Effect of a mass radio campaign on family behaviours and child survival in Burkina Faso: a repeated cross-sectional, cluster-randomised trial

Summary: Background: Media campaigns can potentially reach a large audience at relatively low cost but, to our knowledge, no randomised controlled trials have assessed their effect on a health outcome in a low-income country. We aimed to assess the effect of a radio campaign addressing family behav...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sophie Sarrassat, PhD, Nicolas Meda, ProfPhD, Hermann Badolo, MSc, Moctar Ouedraogo, MSc, Henri Some, BSc, Robert Bambara, MSc, Joanna Murray, PhD, Pieter Remes, PhD, Matthiew Lavoie, MA, Simon Cousens, ProfMA, Roy Head, MA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-03-01
Series:The Lancet Global Health
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X18300044
id doaj-eb5bb7d3e63d42b9bf85cc22fb0f477a
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sophie Sarrassat, PhD
Nicolas Meda, ProfPhD
Hermann Badolo, MSc
Moctar Ouedraogo, MSc
Henri Some, BSc
Robert Bambara, MSc
Joanna Murray, PhD
Pieter Remes, PhD
Matthiew Lavoie, MA
Simon Cousens, ProfMA
Roy Head, MA
spellingShingle Sophie Sarrassat, PhD
Nicolas Meda, ProfPhD
Hermann Badolo, MSc
Moctar Ouedraogo, MSc
Henri Some, BSc
Robert Bambara, MSc
Joanna Murray, PhD
Pieter Remes, PhD
Matthiew Lavoie, MA
Simon Cousens, ProfMA
Roy Head, MA
Effect of a mass radio campaign on family behaviours and child survival in Burkina Faso: a repeated cross-sectional, cluster-randomised trial
The Lancet Global Health
author_facet Sophie Sarrassat, PhD
Nicolas Meda, ProfPhD
Hermann Badolo, MSc
Moctar Ouedraogo, MSc
Henri Some, BSc
Robert Bambara, MSc
Joanna Murray, PhD
Pieter Remes, PhD
Matthiew Lavoie, MA
Simon Cousens, ProfMA
Roy Head, MA
author_sort Sophie Sarrassat, PhD
title Effect of a mass radio campaign on family behaviours and child survival in Burkina Faso: a repeated cross-sectional, cluster-randomised trial
title_short Effect of a mass radio campaign on family behaviours and child survival in Burkina Faso: a repeated cross-sectional, cluster-randomised trial
title_full Effect of a mass radio campaign on family behaviours and child survival in Burkina Faso: a repeated cross-sectional, cluster-randomised trial
title_fullStr Effect of a mass radio campaign on family behaviours and child survival in Burkina Faso: a repeated cross-sectional, cluster-randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of a mass radio campaign on family behaviours and child survival in Burkina Faso: a repeated cross-sectional, cluster-randomised trial
title_sort effect of a mass radio campaign on family behaviours and child survival in burkina faso: a repeated cross-sectional, cluster-randomised trial
publisher Elsevier
series The Lancet Global Health
issn 2214-109X
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Summary: Background: Media campaigns can potentially reach a large audience at relatively low cost but, to our knowledge, no randomised controlled trials have assessed their effect on a health outcome in a low-income country. We aimed to assess the effect of a radio campaign addressing family behaviours on all-cause post-neonatal under-5 child mortality in rural Burkina Faso. Methods: In this repeated cross-sectional, cluster randomised trial, clusters (distinct geographical areas in rural Burkina Faso with at least 40 000 inhabitants) were selected by Development Media International based on their high radio listenership (>60% of women listening to the radio in the past week) and minimum distances between radio stations to exclude population-level contamination. Clusters were randomly allocated to receive the intervention (a comprehensive radio campaign) or control group (no radio media campaign). Household surveys were performed at baseline (from December, 2011, to February, 2012), midline (in November, 2013, and after 20 months of campaigning), and endline (from November, 2014, to March, 2015, after 32 months of campaigning). Primary analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis, based on cluster-level summaries and adjusted for imbalances between groups at baseline. The primary outcome was all-cause post-neonatal under-5 child mortality. The trial was designed to detect a 20% reduction in the primary outcome with a power of 80%. Routine data from health facilities were also analysed for evidence of changes in use and these data had high statistical power. The indicators measured were new antenatal care attendances, facility deliveries, and under-5 consultations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, number NCT01517230. Findings: The intervention ran from March, 2012, to January, 2015. 