Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy
Abstract Background The phase 2 BRIGHT AML 1003 trial evaluated efficacy and safety of glasdegib + low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The multicenter, open-label study randomized patients to receive glasdegib + LDAC (n = 78) or L...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Journal of Hematology & Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13045-020-00929-8 |
id |
doaj-eb1cbed6f88d4b89add1a17240cfd403 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-eb1cbed6f88d4b89add1a17240cfd4032020-11-25T03:33:35ZengBMCJournal of Hematology & Oncology1756-87222020-07-0113111210.1186/s13045-020-00929-8Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapyJorge E. Cortes0Florian H. Heidel1Walter Fiedler2B. Douglas Smith3Tadeusz Robak4Pau Montesinos5Anna Candoni6Brian Leber7Mikkael A. Sekeres8Daniel A. Pollyea9Roxanne Ferdinand10Weidong Wendy Ma11Thomas O’Brien12Ashleigh O’Connell13Geoffrey Chan14Michael Heuser15Georgia Cancer CenterOtto-von-Guericke University Medical Center MagdeburgDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg-EppendorfJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer CenterDepartment of Hematology, Medical University of Łódź and Copernicus Memorial HospitalHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain; CIBERONC, Instituto Carlos IIIAzienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di UdineJuravinski Hospital at Hamilton Health SciencesLeukemia Program, Cleveland ClinicDivision of Hematology, University of Colorado School of MedicinePfizer OncologyPfizer OncologyPfizer OncologyPfizer OncologyPfizer OncologyDepartment of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical SchoolAbstract Background The phase 2 BRIGHT AML 1003 trial evaluated efficacy and safety of glasdegib + low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The multicenter, open-label study randomized patients to receive glasdegib + LDAC (n = 78) or LDAC alone (n = 38). The rate of complete remission (CR) was 19.2% in the glasdegib + LDAC arm versus 2.6% in the LDAC arm (P = 0.015). Methods This post hoc analysis determines whether the clinical benefits of glasdegib are restricted to patients who achieve CR, or if they extend to those who do not achieve CR. Results In patients who did not achieve CR, the addition of glasdegib to LDAC improved overall survival (OS) versus LDAC alone (hazard ratio = 0.63 [95% confidence interval, 0.41–0.98]; P = 0.0182; median OS, 5.0 vs 4.1 months). Additionally, more patients receiving glasdegib + LDAC achieved durable recovery of absolute neutrophil count (≥ 1000/μl, 45.6% vs 35.5%), hemoglobin (≥ 9 g/dl, 54.4% vs 38.7%), and platelets (≥ 100,000/μl, 29.8% vs 9.7%). Transfusion independence was achieved by 15.0% and 2.9% of patients receiving glasdegib + LDAC and LDAC alone, respectively. Conclusions Collectively, these data suggest that there are clinical benefits with glasdegib in the absence of CR. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01546038 (March 7, 2012)http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13045-020-00929-8GlasdegibAcute myeloid leukemiaClinical trialDisease responseEfficacy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jorge E. Cortes Florian H. Heidel Walter Fiedler B. Douglas Smith Tadeusz Robak Pau Montesinos Anna Candoni Brian Leber Mikkael A. Sekeres Daniel A. Pollyea Roxanne Ferdinand Weidong Wendy Ma Thomas O’Brien Ashleigh O’Connell Geoffrey Chan Michael Heuser |
spellingShingle |
Jorge E. Cortes Florian H. Heidel Walter Fiedler B. Douglas Smith Tadeusz Robak Pau Montesinos Anna Candoni Brian Leber Mikkael A. Sekeres Daniel A. Pollyea Roxanne Ferdinand Weidong Wendy Ma Thomas O’Brien Ashleigh O’Connell Geoffrey Chan Michael Heuser Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy Journal of Hematology & Oncology Glasdegib Acute myeloid leukemia Clinical trial Disease response Efficacy |
author_facet |
Jorge E. Cortes Florian H. Heidel Walter Fiedler B. Douglas Smith Tadeusz Robak Pau Montesinos Anna Candoni Brian Leber Mikkael A. Sekeres Daniel A. Pollyea Roxanne Ferdinand Weidong Wendy Ma Thomas O’Brien Ashleigh O’Connell Geoffrey Chan Michael Heuser |
author_sort |
Jorge E. Cortes |
title |
Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy |
title_short |
Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy |
title_full |
Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy |
title_fullStr |
Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy |
title_sort |
survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Journal of Hematology & Oncology |
issn |
1756-8722 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The phase 2 BRIGHT AML 1003 trial evaluated efficacy and safety of glasdegib + low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The multicenter, open-label study randomized patients to receive glasdegib + LDAC (n = 78) or LDAC alone (n = 38). The rate of complete remission (CR) was 19.2% in the glasdegib + LDAC arm versus 2.6% in the LDAC arm (P = 0.015). Methods This post hoc analysis determines whether the clinical benefits of glasdegib are restricted to patients who achieve CR, or if they extend to those who do not achieve CR. Results In patients who did not achieve CR, the addition of glasdegib to LDAC improved overall survival (OS) versus LDAC alone (hazard ratio = 0.63 [95% confidence interval, 0.41–0.98]; P = 0.0182; median OS, 5.0 vs 4.1 months). Additionally, more patients receiving glasdegib + LDAC achieved durable recovery of absolute neutrophil count (≥ 1000/μl, 45.6% vs 35.5%), hemoglobin (≥ 9 g/dl, 54.4% vs 38.7%), and platelets (≥ 100,000/μl, 29.8% vs 9.7%). Transfusion independence was achieved by 15.0% and 2.9% of patients receiving glasdegib + LDAC and LDAC alone, respectively. Conclusions Collectively, these data suggest that there are clinical benefits with glasdegib in the absence of CR. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01546038 (March 7, 2012) |
topic |
Glasdegib Acute myeloid leukemia Clinical trial Disease response Efficacy |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13045-020-00929-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jorgeecortes survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT florianhheidel survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT walterfiedler survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT bdouglassmith survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT tadeuszrobak survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT paumontesinos survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT annacandoni survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT brianleber survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT mikkaelasekeres survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT danielapollyea survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT roxanneferdinand survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT weidongwendyma survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT thomasobrien survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT ashleighoconnell survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT geoffreychan survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy AT michaelheuser survivaloutcomesandclinicalbenefitinpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiatreatedwithglasdegibandlowdosecytarabineaccordingtoresponsetotherapy |
_version_ |
1724562891723505664 |