Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide theraphies for diffuse diabetic macular edema

<b>AIM:</b>To compare therapeutic effects of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) versus intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections for bilateral diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME).<b>METHODS:</b> Forty eyes of 20 patients with bilateral DDME participated in this stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sibel Aksoy, Gursel Yilmaz, Imren Akkoyun, Ayse Canan Yazici
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2015-06-01
Series:International Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2015/3/20150320.pdf
id doaj-eac731c788cb422f94c82da6a7908593
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eac731c788cb422f94c82da6a79085932020-11-24T23:32:18ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)International Journal of Ophthalmology2222-39592227-48982015-06-018355055510.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.03.20Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide theraphies for diffuse diabetic macular edemaSibel Aksoy0Gursel Yilmaz1Imren Akkoyun2Ayse Canan Yazici3Department of Ophthalmology, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34452, Turkey<br>Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara 06490, Turkey<br>Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara 06490, Turkey<br>Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Ankara 06490, Turkey<b>AIM:</b>To compare therapeutic effects of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) versus intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections for bilateral diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME).<b>METHODS:</b> Forty eyes of 20 patients with bilateral DDME participated in this study. For each patient, 4 mg/0.1 mL IVTA was injected to one eye and 2.5 mg/0.1 mL IVB was injected to the other eye. The effects of injection for diabetic macular edema (DME) were evaluated using best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) by applanation tonometer. Patients underwent eye examinations, including BCVA, CMT, and IOP at pre-injection, 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24wk after injection. During the follow-up, second injections were performed to eyes which have CMT greater than 400 µm at 12wk for salvage therapy.<b>RESULTS:</b> BCVA (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) at pre-injection, 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24wk after injection was 0.71±0.19, 0.62±0.23, 0.63±0.12, 0.63±0.13, 0.63±0.14 and 0.61±0.24 in the IVTA group and 0.68±0.25, 0.61±0.22, 0.60±0.24, 0.62±0.25, 0.65±0.26 and 0.59±0.25 in the IVB group, respectively. CMT (μm) at pre-injection, 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24wk after injection was 544±125, 383±96, 335±87, 323±87, 333±92, 335±61 in the IVTA group and 514±100, 431±86, 428±107, 442±106, 478±112, 430±88 in the IVB group respectively. Reduction ratios of mean CMT were 29% at 1wk, 38% at 4wk, 40% at 8wk, 38% at 12wk, and 38% at 24wk in the IVTA group. Second IVTA injections were performed to the 6 eyes (30%) at 12wk. Reduction ratios of mean CMT were 16% at 1wk, 17% at 4wk, 14% at 8wk, 7% at 12wk, and 16% at 24wk in the IVB group. Second IVB injections were performed to the 15 eyes (75%) at 12wk.<b>CONCLUSION:</b>This study showed earlier and more frequent macular edema recurrences in the eyes treated with bevacizumab compared with the ones treated with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide was found to provide more efficient and long-standing effect in terms of reducing CMT compared with the bevacizumab.http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2015/3/20150320.pdfbevacizumabdiabetic macular edematriamcinolone acetonide
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sibel Aksoy
Gursel Yilmaz
Imren Akkoyun
Ayse Canan Yazici
spellingShingle Sibel Aksoy
Gursel Yilmaz
Imren Akkoyun
Ayse Canan Yazici
Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide theraphies for diffuse diabetic macular edema
International Journal of Ophthalmology
bevacizumab
diabetic macular edema
triamcinolone acetonide
author_facet Sibel Aksoy
Gursel Yilmaz
Imren Akkoyun
Ayse Canan Yazici
author_sort Sibel Aksoy
title Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide theraphies for diffuse diabetic macular edema
title_short Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide theraphies for diffuse diabetic macular edema
title_full Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide theraphies for diffuse diabetic macular edema
title_fullStr Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide theraphies for diffuse diabetic macular edema
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide theraphies for diffuse diabetic macular edema
title_sort comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide theraphies for diffuse diabetic macular edema
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
series International Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 2222-3959
2227-4898
publishDate 2015-06-01
description <b>AIM:</b>To compare therapeutic effects of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) versus intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections for bilateral diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME).<b>METHODS:</b> Forty eyes of 20 patients with bilateral DDME participated in this study. For each patient, 4 mg/0.1 mL IVTA was injected to one eye and 2.5 mg/0.1 mL IVB was injected to the other eye. The effects of injection for diabetic macular edema (DME) were evaluated using best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) by applanation tonometer. Patients underwent eye examinations, including BCVA, CMT, and IOP at pre-injection, 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24wk after injection. During the follow-up, second injections were performed to eyes which have CMT greater than 400 µm at 12wk for salvage therapy.<b>RESULTS:</b> BCVA (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) at pre-injection, 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24wk after injection was 0.71±0.19, 0.62±0.23, 0.63±0.12, 0.63±0.13, 0.63±0.14 and 0.61±0.24 in the IVTA group and 0.68±0.25, 0.61±0.22, 0.60±0.24, 0.62±0.25, 0.65±0.26 and 0.59±0.25 in the IVB group, respectively. CMT (μm) at pre-injection, 1, 4, 8, 12 and 24wk after injection was 544±125, 383±96, 335±87, 323±87, 333±92, 335±61 in the IVTA group and 514±100, 431±86, 428±107, 442±106, 478±112, 430±88 in the IVB group respectively. Reduction ratios of mean CMT were 29% at 1wk, 38% at 4wk, 40% at 8wk, 38% at 12wk, and 38% at 24wk in the IVTA group. Second IVTA injections were performed to the 6 eyes (30%) at 12wk. Reduction ratios of mean CMT were 16% at 1wk, 17% at 4wk, 14% at 8wk, 7% at 12wk, and 16% at 24wk in the IVB group. Second IVB injections were performed to the 15 eyes (75%) at 12wk.<b>CONCLUSION:</b>This study showed earlier and more frequent macular edema recurrences in the eyes treated with bevacizumab compared with the ones treated with triamcinolone acetonide. Triamcinolone acetonide was found to provide more efficient and long-standing effect in terms of reducing CMT compared with the bevacizumab.
topic bevacizumab
diabetic macular edema
triamcinolone acetonide
url http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2015/3/20150320.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sibelaksoy comparisonofintravitrealbevacizumabandtriamcinoloneacetonidetheraphiesfordiffusediabeticmacularedema
AT gurselyilmaz comparisonofintravitrealbevacizumabandtriamcinoloneacetonidetheraphiesfordiffusediabeticmacularedema
AT imrenakkoyun comparisonofintravitrealbevacizumabandtriamcinoloneacetonidetheraphiesfordiffusediabeticmacularedema
AT aysecananyazici comparisonofintravitrealbevacizumabandtriamcinoloneacetonidetheraphiesfordiffusediabeticmacularedema
_version_ 1725534699252613120