What Makes «Communication» Possible?
The article presents sufficient space for a thorough analysis of the conceptual issues of the Communicative Programme (the CP) developed by E. Husserl, L. Wittgenstein, K.-O. Apel, and J. Habermas who attached great importance to the fundamental role of communication in epistemological justification...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
2011-06-01
|
Series: | RUDN Journal of Philosophy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11474 |
id |
doaj-e90feb6a3fe845dfab89b318506d2962 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e90feb6a3fe845dfab89b318506d29622020-11-24T23:53:23ZdeuPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN Journal of Philosophy2313-23022408-89002011-06-0102253411473What Makes «Communication» Possible?A N Pavlenko0Российский университет дружбы народовThe article presents sufficient space for a thorough analysis of the conceptual issues of the Communicative Programme (the CP) developed by E. Husserl, L. Wittgenstein, K.-O. Apel, and J. Habermas who attached great importance to the fundamental role of communication in epistemological justification. The CP analysis carried out in the article is based on a number of models worked out to provide insight into the following two arguments of the CP proponents: 1) the CP statements are justified through their universal validity; 2) There is no pure individual in the communicative society (CS). It is demonstrated that the former argument leads to a vicious circle, while the latter one - heads to overt absurdity in terms of logic.http://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11474коммуникациякоммуникативная программапорочный кругГуссерльВитгенштейнАпельХабермас |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
A N Pavlenko |
spellingShingle |
A N Pavlenko What Makes «Communication» Possible? RUDN Journal of Philosophy коммуникация коммуникативная программа порочный круг Гуссерль Витгенштейн Апель Хабермас |
author_facet |
A N Pavlenko |
author_sort |
A N Pavlenko |
title |
What Makes «Communication» Possible? |
title_short |
What Makes «Communication» Possible? |
title_full |
What Makes «Communication» Possible? |
title_fullStr |
What Makes «Communication» Possible? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What Makes «Communication» Possible? |
title_sort |
what makes «communication» possible? |
publisher |
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) |
series |
RUDN Journal of Philosophy |
issn |
2313-2302 2408-8900 |
publishDate |
2011-06-01 |
description |
The article presents sufficient space for a thorough analysis of the conceptual issues of the Communicative Programme (the CP) developed by E. Husserl, L. Wittgenstein, K.-O. Apel, and J. Habermas who attached great importance to the fundamental role of communication in epistemological justification.
The CP analysis carried out in the article is based on a number of models worked out to provide insight into the following two arguments of the CP proponents: 1) the CP statements are justified through their universal validity; 2) There is no pure individual in the communicative society (CS). It is demonstrated that the former argument leads to a vicious circle, while the latter one - heads to overt absurdity in terms of logic. |
topic |
коммуникация коммуникативная программа порочный круг Гуссерль Витгенштейн Апель Хабермас |
url |
http://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11474 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anpavlenko whatmakescommunicationpossible |
_version_ |
1725469983182422016 |