Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy

Abstract Background The phase 2 BRIGHT AML 1003 trial evaluated efficacy and safety of glasdegib + low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The multicenter, open-label study randomized patients to receive glasdegib + LDAC (n = 78) or L...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jorge E. Cortes, Florian H. Heidel, Walter Fiedler, B. Douglas Smith, Tadeusz Robak, Pau Montesinos, Anna Candoni, Brian Leber, Mikkael A. Sekeres, Daniel A. Pollyea, Roxanne Ferdinand, Weidong Wendy Ma, Thomas O’Brien, Ashleigh O’Connell, Geoffrey Chan, Michael Heuser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-07-01
Series:Journal of Hematology & Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13045-020-00929-8
id doaj-eb1cbed6f88d4b89add1a17240cfd403
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eb1cbed6f88d4b89add1a17240cfd4032020-11-25T03:33:35ZengBMCJournal of Hematology & Oncology1756-87222020-07-0113111210.1186/s13045-020-00929-8Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapyJorge E. Cortes0Florian H. Heidel1Walter Fiedler2B. Douglas Smith3Tadeusz Robak4Pau Montesinos5Anna Candoni6Brian Leber7Mikkael A. Sekeres8Daniel A. Pollyea9Roxanne Ferdinand10Weidong Wendy Ma11Thomas O’Brien12Ashleigh O’Connell13Geoffrey Chan14Michael Heuser15Georgia Cancer CenterOtto-von-Guericke University Medical Center MagdeburgDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg-EppendorfJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer CenterDepartment of Hematology, Medical University of Łódź and Copernicus Memorial HospitalHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; CIBERONC, Instituto Carlos IIIAzienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di UdineJuravinski Hospital at Hamilton Health SciencesLeukemia Program, Cleveland ClinicDivision of Hematology, University of Colorado School of MedicinePfizer OncologyPfizer OncologyPfizer OncologyPfizer OncologyPfizer OncologyDepartment of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical SchoolAbstract Background The phase 2 BRIGHT AML 1003 trial evaluated efficacy and safety of glasdegib + low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The multicenter, open-label study randomized patients to receive glasdegib + LDAC (n = 78) or LDAC alone (n = 38). The rate of complete remission (CR) was 19.2% in the glasdegib + LDAC arm versus 2.6% in the LDAC arm (P = 0.015). Methods This post hoc analysis determines whether the clinical benefits of glasdegib are restricted to patients who achieve CR, or if they extend to those who do not achieve CR. Results In patients who did not achieve CR, the addition of glasdegib to LDAC improved overall survival (OS) versus LDAC alone (hazard ratio = 0.63 [95% confidence interval, 0.41–0.98]; P = 0.0182; median OS, 5.0 vs 4.1 months). Additionally, more patients receiving glasdegib + LDAC achieved durable recovery of absolute neutrophil count (≥ 1000/μl, 45.6% vs 35.5%), hemoglobin (≥ 9 g/dl, 54.4% vs 38.7%), and platelets (≥ 100,000/μl, 29.8% vs 9.7%). Transfusion independence was achieved by 15.0% and 2.9% of patients receiving glasdegib + LDAC and LDAC alone, respectively. Conclusions Collectively, these data suggest that there are clinical benefits with glasdegib in the absence of CR. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01546038 (March 7, 2012)http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13045-020-00929-8GlasdegibAcute myeloid leukemiaClinical trialDisease responseEfficacy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jorge E. Cortes
Florian H. Heidel
Walter Fiedler
B. Douglas Smith
Tadeusz Robak
Pau Montesinos
Anna Candoni
Brian Leber
Mikkael A. Sekeres
Daniel A. Pollyea
Roxanne Ferdinand
Weidong Wendy Ma
Thomas O’Brien
Ashleigh O’Connell
Geoffrey Chan
Michael Heuser
spellingShingle Jorge E. Cortes
Florian H. Heidel
Walter Fiedler
B. Douglas Smith
Tadeusz Robak
Pau Montesinos
Anna Candoni
Brian Leber
Mikkael A. Sekeres
Daniel A. Pollyea
Roxanne Ferdinand
Weidong Wendy Ma
Thomas O’Brien
Ashleigh O’Connell
Geoffrey Chan
Michael Heuser
Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
Glasdegib
Acute myeloid leukemia
Clinical trial
Disease response
Efficacy
author_facet Jorge E. Cortes
Florian H. Heidel
Walter Fiedler
B. Douglas Smith
Tadeusz Robak
Pau Montesinos
Anna Candoni
Brian Leber
Mikkael A. Sekeres
Daniel A. Pollyea
Roxanne Ferdinand
Weidong Wendy Ma
Thomas O’Brien
Ashleigh O’Connell
Geoffrey Chan
Michael Heuser
author_sort Jorge E. Cortes
title Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy
title_short Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy
title_full Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy
title_fullStr Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy
title_full_unstemmed Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy
title_sort survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy
publisher BMC
series Journal of Hematology & Oncology
issn 1756-8722
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract Background The phase 2 BRIGHT AML 1003 trial evaluated efficacy and safety of glasdegib + low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The multicenter, open-label study randomized patients to receive glasdegib + LDAC (n = 78) or LDAC alone (n = 38). The rate of complete remission (CR) was 19.2% in the glasdegib + LDAC arm versus 2.6% in the LDAC arm (P = 0.015). Methods This post hoc analysis determines whether the clinical benefits of glasdegib are restricted to patients who achieve CR, or if they extend to those who do not achieve CR. Results In patients who did not achieve CR, the addition of glasdegib to LDAC improved overall survival (OS) versus LDAC alone (hazard ratio = 0.63 [95% confidence interval, 0.41–0.98]; P = 0.0182; median OS, 5.0 vs 4.1 months). Additionally, more patients receiving glasdegib + LDAC achieved durable recovery of absolute neutrophil count (≥ 1000/μl, 45.6% vs 35.5%), hemoglobin (≥ 9 g/dl, 54.4% vs 38.7%), and platelets (≥ 100,000/μl, 29.8% vs 9.7%). Transfusion independence was achieved by 15.0% and 2.9% of patients receiving glasdegib + LDAC and LDAC alone, respectively. Conclusions Collectively, these data suggest that there are clinical benefits with glasdegib in the absence of CR. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01546038 (March 7, 2012)
topic Glasdegib
Acute myeloid leukemia
Clinical trial
Disease response
Efficacy
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13045-020-00929-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jorgeecortes survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT florianhheidel survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT walterfiedler survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT bdouglassmith survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT tadeuszrobak survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT paumontesinos survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT annacandoni survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT brianleber survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT mikkaelasekeres survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT danielapollyea survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT roxanneferdinand survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT weidongwendyma survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT thomasobrien survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT ashleighoconnell survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT geoffreychan survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
AT michaelheuser survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy
_version_ 1724562891723505664