Does Census Hiring Stimulate Jobs Growth?

Governments perform national, labor-intensive censuses on a regular schedule. Censuses represent many of the largest peacetime expansions and contractions in federal hiring. The predetermined occurrence and scale of the census offers an economic experiment in the effects of temporary government hiri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Furth Salim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2020-07-01
Series:IZA Journal of Labor Policy
Subjects:
e62
e65
h59
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/izajolp-2020-0005
id doaj-e9451d78bfa44338aa56b7307f1d01f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9451d78bfa44338aa56b7307f1d01f52021-09-05T21:02:07ZengSciendoIZA Journal of Labor Policy2193-90042020-07-0110143545710.2478/izajolp-2020-0005izajolp-2020-0005Does Census Hiring Stimulate Jobs Growth?Furth Salim0Mercatus Center at George Mason University, 3434 Washington Boulevard, ArlingtonVA 22201, USAGovernments perform national, labor-intensive censuses on a regular schedule. Censuses represent many of the largest peacetime expansions and contractions in federal hiring. The predetermined occurrence and scale of the census offers an economic experiment in the effects of temporary government hiring. This paper describes the construction of a data series on census hiring in the United States since 1950 and also collects available data on census employment in England and Wales, Canada, Korea, and Japan. Regressing total employment changes on census hiring yields coefficients extremely close to 1, indicating that there is no spillover from census hiring to the rest of the economy. Using census hiring and occurrence as instruments for government hiring in the US, Canada, and Korea, I estimate the effect of federal hiring on overall employment. Different samples yield varying jobs multipliers, with point estimates varying from -0.01 to 1.48. Including Korean and Canadian data yields lower multipliers, while including pre-1990 US data yields higher multipliers. In no specification can I reject the hypothesis that the job multiplier equals 1. In all specifications, standard errors are large enough that I can reject neither Keynesian nor crowd-out effects.https://doi.org/10.2478/izajolp-2020-0005censusgovernment employmentfiscal policye62e65h59
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Furth Salim
spellingShingle Furth Salim
Does Census Hiring Stimulate Jobs Growth?
IZA Journal of Labor Policy
census
government employment
fiscal policy
e62
e65
h59
author_facet Furth Salim
author_sort Furth Salim
title Does Census Hiring Stimulate Jobs Growth?
title_short Does Census Hiring Stimulate Jobs Growth?
title_full Does Census Hiring Stimulate Jobs Growth?
title_fullStr Does Census Hiring Stimulate Jobs Growth?
title_full_unstemmed Does Census Hiring Stimulate Jobs Growth?
title_sort does census hiring stimulate jobs growth?
publisher Sciendo
series IZA Journal of Labor Policy
issn 2193-9004
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Governments perform national, labor-intensive censuses on a regular schedule. Censuses represent many of the largest peacetime expansions and contractions in federal hiring. The predetermined occurrence and scale of the census offers an economic experiment in the effects of temporary government hiring. This paper describes the construction of a data series on census hiring in the United States since 1950 and also collects available data on census employment in England and Wales, Canada, Korea, and Japan. Regressing total employment changes on census hiring yields coefficients extremely close to 1, indicating that there is no spillover from census hiring to the rest of the economy. Using census hiring and occurrence as instruments for government hiring in the US, Canada, and Korea, I estimate the effect of federal hiring on overall employment. Different samples yield varying jobs multipliers, with point estimates varying from -0.01 to 1.48. Including Korean and Canadian data yields lower multipliers, while including pre-1990 US data yields higher multipliers. In no specification can I reject the hypothesis that the job multiplier equals 1. In all specifications, standard errors are large enough that I can reject neither Keynesian nor crowd-out effects.
topic census
government employment
fiscal policy
e62
e65
h59
url https://doi.org/10.2478/izajolp-2020-0005
work_keys_str_mv AT furthsalim doescensushiringstimulatejobsgrowth
_version_ 1717781312313491456