RFCAG2013: Russian-Finnish comparison of absolute gravimeters in 2013
In June–July 2013,we performed a comparison of five absolute gravimeters of different types. The gravimeters were the FG5X-221 of the FGI, the FG5-110 and GBL-M 002 of the TsNIIGaiK, the GABL-PM of the IAE SB RAS, and the GABL-M of the NIIMorGeofizika (Murmansk, Russia). The three last-mentioned are...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2016-11-01
|
Series: | Journal of Geodetic Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jogs.2016.6.issue-1/jogs-2016-0008/jogs-2016-0008.xml?format=INT |
id |
doaj-e9f905123b0b420e80f5aa48e73d99df |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e9f905123b0b420e80f5aa48e73d99df2020-11-25T01:58:21ZengSciendoJournal of Geodetic Science2081-99432016-11-016110.1515/jogs-2016-0008jogs-2016-0008RFCAG2013: Russian-Finnish comparison of absolute gravimeters in 2013Mäkinen J.0Sermyagin R.A.1Oshchepkov I.A.2Basmanov A.V.3Pozdnyakov A.V.4Yushkin V.D.5Stus Yu.F.6Nosov D.A.7Finnish Geospatial Research Institute, National Land Survey, FinlandFederal Scientific Research Center of Geodesy, Cartography and SDI (TsNIIGAiK), RussiaFederal Scientific Research Center of Geodesy, Cartography and SDI (TsNIIGAiK), RussiaFederal Scientific Research Center of Geodesy, Cartography and SDI (TsNIIGAiK), RussiaFederal Scientific Research Center of Geodesy, Cartography and SDI (TsNIIGAiK), RussiaLomonosov Moscow State University, Sternberg Astronomical Institute (SAI MSU), RussiaSiberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation and Electrometry (IAE SB RAS), RussiaSiberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation and Electrometry (IAE SB RAS), RussiaIn June–July 2013,we performed a comparison of five absolute gravimeters of different types. The gravimeters were the FG5X-221 of the FGI, the FG5-110 and GBL-M 002 of the TsNIIGaiK, the GABL-PM of the IAE SB RAS, and the GABL-M of the NIIMorGeofizika (Murmansk, Russia). The three last-mentioned are field-type portable gravimeters made by the Institute of Automation and Electrometry in Novosibirsk, and this is the first international comparison for them. This Russian-Finnish Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters RFCAG2013 was conducted at four sites with different characteristics: at the field sites Pulkovo and Svetloe near St. Petersburg, and at the laboratory sites TsNIIGaIK in Moscow and Zvenigorod near Moscow. At the TsNIIGAiK site and at Zvenigorod two piers were used, such that altogether six stations were occupied. The FG5X- 221 provides the link to the CCM.G-K2 Key Comparison in Luxembourg in November 2013. Recently, the Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities and the International Association of Geodesy drafted a strategy on how to best transmit the results of Key Comparisons of absolute gravimeters to benefit the geodetic and geophysical gravimetric community. Our treatment of the RFCAG2013 presents one of the first practical applications of the ideas of the strategy document, andwe discuss the resulting uncertainty structure. Regarding the comparison results, we find the gravimeters show consistent offsets at the quite different sites. All except one gravimeter are in equivalence.http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jogs.2016.6.issue-1/jogs-2016-0008/jogs-2016-0008.xml?format=INTabsolute gravimeter field absolute gravimeter gravimeter comparison key comparison |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mäkinen J. Sermyagin R.A. Oshchepkov I.A. Basmanov A.V. Pozdnyakov A.V. Yushkin V.D. Stus Yu.F. Nosov D.A. |
spellingShingle |
Mäkinen J. Sermyagin R.A. Oshchepkov I.A. Basmanov A.V. Pozdnyakov A.V. Yushkin V.D. Stus Yu.F. Nosov D.A. RFCAG2013: Russian-Finnish comparison of absolute gravimeters in 2013 Journal of Geodetic Science absolute gravimeter field absolute gravimeter gravimeter comparison key comparison |
author_facet |
Mäkinen J. Sermyagin R.A. Oshchepkov I.A. Basmanov A.V. Pozdnyakov A.V. Yushkin V.D. Stus Yu.F. Nosov D.A. |
author_sort |
Mäkinen J. |
title |
RFCAG2013: Russian-Finnish comparison of
absolute gravimeters in 2013 |
title_short |
RFCAG2013: Russian-Finnish comparison of
absolute gravimeters in 2013 |
title_full |
RFCAG2013: Russian-Finnish comparison of
absolute gravimeters in 2013 |
title_fullStr |
RFCAG2013: Russian-Finnish comparison of
absolute gravimeters in 2013 |
title_full_unstemmed |
RFCAG2013: Russian-Finnish comparison of
absolute gravimeters in 2013 |
title_sort |
rfcag2013: russian-finnish comparison of
absolute gravimeters in 2013 |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Journal of Geodetic Science |
issn |
2081-9943 |
publishDate |
2016-11-01 |
description |
In June–July 2013,we performed a comparison of
five absolute gravimeters of different types. The gravimeters
were the FG5X-221 of the FGI, the FG5-110 and GBL-M
002 of the TsNIIGaiK, the GABL-PM of the IAE SB RAS, and
the GABL-M of the NIIMorGeofizika (Murmansk, Russia).
The three last-mentioned are field-type portable gravimeters
made by the Institute of Automation and Electrometry
in Novosibirsk, and this is the first international comparison
for them. This Russian-Finnish Comparison of Absolute
Gravimeters RFCAG2013 was conducted at four sites
with different characteristics: at the field sites Pulkovo and
Svetloe near St. Petersburg, and at the laboratory sites
TsNIIGaIK in Moscow and Zvenigorod near Moscow. At
the TsNIIGAiK site and at Zvenigorod two piers were used,
such that altogether six stations were occupied. The FG5X-
221 provides the link to the CCM.G-K2 Key Comparison in
Luxembourg in November 2013. Recently, the Consultative
Committee for Mass and Related Quantities and the International
Association of Geodesy drafted a strategy on how
to best transmit the results of Key Comparisons of absolute
gravimeters to benefit the geodetic and geophysical
gravimetric community. Our treatment of the RFCAG2013
presents one of the first practical applications of the ideas
of the strategy document, andwe discuss the resulting uncertainty
structure. Regarding the comparison results, we
find the gravimeters show consistent offsets at the quite
different sites. All except one gravimeter are in equivalence. |
topic |
absolute gravimeter field absolute gravimeter gravimeter comparison key comparison |
url |
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jogs.2016.6.issue-1/jogs-2016-0008/jogs-2016-0008.xml?format=INT |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT makinenj rfcag2013russianfinnishcomparisonofabsolutegravimetersin2013 AT sermyaginra rfcag2013russianfinnishcomparisonofabsolutegravimetersin2013 AT oshchepkovia rfcag2013russianfinnishcomparisonofabsolutegravimetersin2013 AT basmanovav rfcag2013russianfinnishcomparisonofabsolutegravimetersin2013 AT pozdnyakovav rfcag2013russianfinnishcomparisonofabsolutegravimetersin2013 AT yushkinvd rfcag2013russianfinnishcomparisonofabsolutegravimetersin2013 AT stusyuf rfcag2013russianfinnishcomparisonofabsolutegravimetersin2013 AT nosovda rfcag2013russianfinnishcomparisonofabsolutegravimetersin2013 |
_version_ |
1724970173942726656 |