14 clusters were selected and randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=7) or the control group (n=7). The average number of villages included per cluster was 34 in the control group and 29 in the intervention group. 2269 (82%) of 2784 women in the intervention group reported recognising the campaign's radio spots at endline. Post-neonatal under-5 child mortality decreased from 93·3 to 58·5 per 1000 livebirths in the control group and from 125·1 to 85·1 per 1000 livebirths in the intervention group. There was no evidence of an intervention effect (risk ratio 1·00, 95% CI 0·82–1·22; p>0·999). In the first year of the intervention, under-5 consultations increased from 68 681 to 83 022 in the control group and from 79 852 to 111 758 in the intervention group. The intervention effect using interrupted time-series analysis was 35% (95% CI 20–51; p<0·0001). New antenatal care attendances decreased from 13 129 to 12 997 in the control group and increased from 19 658 to 20 202 in the intervention group in the first year (intervention effect 6%, 95% CI 2–10; p=0·004). Deliveries in health facilities decreased from 10 598 to 10 533 in the control group and increased from 12 155 to 12 902 in the intervention group in the first year (intervention effect 7%, 95% CI 2–11; p=0·004). Interpretation: A comprehensive radio campaign had no detectable effect on child mortality. Substantial decreases in child mortality were observed in both groups over the intervention period, reducing our ability to detect an effect. This, nevertheless, represents the first randomised controlled trial to show that mass media alone can change health-seeking behaviours. Funding: Wellcome Trust and Planet Wheeler Foundation.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X18300044
work_keys_str_mv AT sophiesarrassatphd effectofamassradiocampaignonfamilybehavioursandchildsurvivalinburkinafasoarepeatedcrosssectionalclusterrandomisedtrial
AT nicolasmedaprofphd effectofamassradiocampaignonfamilybehavioursandchildsurvivalinburkinafasoarepeatedcrosssectionalclusterrandomisedtrial
AT hermannbadolomsc effectofamassradiocampaignonfamilybehavioursandchildsurvivalinburkinafasoarepeatedcrosssectionalclusterrandomisedtrial
AT moctarouedraogomsc effectofamassradiocampaignonfamilybehavioursandchildsurvivalinburkinafasoarepeatedcrosssectionalclusterrandomisedtrial
AT henrisomebsc effectofamassradiocampaignonfamilybehavioursandchildsurvivalinburkinafasoarepeatedcrosssectionalclusterrandomisedtrial
AT robertbambaramsc effectofamassradiocampaignonfamilybehavioursandchildsurvivalinburkinafasoarepeatedcrosssectionalclusterrandomisedtrial
AT joannamurrayphd effectofamassradiocampaignonfamilybehavioursandchildsurvivalinburkinafasoarepeatedcrosssectionalclusterrandomisedtrial
AT pieterremesphd effectofamassradiocampaignonfamilybehavioursandchildsurvivalinburkinafasoarepeatedcrosssectionalclusterrandomisedtrial
AT matthiewlavoiema effectofamassradiocampaignonfamilybehavioursandchildsurvivalinburkinafasoarepeatedcrosssectionalclusterrandomisedtrial
AT simoncousensprofma effectofamassradiocampaignonfamilybehavioursandchildsurvivalinburkinafasoarepeatedcrosssectionalclusterrandomisedtrial
AT royheadma effectofamassradiocampaignonfamilybehavioursandchildsurvivalinburkinafasoarepeatedcrosssectionalclusterrandomisedtrial
_version_ 1724987199202525184
