Comparative study between standard aortic valve replacement and ministernotomy aortic valve replacement
Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of the recalled upper minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) J-shaped technique and full standard median sternotomy techniques aortic valve replacement (AVR). Background Over the past 20 years, MIAVR has evolved into a safe, we...
Main Authors: | Emad Sarawy, Maged Kisho, Ahmed El Shemy |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medicine in Scientific Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jmsr.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2537-091X;year=2020;volume=3;issue=3;spage=219;epage=226;aulast=Sarawy |
Similar Items
-
J-ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement: a retrospective cohort study
by: Mohammad A. Torky, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Outcomes of the minimally invasive aortic valve replacement
by: M. A. Snegirev, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Aortic valve replacement outcome using upper ministernotomy: A prospective comparison of the upper ministernotomy and conventional full median sternotomy
by: Atsushi Tamura, et al.
Published: (2015-04-01) -
AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN PATIENT WITH FUNCTIONING CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTS
by: M. A. Snegirev, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Quality of life, satisfaction and outcomes after ministernotomy versus full sternotomy isolated aortic valve replacement (QUALITY-AVR): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
by: Emiliano A. Rodríguez-Caulo, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01)