Innovative cost-effective method to repair lacrimal cannaliculi laceration – finding proximal end and stent

Purpose: To explore a new technique to find out the proximal end of lacerated canaliculi and a new material for the stent.Methods: Surgery was performed on 9 eyes of 9 patients using a 5/0 prolene suture needle as a modified probe. Prolene suture was inserted as a stent and left in place for two mon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shah, Shreya M., Shah, Mehul A., Patel, Kashyap B., Singh, Romi U.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2019-05-01
Series:GMS Ophthalmology Cases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/oc/2019-9/oc000109.shtml
id doaj-ea0a97b8dcb54237b051786c206c7b49
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea0a97b8dcb54237b051786c206c7b492020-11-25T04:03:23ZengGerman Medical Science GMS Publishing HouseGMS Ophthalmology Cases2193-14962019-05-019Doc2010.3205/oc000109Innovative cost-effective method to repair lacrimal cannaliculi laceration – finding proximal end and stentShah, Shreya M.0Shah, Mehul A.1Patel, Kashyap B.2Singh, Romi U.3Drashti Netralaya, Dahod, Gujarat, IndiaDrashti Netralaya, Dahod, Gujarat, IndiaDrashti Netralaya, Dahod, Gujarat, IndiaDrashti Netralaya, Dahod, Gujarat, IndiaPurpose: To explore a new technique to find out the proximal end of lacerated canaliculi and a new material for the stent.Methods: Surgery was performed on 9 eyes of 9 patients using a 5/0 prolene suture needle as a modified probe. Prolene suture was inserted as a stent and left in place for two months. All the data were analyzed.Results: The surgery was successful in all cases and the prolene were removed after two months. The mean follow-up time after the tube removal was 3.8 months (range 3–6 months). No other complications associated with the prolene sutures were noticed except for epiphora and corneal irritation in three cases. All the tubes were removed successfully without any difficulty. No iatrogenic injuries occurred during prolene removal.Conclusions: The reported surgical technique is a very cost-effective option for lacrimal canalicular laceration repair.http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/oc/2019-9/oc000109.shtmllacrimal canalicular lacerationprolene suturestentidentification of proximal end
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shah, Shreya M.
Shah, Mehul A.
Patel, Kashyap B.
Singh, Romi U.
spellingShingle Shah, Shreya M.
Shah, Mehul A.
Patel, Kashyap B.
Singh, Romi U.
Innovative cost-effective method to repair lacrimal cannaliculi laceration – finding proximal end and stent
GMS Ophthalmology Cases
lacrimal canalicular laceration
prolene suture
stent
identification of proximal end
author_facet Shah, Shreya M.
Shah, Mehul A.
Patel, Kashyap B.
Singh, Romi U.
author_sort Shah, Shreya M.
title Innovative cost-effective method to repair lacrimal cannaliculi laceration – finding proximal end and stent
title_short Innovative cost-effective method to repair lacrimal cannaliculi laceration – finding proximal end and stent
title_full Innovative cost-effective method to repair lacrimal cannaliculi laceration – finding proximal end and stent
title_fullStr Innovative cost-effective method to repair lacrimal cannaliculi laceration – finding proximal end and stent
title_full_unstemmed Innovative cost-effective method to repair lacrimal cannaliculi laceration – finding proximal end and stent
title_sort innovative cost-effective method to repair lacrimal cannaliculi laceration – finding proximal end and stent
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
series GMS Ophthalmology Cases
issn 2193-1496
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Purpose: To explore a new technique to find out the proximal end of lacerated canaliculi and a new material for the stent.Methods: Surgery was performed on 9 eyes of 9 patients using a 5/0 prolene suture needle as a modified probe. Prolene suture was inserted as a stent and left in place for two months. All the data were analyzed.Results: The surgery was successful in all cases and the prolene were removed after two months. The mean follow-up time after the tube removal was 3.8 months (range 3–6 months). No other complications associated with the prolene sutures were noticed except for epiphora and corneal irritation in three cases. All the tubes were removed successfully without any difficulty. No iatrogenic injuries occurred during prolene removal.Conclusions: The reported surgical technique is a very cost-effective option for lacrimal canalicular laceration repair.
topic lacrimal canalicular laceration
prolene suture
stent
identification of proximal end
url http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/oc/2019-9/oc000109.shtml
work_keys_str_mv AT shahshreyam innovativecosteffectivemethodtorepairlacrimalcannaliculilacerationfindingproximalendandstent
AT shahmehula innovativecosteffectivemethodtorepairlacrimalcannaliculilacerationfindingproximalendandstent
AT patelkashyapb innovativecosteffectivemethodtorepairlacrimalcannaliculilacerationfindingproximalendandstent
AT singhromiu innovativecosteffectivemethodtorepairlacrimalcannaliculilacerationfindingproximalendandstent
_version_ 1724440390817284096