Is Truth an Epistemic Goal? A Conversationalist Approach
One of the consequences of Richard Rorty’s critique of traditional epistemology is the rejection of veroteleologism, that is, the thesis according to which truth is the end or goal of inquiry. This article aims at consolidating the anti-veroteleological position, on the basis of a critical examinati...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
2010-12-01
|
Series: | Ideas y Valores |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/viewFile/10888/19590 |
id |
doaj-e89c280e25ee4390b99a198ce3cb4a93 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e89c280e25ee4390b99a198ce3cb4a932020-11-24T21:57:41ZengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaIdeas y Valores0120-00622010-12-01591448397Is Truth an Epistemic Goal? A Conversationalist ApproachFederico PenelasOne of the consequences of Richard Rorty’s critique of traditional epistemology is the rejection of veroteleologism, that is, the thesis according to which truth is the end or goal of inquiry. This article aims at consolidating the anti-veroteleological position, on the basis of a critical examination of a series of critiques made from both “realist” and Peircean-style pragmatist perspectives. Consequently, the debate centers on some considerations formulated by Alvin Goldman and Akeel Bilgrami in favor of veroteleologism and against positions such as Rorty’s.http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/viewFile/10888/19590A. BilgraniA. GoldmannR. Rortypragmatismveroteleologism. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Federico Penelas |
spellingShingle |
Federico Penelas Is Truth an Epistemic Goal? A Conversationalist Approach Ideas y Valores A. Bilgrani A. Goldmann R. Rorty pragmatism veroteleologism. |
author_facet |
Federico Penelas |
author_sort |
Federico Penelas |
title |
Is Truth an Epistemic Goal? A Conversationalist Approach |
title_short |
Is Truth an Epistemic Goal? A Conversationalist Approach |
title_full |
Is Truth an Epistemic Goal? A Conversationalist Approach |
title_fullStr |
Is Truth an Epistemic Goal? A Conversationalist Approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is Truth an Epistemic Goal? A Conversationalist Approach |
title_sort |
is truth an epistemic goal? a conversationalist approach |
publisher |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
series |
Ideas y Valores |
issn |
0120-0062 |
publishDate |
2010-12-01 |
description |
One of the consequences of Richard Rorty’s critique of traditional epistemology is the rejection of veroteleologism, that is, the thesis according to which truth is the end or goal of inquiry. This article aims at consolidating the anti-veroteleological position, on the basis of a critical examination of a series of critiques made from both “realist” and Peircean-style pragmatist perspectives. Consequently, the debate centers on some considerations formulated by Alvin Goldman and Akeel Bilgrami in favor of veroteleologism and against positions such as Rorty’s. |
topic |
A. Bilgrani A. Goldmann R. Rorty pragmatism veroteleologism. |
url |
http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/viewFile/10888/19590 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT federicopenelas istruthanepistemicgoalaconversationalistapproach |
_version_ |
1725854165870051328 |