Children use statistics and semantics in the retreat from overgeneralization.

How do children learn to restrict their productivity and avoid ungrammatical utterances? The present study addresses this question by examining why some verbs are used with un- prefixation (e.g., unwrap) and others are not (e.g., *unsqueeze). Experiment 1 used a priming methodology to examine childr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryan P Blything, Ben Ambridge, Elena V M Lieven
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4198212?pdf=render
id doaj-e881fa2dab4246699d0203d693b54b20
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e881fa2dab4246699d0203d693b54b202020-11-25T00:40:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01910e11000910.1371/journal.pone.0110009Children use statistics and semantics in the retreat from overgeneralization.Ryan P BlythingBen AmbridgeElena V M LievenHow do children learn to restrict their productivity and avoid ungrammatical utterances? The present study addresses this question by examining why some verbs are used with un- prefixation (e.g., unwrap) and others are not (e.g., *unsqueeze). Experiment 1 used a priming methodology to examine children's (3-4; 5-6) grammatical restrictions on verbal un- prefixation. To elicit production of un-prefixed verbs, test trials were preceded by a prime sentence, which described reversal actions with grammatical un- prefixed verbs (e.g., Marge folded her arms and then she unfolded them). Children then completed target sentences by describing cartoon reversal actions corresponding to (potentially) un- prefixed verbs. The younger age-group's production probability of verbs in un- form was negatively related to the frequency of the target verb in bare form (e.g., squeez/e/ed/es/ing), while the production probability of verbs in un- form for both age groups was negatively predicted by the frequency of synonyms to a verb's un- form (e.g., release/*unsqueeze). In Experiment 2, the same children rated the grammaticality of all verbs in un- form. The older age-group's grammaticality judgments were (a) positively predicted by the extent to which each verb was semantically consistent with a semantic "cryptotype" of meanings - where "cryptotype" refers to a covert category of overlapping, probabilistic meanings that are difficult to access - hypothesised to be shared by verbs which take un-, and (b) negatively predicted by the frequency of synonyms to a verb's un- form. Taken together, these experiments demonstrate that children as young as 4;0 employ pre-emption and entrenchment to restrict generalizations, and that use of a semantic cryptotype to guide judgments of overgeneralizations is also evident by age 6;0. Thus, even early developmental accounts of children's restriction of productivity must encompass a mechanism in which a verb's semantic and statistical properties interact.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4198212?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ryan P Blything
Ben Ambridge
Elena V M Lieven
spellingShingle Ryan P Blything
Ben Ambridge
Elena V M Lieven
Children use statistics and semantics in the retreat from overgeneralization.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ryan P Blything
Ben Ambridge
Elena V M Lieven
author_sort Ryan P Blything
title Children use statistics and semantics in the retreat from overgeneralization.
title_short Children use statistics and semantics in the retreat from overgeneralization.
title_full Children use statistics and semantics in the retreat from overgeneralization.
title_fullStr Children use statistics and semantics in the retreat from overgeneralization.
title_full_unstemmed Children use statistics and semantics in the retreat from overgeneralization.
title_sort children use statistics and semantics in the retreat from overgeneralization.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description How do children learn to restrict their productivity and avoid ungrammatical utterances? The present study addresses this question by examining why some verbs are used with un- prefixation (e.g., unwrap) and others are not (e.g., *unsqueeze). Experiment 1 used a priming methodology to examine children's (3-4; 5-6) grammatical restrictions on verbal un- prefixation. To elicit production of un-prefixed verbs, test trials were preceded by a prime sentence, which described reversal actions with grammatical un- prefixed verbs (e.g., Marge folded her arms and then she unfolded them). Children then completed target sentences by describing cartoon reversal actions corresponding to (potentially) un- prefixed verbs. The younger age-group's production probability of verbs in un- form was negatively related to the frequency of the target verb in bare form (e.g., squeez/e/ed/es/ing), while the production probability of verbs in un- form for both age groups was negatively predicted by the frequency of synonyms to a verb's un- form (e.g., release/*unsqueeze). In Experiment 2, the same children rated the grammaticality of all verbs in un- form. The older age-group's grammaticality judgments were (a) positively predicted by the extent to which each verb was semantically consistent with a semantic "cryptotype" of meanings - where "cryptotype" refers to a covert category of overlapping, probabilistic meanings that are difficult to access - hypothesised to be shared by verbs which take un-, and (b) negatively predicted by the frequency of synonyms to a verb's un- form. Taken together, these experiments demonstrate that children as young as 4;0 employ pre-emption and entrenchment to restrict generalizations, and that use of a semantic cryptotype to guide judgments of overgeneralizations is also evident by age 6;0. Thus, even early developmental accounts of children's restriction of productivity must encompass a mechanism in which a verb's semantic and statistical properties interact.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4198212?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanpblything childrenusestatisticsandsemanticsintheretreatfromovergeneralization
AT benambridge childrenusestatisticsandsemanticsintheretreatfromovergeneralization
AT elenavmlieven childrenusestatisticsandsemanticsintheretreatfromovergeneralization
_version_ 1725290832694607872