Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy Models
<span>The usage of indicators as constituent parts of composite indices is an extended practice in many fields of knowledge. Even if rigorous statistical analyses are implemented, many of the methodologies follow simple arithmetic assumptions to aggregate indicators to build an index. One of t...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/9/3017 |
id |
doaj-ea295bb8b99a40efa15c0b3c1ffcf008 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ea295bb8b99a40efa15c0b3c1ffcf0082020-11-25T02:48:52ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-04-01103017301710.3390/app10093017Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy ModelsJ. Rubén G. Cárdenas0Àngela Nebot1Francisco Mugica2Understanding and Managing Extremes (UME) school, IUSS Pavia, Piazza della Vittoria n.15, 27100 Pavia, ItalySoft Computing research group at Intelligent Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Research Center, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, Jordi Girona Salgado 1-3, 08034 Barcelona, SpainSoft Computing research group at Intelligent Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Research Center, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, Jordi Girona Salgado 1-3, 08034 Barcelona, Spain<span>The usage of indicators as constituent parts of composite indices is an extended practice in many fields of knowledge. Even if rigorous statistical analyses are implemented, many of the methodologies follow simple arithmetic assumptions to aggregate indicators to build an index. One of the consequences of such assumptions can be the concealment of the influence of some of the composite index’s components. We developed a fuzzy method that aggregates indicators using non-linear methods and, in this paper, compare it to a well-known example in the field of risk assessment, called Moncho’s equation, which combines physical and social components and uses a linear aggregation method to estimate a level of seismic risk. By comparing the spatial pattern of the risk level obtained from these two methodologies, we were able to evaluate to what extent a fuzzy approach allows a more realistic representation of how social vulnerability levels might shape the seismic risk panorama in an urban environment. We found that, in some cases, this approach can lead to risk level values that are up to 80% greater than those obtained using a linear aggregation method for the same areas.</span>https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/9/3017composite indicesfuzzy systemsfuzzy modelsindicator aggregationrisk assessmentseismic vulnerability |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
J. Rubén G. Cárdenas Àngela Nebot Francisco Mugica |
spellingShingle |
J. Rubén G. Cárdenas Àngela Nebot Francisco Mugica Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy Models Applied Sciences composite indices fuzzy systems fuzzy models indicator aggregation risk assessment seismic vulnerability |
author_facet |
J. Rubén G. Cárdenas Àngela Nebot Francisco Mugica |
author_sort |
J. Rubén G. Cárdenas |
title |
Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy Models |
title_short |
Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy Models |
title_full |
Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy Models |
title_fullStr |
Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy Models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Integral Seismic Risk Assessment through Fuzzy Models |
title_sort |
integral seismic risk assessment through fuzzy models |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Applied Sciences |
issn |
2076-3417 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
<span>The usage of indicators as constituent parts of composite indices is an extended practice in many fields of knowledge. Even if rigorous statistical analyses are implemented, many of the methodologies follow simple arithmetic assumptions to aggregate indicators to build an index. One of the consequences of such assumptions can be the concealment of the influence of some of the composite index’s components. We developed a fuzzy method that aggregates indicators using non-linear methods and, in this paper, compare it to a well-known example in the field of risk assessment, called Moncho’s equation, which combines physical and social components and uses a linear aggregation method to estimate a level of seismic risk. By comparing the spatial pattern of the risk level obtained from these two methodologies, we were able to evaluate to what extent a fuzzy approach allows a more realistic representation of how social vulnerability levels might shape the seismic risk panorama in an urban environment. We found that, in some cases, this approach can lead to risk level values that are up to 80% greater than those obtained using a linear aggregation method for the same areas.</span> |
topic |
composite indices fuzzy systems fuzzy models indicator aggregation risk assessment seismic vulnerability |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/9/3017 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jrubengcardenas integralseismicriskassessmentthroughfuzzymodels AT angelanebot integralseismicriskassessmentthroughfuzzymodels AT franciscomugica integralseismicriskassessmentthroughfuzzymodels |
_version_ |
1724746101219655680 |