Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy Models

<span>The usage of indicators as constituent parts of composite indices is an extended practice in many fields of knowledge. Even if rigorous statistical analyses are implemented, many of the methodologies follow simple arithmetic assumptions to aggregate indicators to build an index. One of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Rubén G. Cárdenas, Àngela Nebot, Francisco Mugica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/9/3017
id doaj-ea295bb8b99a40efa15c0b3c1ffcf008
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ea295bb8b99a40efa15c0b3c1ffcf0082020-11-25T02:48:52ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-04-01103017301710.3390/app10093017Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy ModelsJ. Rubén G. Cárdenas0Àngela Nebot1Francisco Mugica2Understanding and Managing Extremes (UME) school, IUSS Pavia, Piazza della Vittoria n.15, 27100 Pavia, ItalySoft Computing research group at Intelligent Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Research Center, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, Jordi Girona Salgado 1-3, 08034 Barcelona, SpainSoft Computing research group at Intelligent Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Research Center, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, Jordi Girona Salgado 1-3, 08034 Barcelona, Spain<span>The usage of indicators as constituent parts of composite indices is an extended practice in many fields of knowledge. Even if rigorous statistical analyses are implemented, many of the methodologies follow simple arithmetic assumptions to aggregate indicators to build an index. One of the consequences of such assumptions can be the concealment of the influence of some of the composite index’s components. We developed a fuzzy method that aggregates indicators using non-linear methods and, in this paper, compare it to a well-known example in the field of risk assessment, called Moncho’s equation, which combines physical and social components and uses a linear aggregation method to estimate a level of seismic risk. By comparing the spatial pattern of the risk level obtained from these two methodologies, we were able to evaluate to what extent a fuzzy approach allows a more realistic representation of how social vulnerability levels might shape the seismic risk panorama in an urban environment. We found that, in some cases, this approach can lead to risk level values that are up to 80% greater than those obtained using a linear aggregation method for the same areas.</span>https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/9/3017composite indicesfuzzy systemsfuzzy modelsindicator aggregationrisk assessmentseismic vulnerability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Rubén G. Cárdenas
Àngela Nebot
Francisco Mugica
spellingShingle J. Rubén G. Cárdenas
Àngela Nebot
Francisco Mugica
Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy Models
Applied Sciences
composite indices
fuzzy systems
fuzzy models
indicator aggregation
risk assessment
seismic vulnerability
author_facet J. Rubén G. Cárdenas
Àngela Nebot
Francisco Mugica
author_sort J. Rubén G. Cárdenas
title Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy Models
title_short Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy Models
title_full Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy Models
title_fullStr Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy Models
title_full_unstemmed Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy Models
title_sort integral seismic risk assessment through fuzzy models
publisher MDPI AG
series Applied Sciences
issn 2076-3417
publishDate 2020-04-01
description <span>The usage of indicators as constituent parts of composite indices is an extended practice in many fields of knowledge. Even if rigorous statistical analyses are implemented, many of the methodologies follow simple arithmetic assumptions to aggregate indicators to build an index. One of the consequences of such assumptions can be the concealment of the influence of some of the composite index’s components. We developed a fuzzy method that aggregates indicators using non-linear methods and, in this paper, compare it to a well-known example in the field of risk assessment, called Moncho’s equation, which combines physical and social components and uses a linear aggregation method to estimate a level of seismic risk. By comparing the spatial pattern of the risk level obtained from these two methodologies, we were able to evaluate to what extent a fuzzy approach allows a more realistic representation of how social vulnerability levels might shape the seismic risk panorama in an urban environment. We found that, in some cases, this approach can lead to risk level values that are up to 80% greater than those obtained using a linear aggregation method for the same areas.</span>
topic composite indices
fuzzy systems
fuzzy models
indicator aggregation
risk assessment
seismic vulnerability
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/9/3017
work_keys_str_mv AT jrubengcardenas integralseismicriskassessmentthroughfuzzymodels
AT angelanebot integralseismicriskassessmentthroughfuzzymodels
AT franciscomugica integralseismicriskassessmentthroughfuzzymodels
_version_ 1724746101219655680