spelling doaj-eb5bb7d3e63d42b9bf85cc22fb0f477a2020-11-25T01:54:28ZengElsevierThe Lancet Global Health2214-109X2018-03-0163e330e341Effect of a mass radio campaign on family behaviours and child survival in Burkina Faso: a repeated cross-sectional, cluster-randomised trialSophie Sarrassat, PhD0Nicolas Meda, ProfPhD1Hermann Badolo, MSc2Moctar Ouedraogo, MSc3Henri Some, BSc4Robert Bambara, MSc5Joanna Murray, PhD6Pieter Remes, PhD7Matthiew Lavoie, MA8Simon Cousens, ProfMA9Roy Head, MA10Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Correspondence to: Dr Sophie Sarrassat, Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UKCentre Muraz, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina FasoCentre Muraz, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina FasoAfricsanté, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina FasoAfricsanté, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina FasoDirection Générale des Études et des Statistiques Sectorielles (DGESS), Ministère de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina FasoDevelopment Media International, London, UKDevelopment Media International, Ouagadougou, Burkina FasoDevelopment Media International, Ouagadougou, Burkina FasoCentre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UKDevelopment Media International, London, UKSummary: Background: Media campaigns can potentially reach a large audience at relatively low cost but, to our knowledge, no randomised controlled trials have assessed their effect on a health outcome in a low-income country. We aimed to assess the effect of a radio campaign addressing family behaviours on all-cause post-neonatal under-5 child mortality in rural Burkina Faso. Methods: In this repeated cross-sectional, cluster randomised trial, clusters (distinct geographical areas in rural Burkina Faso with at least 40 000 inhabitants) were selected by Development Media International based on their high radio listenership (>60% of women listening to the radio in the past week) and minimum distances between radio stations to exclude population-level contamination. Clusters were randomly allocated to receive the intervention (a comprehensive radio campaign) or control group (no radio media campaign). Household surveys were performed at baseline (from December, 2011, to February, 2012), midline (in November, 2013, and after 20 months of campaigning), and endline (from November, 2014, to March, 2015, after 32 months of campaigning). Primary analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis, based on cluster-level summaries and adjusted for imbalances between groups at baseline. The primary outcome was all-cause post-neonatal under-5 child mortality. The trial was designed to detect a 20% reduction in the primary outcome with a power of 80%. Routine data from health facilities were also analysed for evidence of changes in use and these data had high statistical power. The indicators measured were new antenatal care attendances, facility deliveries, and under-5 consultations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, number NCT01517230. Findings: The intervention ran from March, 2012, to January, 2015. 14 clusters were selected and randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=7) or the control group (n=7). The average number of villages included per cluster was 34 in the control group and 29 in the intervention group. 2269 (82%) of 2784 women in the intervention group reported recognising the campaign's radio spots at endline. Post-neonatal under-5 child mortality decreased from 93·3 to 58·5 per 1000 livebirths in the control group and from 125·1 to 85·1 per 1000 livebirths in the intervention group. There was no evidence of an intervention effect (risk ratio 1·00, 95% CI 0·82–1·22; p>0·999). In the first year of the intervention, under-5 consultations increased from 68 681 to 83 022 in the control group and from 79 852 to 111 758 in the intervention group. The intervention effect using interrupted time-series analysis was 35% (95% CI 20–51; p<0·0001). New antenatal care attendances decreased from 13 129 to 12 997 in the control group and increased from 19 658 to 20 202 in the intervention group in the first year (intervention effect 6%, 95% CI 2–10; p=0·004). Deliveries in health facilities decreased from 10 598 to 10 533 in the control group and increased from 12 155 to 12 902 in the intervention group in the first year (intervention effect 7%, 95% CI 2–11; p=0·004). Interpretation: A comprehensive radio campaign had no detectable effect on child mortality. Substantial decreases in child mortality were observed in both groups over the intervention period, reducing our ability to detect an effect. This, nevertheless, represents the first randomised controlled trial to show that mass media alone can change health-seeking behaviours. Funding: Wellcome Trust and Planet Wheeler Foundation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X18300044