What Makes «Communication» Possible?

The article presents sufficient space for a thorough analysis of the conceptual issues of the Communicative Programme (the CP) developed by E. Husserl, L. Wittgenstein, K.-O. Apel, and J. Habermas who attached great importance to the fundamental role of communication in epistemological justification...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A N Pavlenko
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2011-06-01
Series:RUDN Journal of Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11474
id doaj-e90feb6a3fe845dfab89b318506d2962
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e90feb6a3fe845dfab89b318506d29622020-11-24T23:53:23ZdeuPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN Journal of Philosophy2313-23022408-89002011-06-0102253411473What Makes «Communication» Possible?A N Pavlenko0Российский университет дружбы народовThe article presents sufficient space for a thorough analysis of the conceptual issues of the Communicative Programme (the CP) developed by E. Husserl, L. Wittgenstein, K.-O. Apel, and J. Habermas who attached great importance to the fundamental role of communication in epistemological justification. The CP analysis carried out in the article is based on a number of models worked out to provide insight into the following two arguments of the CP proponents: 1) the CP statements are justified through their universal validity; 2) There is no pure individual in the communicative society (CS). It is demonstrated that the former argument leads to a vicious circle, while the latter one - heads to overt absurdity in terms of logic.http://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11474коммуникациякоммуникативная программапорочный кругГуссерльВитгенштейнАпельХабермас
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A N Pavlenko
spellingShingle A N Pavlenko
What Makes «Communication» Possible?
RUDN Journal of Philosophy
коммуникация
коммуникативная программа
порочный круг
Гуссерль
Витгенштейн
Апель
Хабермас
author_facet A N Pavlenko
author_sort A N Pavlenko
title What Makes «Communication» Possible?
title_short What Makes «Communication» Possible?
title_full What Makes «Communication» Possible?
title_fullStr What Makes «Communication» Possible?
title_full_unstemmed What Makes «Communication» Possible?
title_sort what makes «communication» possible?
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
series RUDN Journal of Philosophy
issn 2313-2302
2408-8900
publishDate 2011-06-01
description The article presents sufficient space for a thorough analysis of the conceptual issues of the Communicative Programme (the CP) developed by E. Husserl, L. Wittgenstein, K.-O. Apel, and J. Habermas who attached great importance to the fundamental role of communication in epistemological justification. The CP analysis carried out in the article is based on a number of models worked out to provide insight into the following two arguments of the CP proponents: 1) the CP statements are justified through their universal validity; 2) There is no pure individual in the communicative society (CS). It is demonstrated that the former argument leads to a vicious circle, while the latter one - heads to overt absurdity in terms of logic.
topic коммуникация
коммуникативная программа
порочный круг
Гуссерль
Витгенштейн
Апель
Хабермас
url http://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11474
work_keys_str_mv AT anpavlenko whatmakescommunicationpossible
_version_ 1725469983182422016