Professional Archetype Change: The Effects of Restricted Professional Autonomy

One of the points on which researchers agree is the centrality of autonomy to professionalism. Moreover, a common conclusion in the studies of professions is that the profound changes in society over the last fifty years have threatened the autonomy and changed the archetype of professionalism. Thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elin Funck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences 2012-12-01
Series:Professions and Professionalism
Online Access:https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/pp/article/view/334
id doaj-e9b3a42fcc8b4f969576e058f202f0f3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9b3a42fcc8b4f969576e058f202f0f32020-11-24T22:15:51ZengOslo and Akershus University College of Applied SciencesProfessions and Professionalism1893-10492012-12-012210.7577/pp.334328Professional Archetype Change: The Effects of Restricted Professional AutonomyElin Funck0School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University One of the points on which researchers agree is the centrality of autonomy to professionalism. Moreover, a common conclusion in the studies of professions is that the profound changes in society over the last fifty years have threatened the autonomy and changed the archetype of professionalism. This paper contributes to the research on changes and continuities, challenges and opportunities for professionalism by discussing advantages and disadvantages of restricted professional autonomy. By describing the historical development in the Swedish and Canadian healthcare context, two major findings are discussed. First, although medical professionals have been subjected to certain constraints, they still appear to maintain a relatively high level of autonomy concerning the technical content of the work. Second, restricting professional autonomy is not negative merely due to the preservation of the professional archetype; rather, a «reasonable» limitation can be positive if professional autonomy is understood as a contract based on public trust. https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/pp/article/view/334
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elin Funck
spellingShingle Elin Funck
Professional Archetype Change: The Effects of Restricted Professional Autonomy
Professions and Professionalism
author_facet Elin Funck
author_sort Elin Funck
title Professional Archetype Change: The Effects of Restricted Professional Autonomy
title_short Professional Archetype Change: The Effects of Restricted Professional Autonomy
title_full Professional Archetype Change: The Effects of Restricted Professional Autonomy
title_fullStr Professional Archetype Change: The Effects of Restricted Professional Autonomy
title_full_unstemmed Professional Archetype Change: The Effects of Restricted Professional Autonomy
title_sort professional archetype change: the effects of restricted professional autonomy
publisher Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences
series Professions and Professionalism
issn 1893-1049
publishDate 2012-12-01
description One of the points on which researchers agree is the centrality of autonomy to professionalism. Moreover, a common conclusion in the studies of professions is that the profound changes in society over the last fifty years have threatened the autonomy and changed the archetype of professionalism. This paper contributes to the research on changes and continuities, challenges and opportunities for professionalism by discussing advantages and disadvantages of restricted professional autonomy. By describing the historical development in the Swedish and Canadian healthcare context, two major findings are discussed. First, although medical professionals have been subjected to certain constraints, they still appear to maintain a relatively high level of autonomy concerning the technical content of the work. Second, restricting professional autonomy is not negative merely due to the preservation of the professional archetype; rather, a «reasonable» limitation can be positive if professional autonomy is understood as a contract based on public trust.
url https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/pp/article/view/334
work_keys_str_mv AT elinfunck professionalarchetypechangetheeffectsofrestrictedprofessionalautonomy
_version_ 1725792677522309120