Effect of chlorhexidine chip as an adjunct in non-surgical management of periodontal pockets: a meta-analysis

Abstract Background The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the difference in treatment outcomes between sub-gingival placement of chlorhexidine chip (CHX chip) in adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) and SRP alone for the management of periodontal pockets in patients suffering from chron...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lili Ma, Xiuchun Diao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-09-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-020-01247-8
id doaj-eb6dffdbea854e9d8b963775191a9424
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eb6dffdbea854e9d8b963775191a94242020-11-25T03:48:37ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312020-09-0120111410.1186/s12903-020-01247-8Effect of chlorhexidine chip as an adjunct in non-surgical management of periodontal pockets: a meta-analysisLili Ma0Xiuchun Diao1Department of stomatology, Zaozhuang Maternal and Child Health HospitalDepartment of stomatology, Zaozhuang Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineAbstract Background The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the difference in treatment outcomes between sub-gingival placement of chlorhexidine chip (CHX chip) in adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) and SRP alone for the management of periodontal pockets in patients suffering from chronic periodontitis. Methods We searched the MEDLINE (PubMed), SCOPUS and CENTRAL databases and identified 15 randomized clinical trials published within the last decade (2007–2019): 9 with split-mouth design and 6 with parallel study design. We extracted data and performed both qualitative and quantitative syntheses. The primary outcomes assessed were gain in clinical attachment level (CAL), reduction in probing pocket depth (PPD), improvement in gingival inflammation, and results of microbiological assays. Results We used meta-analysis plots to assess all the clinical outcomes. The mean differences in PPD reductions at 1 month (MD 0.63), 3 months (MD 0.69), and 6 months (MD 0.75); and the CAL gains at 1 month (MD 0.54), 3 months (MD 0.64), and 6 months (MD 0.68) showed more favorable responses in sites treated with the CHX chip as an adjuvant to SRP, than in sites treated with SRP alone. Conclusion SRP with adjunctive CHX chips showed better clinical outcomes than SRP alone for the management of periodontal pockets in patients with chronic periodontitis.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-020-01247-8Chlorhexidine ChipChronic periodontitisScaling and root PlaningPeriodontal pockets
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lili Ma
Xiuchun Diao
spellingShingle Lili Ma
Xiuchun Diao
Effect of chlorhexidine chip as an adjunct in non-surgical management of periodontal pockets: a meta-analysis
BMC Oral Health
Chlorhexidine Chip
Chronic periodontitis
Scaling and root Planing
Periodontal pockets
author_facet Lili Ma
Xiuchun Diao
author_sort Lili Ma
title Effect of chlorhexidine chip as an adjunct in non-surgical management of periodontal pockets: a meta-analysis
title_short Effect of chlorhexidine chip as an adjunct in non-surgical management of periodontal pockets: a meta-analysis
title_full Effect of chlorhexidine chip as an adjunct in non-surgical management of periodontal pockets: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effect of chlorhexidine chip as an adjunct in non-surgical management of periodontal pockets: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of chlorhexidine chip as an adjunct in non-surgical management of periodontal pockets: a meta-analysis
title_sort effect of chlorhexidine chip as an adjunct in non-surgical management of periodontal pockets: a meta-analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Oral Health
issn 1472-6831
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Abstract Background The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the difference in treatment outcomes between sub-gingival placement of chlorhexidine chip (CHX chip) in adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) and SRP alone for the management of periodontal pockets in patients suffering from chronic periodontitis. Methods We searched the MEDLINE (PubMed), SCOPUS and CENTRAL databases and identified 15 randomized clinical trials published within the last decade (2007–2019): 9 with split-mouth design and 6 with parallel study design. We extracted data and performed both qualitative and quantitative syntheses. The primary outcomes assessed were gain in clinical attachment level (CAL), reduction in probing pocket depth (PPD), improvement in gingival inflammation, and results of microbiological assays. Results We used meta-analysis plots to assess all the clinical outcomes. The mean differences in PPD reductions at 1 month (MD 0.63), 3 months (MD 0.69), and 6 months (MD 0.75); and the CAL gains at 1 month (MD 0.54), 3 months (MD 0.64), and 6 months (MD 0.68) showed more favorable responses in sites treated with the CHX chip as an adjuvant to SRP, than in sites treated with SRP alone. Conclusion SRP with adjunctive CHX chips showed better clinical outcomes than SRP alone for the management of periodontal pockets in patients with chronic periodontitis.
topic Chlorhexidine Chip
Chronic periodontitis
Scaling and root Planing
Periodontal pockets
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-020-01247-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lilima effectofchlorhexidinechipasanadjunctinnonsurgicalmanagementofperiodontalpocketsametaanalysis
AT xiuchundiao effectofchlorhexidinechipasanadjunctinnonsurgicalmanagementofperiodontalpocketsametaanalysis
_version_ 1724497981513662464