Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy

Endocrine and metabolic disorders are a common condition in Europe and worldwide, and, among these, thyroid dysfunction still remains a problem. The measurement of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels represents the first-line assay for the assessment of thyroid function. In the present study, w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alfredo Di Cerbo, Nazario Quagliano, Antonella Napolitano, Federica Pezzuto, Tommaso Iannitti, Alessandro Di Cerbo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/9/1590
id doaj-e9525116c5d048a79c8d4d95ded3fcfb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9525116c5d048a79c8d4d95ded3fcfb2021-09-25T23:59:01ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182021-08-01111590159010.3390/diagnostics11091590Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern ItalyAlfredo Di Cerbo0Nazario Quagliano1Antonella Napolitano2Federica Pezzuto3Tommaso Iannitti4Alessandro Di Cerbo5Leonardo da Vinci Private Clinic, Via Nicola De Dominicis, 71121 Foggia, ItalyBiometron Laboratory, Viale Aldo Moro, 122/128, 71011 Apricena, ItalyBiometron Laboratory, Viale Aldo Moro, 122/128, 71011 Apricena, ItalyLeonardo da Vinci Private Clinic, Via Nicola De Dominicis, 71121 Foggia, ItalyIndependent Researcher, Southampton SO16 0BS, UKSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Via Circonvallazione 93/95, 62024 Matelica, ItalyEndocrine and metabolic disorders are a common condition in Europe and worldwide, and, among these, thyroid dysfunction still remains a problem. The measurement of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels represents the first-line assay for the assessment of thyroid function. In the present study, we compared serum concentrations of TSH, measured using a commercially available point-of-care test (POCT) method (FastPack<sup>®</sup> IP) and an established “conventional” laboratory-based method (Beckmann Access 2) in a cohort of patients from Foggia in Southern Italy. A strong correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.994) was found between both methods and was also confirmed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (0.82). The within-run coefficient of variation (CV) using FastPack<sup>®</sup> ranged from 4.03% and 8.57% at the TSH concentrations of 39.49 and 0.70 mIU/L, respectively. The between-run CV was 10.34% and 6.33% at the TSH concentrations of 0.87 and 26.55 mIU/L, respectively. The ratios of within- to between-assay CV were 0.83 and 1.06 at the TSH levels of 0.70 and 52.59 mIU/mL, respectively. In this study, we showed that serum TSH levels can be measured in a few minutes and at low-cost in terms of materials and equipment required. We observed that this approach is user-friendly, accurate, reproducible, and suitable for use in the clinic, while also meeting the criteria for effectiveness, impact, efficiency, and sustainability.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/9/1590endocrine and metabolic disordersthyroid stimulating hormonepoint-of-care test
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alfredo Di Cerbo
Nazario Quagliano
Antonella Napolitano
Federica Pezzuto
Tommaso Iannitti
Alessandro Di Cerbo
spellingShingle Alfredo Di Cerbo
Nazario Quagliano
Antonella Napolitano
Federica Pezzuto
Tommaso Iannitti
Alessandro Di Cerbo
Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy
Diagnostics
endocrine and metabolic disorders
thyroid stimulating hormone
point-of-care test
author_facet Alfredo Di Cerbo
Nazario Quagliano
Antonella Napolitano
Federica Pezzuto
Tommaso Iannitti
Alessandro Di Cerbo
author_sort Alfredo Di Cerbo
title Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy
title_short Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy
title_full Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy
title_fullStr Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between an Emerging Point-of-Care Tool for TSH Evaluation and a Centralized Laboratory-Based Method in a Cohort of Patients from Southern Italy
title_sort comparison between an emerging point-of-care tool for tsh evaluation and a centralized laboratory-based method in a cohort of patients from southern italy
publisher MDPI AG
series Diagnostics
issn 2075-4418
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Endocrine and metabolic disorders are a common condition in Europe and worldwide, and, among these, thyroid dysfunction still remains a problem. The measurement of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels represents the first-line assay for the assessment of thyroid function. In the present study, we compared serum concentrations of TSH, measured using a commercially available point-of-care test (POCT) method (FastPack<sup>®</sup> IP) and an established “conventional” laboratory-based method (Beckmann Access 2) in a cohort of patients from Foggia in Southern Italy. A strong correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.994) was found between both methods and was also confirmed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (0.82). The within-run coefficient of variation (CV) using FastPack<sup>®</sup> ranged from 4.03% and 8.57% at the TSH concentrations of 39.49 and 0.70 mIU/L, respectively. The between-run CV was 10.34% and 6.33% at the TSH concentrations of 0.87 and 26.55 mIU/L, respectively. The ratios of within- to between-assay CV were 0.83 and 1.06 at the TSH levels of 0.70 and 52.59 mIU/mL, respectively. In this study, we showed that serum TSH levels can be measured in a few minutes and at low-cost in terms of materials and equipment required. We observed that this approach is user-friendly, accurate, reproducible, and suitable for use in the clinic, while also meeting the criteria for effectiveness, impact, efficiency, and sustainability.
topic endocrine and metabolic disorders
thyroid stimulating hormone
point-of-care test
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/9/1590
work_keys_str_mv AT alfredodicerbo comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly
AT nazarioquagliano comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly
AT antonellanapolitano comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly
AT federicapezzuto comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly
AT tommasoiannitti comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly
AT alessandrodicerbo comparisonbetweenanemergingpointofcaretoolfortshevaluationandacentralizedlaboratorybasedmethodinacohortofpatientsfromsouthernitaly
_version_ 1717367427437690880