome (Lysholm Score), return to sports activity (Tegner score and difference in thigh circumference) and degenerative changes (KL grading). RESULTS: BPTB graft group was found to be better than free STG and STGPI graft groups in terms of KT-1000 score. There was no statistically significant difference among the groups in terms of Lysholm score, Tegner score, difference in thigh circumference and KL grading. CONCLUSION: BPTB graft is better than free STG and STGPI grafts in terms of knee stability. When compared for patient reported outcome, return to sports activity, osteoarthritic changes and graft failure there is no significant difference among the three types of grafts.https://www.morthoj.org/2021/v15n2/anterior-cruciate-sports.pdfcruciate ligamentreconstructiongraftsemitendinosusgracilis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Soni A
Gupta RK
Raghav M
Masih GD
Bansal P
spellingShingle Soni A
Gupta RK
Raghav M
Masih GD
Bansal P
Comparison of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft, Semitendinosus–Gracilis Graft and Semitendinosus–Gracilis with Preserved Tibial Insertion Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Sports Persons
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
cruciate ligament
reconstruction
graft
semitendinosus
gracilis
author_facet Soni A
Gupta RK
Raghav M
Masih GD
Bansal P
author_sort Soni A
title Comparison of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft, Semitendinosus–Gracilis Graft and Semitendinosus–Gracilis with Preserved Tibial Insertion Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Sports Persons
title_short Comparison of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft, Semitendinosus–Gracilis Graft and Semitendinosus–Gracilis with Preserved Tibial Insertion Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Sports Persons
title_full Comparison of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft, Semitendinosus–Gracilis Graft and Semitendinosus–Gracilis with Preserved Tibial Insertion Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Sports Persons
title_fullStr Comparison of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft, Semitendinosus–Gracilis Graft and Semitendinosus–Gracilis with Preserved Tibial Insertion Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Sports Persons
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft, Semitendinosus–Gracilis Graft and Semitendinosus–Gracilis with Preserved Tibial Insertion Graft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Sports Persons
title_sort comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone graft, semitendinosus–gracilis graft and semitendinosus–gracilis with preserved tibial insertion graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sports persons
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
series Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
issn 1985-2533
2232-111X
publishDate 2021-07-01
description INTRODUCTION: Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and semitendinosus–gracilis (STG) are the commonest grafts used for ACL reconstruction. However even after having been debated for years, there is no consensus about the ideal graft. Moreover, the literature is deficient about STG graft with preserved tibial insertion (STGPI) which preserves the proprioception. Our aim is to compare the outcome of BPTB, free STG and STGPI grafts after ACL reconstruction in professional sports persons. We compared the outcome in terms of mechanical stability, functional outcome, return to sports activity and degenerative changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Professional sports persons aged between 16-50 years operated for ACL tear using BPTB, free STG and STGPI grafts with minimum follow-up of two years were identified from hospital records. Patients with associated knee injuries were excluded. Patients, divided in three groups according to graft used, were compared in terms of mechanical stability (arthrometric examination KT-1000 score), functional outcome (Lysholm Score), return to sports activity (Tegner score and difference in thigh circumference) and degenerative changes (KL grading). RESULTS: BPTB graft group was found to be better than free STG and STGPI graft groups in terms of KT-1000 score. There was no statistically significant difference among the groups in terms of Lysholm score, Tegner score, difference in thigh circumference and KL grading. CONCLUSION: BPTB graft is better than free STG and STGPI grafts in terms of knee stability. When compared for patient reported outcome, return to sports activity, osteoarthritic changes and graft failure there is no significant difference among the three types of grafts.
topic cruciate ligament
reconstruction
graft
semitendinosus
gracilis
url https://www.morthoj.org/2021/v15n2/anterior-cruciate-sports.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sonia comparisonofbonepatellartendonbonegraftsemitendinosusgracilisgraftandsemitendinosusgraciliswithpreservedtibialinsertiongraftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninsportspersons
AT guptark comparisonofbonepatellartendonbonegraftsemitendinosusgracilisgraftandsemitendinosusgraciliswithpreservedtibialinsertiongraftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninsportspersons
AT raghavm comparisonofbonepatellartendonbonegraftsemitendinosusgracilisgraftandsemitendinosusgraciliswithpreservedtibialinsertiongraftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninsportspersons
AT masihgd comparisonofbonepatellartendonbonegraftsemitendinosusgracilisgraftandsemitendinosusgraciliswithpreservedtibialinsertiongraftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninsportspersons
AT bansalp comparisonofbonepatellartendonbonegraftsemitendinosusgracilisgraftandsemitendinosusgraciliswithpreservedtibialinsertiongraftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioninsportspersons
_version_ 1717779882600038400