Treatment in the pediatric emergency department is evidence based: a retrospective analysis
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Our goal was to quantify the evidence that is available to the physicians of a pediatric emergency department (PED) in making treatment decisions. Further, we wished to ascertain what percentage of evidence for treatment provided in...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2006-10-01
|
Series: | BMC Pediatrics |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/6/26 |
id |
doaj-ea7ebcaa879a41ffb358b5cce52e9580 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ea7ebcaa879a41ffb358b5cce52e95802020-11-24T21:55:12ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312006-10-01612610.1186/1471-2431-6-26Treatment in the pediatric emergency department is evidence based: a retrospective analysisHartling LisaCramer KristieWiebe NatashaWaters Kellie LKlassen Terry P<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Our goal was to quantify the evidence that is available to the physicians of a pediatric emergency department (PED) in making treatment decisions. Further, we wished to ascertain what percentage of evidence for treatment provided in the PED comes from pediatric studies.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted a retrospective chart review of randomly selected patients seen in the PED between January 1 and December 31, 2002. The principal investigator identified a primary diagnosis and primary intervention for each chart. A thorough literature search was then undertaken with respect to the primary intervention. If a randomized control trial (RCT) or a systematic review was found, the intervention was classified as level I evidence. If no RCT was found, the intervention was assessed by an expert committee who determined its appropriateness based on face validity (RCTs were unanimously judged to be both unnecessary and, if a placebo would have been involved, unethical). These interventions were classified as level II evidence. Interventions that did not fall into either above category were classified as level III evidence.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Two hundred and sixty-two patient charts were reviewed. Of these, 35.9% did not receive a primary intervention. Of the 168 interventions assessed, 80.4% were evidence-based (level I), 7.1% had face validity (level II) and 12.5% had no supporting evidence (level III). Of the evidence-based interventions, 83.7% were supported by studies with mostly pediatric patients.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our study demonstrates that a substantial proportion of PED treatment decisions are evidence-based, with most based on studies in pediatric patients. Also, a large number of patients seen in the PED receive no intervention.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/6/26 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hartling Lisa Cramer Kristie Wiebe Natasha Waters Kellie L Klassen Terry P |
spellingShingle |
Hartling Lisa Cramer Kristie Wiebe Natasha Waters Kellie L Klassen Terry P Treatment in the pediatric emergency department is evidence based: a retrospective analysis BMC Pediatrics |
author_facet |
Hartling Lisa Cramer Kristie Wiebe Natasha Waters Kellie L Klassen Terry P |
author_sort |
Hartling Lisa |
title |
Treatment in the pediatric emergency department is evidence based: a retrospective analysis |
title_short |
Treatment in the pediatric emergency department is evidence based: a retrospective analysis |
title_full |
Treatment in the pediatric emergency department is evidence based: a retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr |
Treatment in the pediatric emergency department is evidence based: a retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Treatment in the pediatric emergency department is evidence based: a retrospective analysis |
title_sort |
treatment in the pediatric emergency department is evidence based: a retrospective analysis |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Pediatrics |
issn |
1471-2431 |
publishDate |
2006-10-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Our goal was to quantify the evidence that is available to the physicians of a pediatric emergency department (PED) in making treatment decisions. Further, we wished to ascertain what percentage of evidence for treatment provided in the PED comes from pediatric studies.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted a retrospective chart review of randomly selected patients seen in the PED between January 1 and December 31, 2002. The principal investigator identified a primary diagnosis and primary intervention for each chart. A thorough literature search was then undertaken with respect to the primary intervention. If a randomized control trial (RCT) or a systematic review was found, the intervention was classified as level I evidence. If no RCT was found, the intervention was assessed by an expert committee who determined its appropriateness based on face validity (RCTs were unanimously judged to be both unnecessary and, if a placebo would have been involved, unethical). These interventions were classified as level II evidence. Interventions that did not fall into either above category were classified as level III evidence.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Two hundred and sixty-two patient charts were reviewed. Of these, 35.9% did not receive a primary intervention. Of the 168 interventions assessed, 80.4% were evidence-based (level I), 7.1% had face validity (level II) and 12.5% had no supporting evidence (level III). Of the evidence-based interventions, 83.7% were supported by studies with mostly pediatric patients.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our study demonstrates that a substantial proportion of PED treatment decisions are evidence-based, with most based on studies in pediatric patients. Also, a large number of patients seen in the PED receive no intervention.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/6/26 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hartlinglisa treatmentinthepediatricemergencydepartmentisevidencebasedaretrospectiveanalysis AT cramerkristie treatmentinthepediatricemergencydepartmentisevidencebasedaretrospectiveanalysis AT wiebenatasha treatmentinthepediatricemergencydepartmentisevidencebasedaretrospectiveanalysis AT waterskelliel treatmentinthepediatricemergencydepartmentisevidencebasedaretrospectiveanalysis AT klassenterryp treatmentinthepediatricemergencydepartmentisevidencebasedaretrospectiveanalysis |
_version_ |
1725864038476283904 |