Does habitat variability really promote metabolic network modularity?

The hypothesis that variability in natural habitats promotes modular organization is widely accepted for cellular networks. However, results of some data analyses and theoretical studies have begun to cast doubt on the impact of habitat variability on modularity in metabolic networks. Therefore, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kazuhiro Takemoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3625173?pdf=render
id doaj-eb7173bf9ce34dc0bb978d971883a1ab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eb7173bf9ce34dc0bb978d971883a1ab2020-11-25T01:34:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0184e6134810.1371/journal.pone.0061348Does habitat variability really promote metabolic network modularity?Kazuhiro TakemotoThe hypothesis that variability in natural habitats promotes modular organization is widely accepted for cellular networks. However, results of some data analyses and theoretical studies have begun to cast doubt on the impact of habitat variability on modularity in metabolic networks. Therefore, we re-evaluated this hypothesis using statistical data analysis and current metabolic information. We were unable to conclude that an increase in modularity was the result of habitat variability. Although horizontal gene transfer was also considered because it may contribute for survival in a variety of environments, closely related to habitat variability, and is known to be positively correlated with network modularity, such a positive correlation was not concluded in the latest version of metabolic networks. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the previously observed increase in network modularity due to habitat variability and horizontal gene transfer was probably due to a lack of available data on metabolic reactions. Instead, we determined that modularity in metabolic networks is dependent on species growth conditions. These results may not entirely discount the impact of habitat variability and horizontal gene transfer. Rather, they highlight the need for a more suitable definition of habitat variability and a more careful examination of relationships of the network modularity with horizontal gene transfer, habitats, and environments.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3625173?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kazuhiro Takemoto
spellingShingle Kazuhiro Takemoto
Does habitat variability really promote metabolic network modularity?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Kazuhiro Takemoto
author_sort Kazuhiro Takemoto
title Does habitat variability really promote metabolic network modularity?
title_short Does habitat variability really promote metabolic network modularity?
title_full Does habitat variability really promote metabolic network modularity?
title_fullStr Does habitat variability really promote metabolic network modularity?
title_full_unstemmed Does habitat variability really promote metabolic network modularity?
title_sort does habitat variability really promote metabolic network modularity?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description The hypothesis that variability in natural habitats promotes modular organization is widely accepted for cellular networks. However, results of some data analyses and theoretical studies have begun to cast doubt on the impact of habitat variability on modularity in metabolic networks. Therefore, we re-evaluated this hypothesis using statistical data analysis and current metabolic information. We were unable to conclude that an increase in modularity was the result of habitat variability. Although horizontal gene transfer was also considered because it may contribute for survival in a variety of environments, closely related to habitat variability, and is known to be positively correlated with network modularity, such a positive correlation was not concluded in the latest version of metabolic networks. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the previously observed increase in network modularity due to habitat variability and horizontal gene transfer was probably due to a lack of available data on metabolic reactions. Instead, we determined that modularity in metabolic networks is dependent on species growth conditions. These results may not entirely discount the impact of habitat variability and horizontal gene transfer. Rather, they highlight the need for a more suitable definition of habitat variability and a more careful examination of relationships of the network modularity with horizontal gene transfer, habitats, and environments.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3625173?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT kazuhirotakemoto doeshabitatvariabilityreallypromotemetabolicnetworkmodularity
_version_ 1725070603168251904