Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer: The European Point of View

Objective. Multiple Asian studies have proved the feasibility of laparoscopic approach for surgical treatment of gastric cancer. The difference between Asian and European patients could limit their application in Europe. We reviewed the literature for European studies comparing open gastrectomy with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mickael Chevallay, Minoa Jung, Felix Berlth, Chon Seung-Hun, Philippe Morel, Stefan Mönig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Oncology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8738502
id doaj-ebb9740807724e15b7c9fb5878934155
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ebb9740807724e15b7c9fb58789341552020-11-25T03:04:38ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Oncology1687-84501687-84692019-01-01201910.1155/2019/87385028738502Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer: The European Point of ViewMickael Chevallay0Minoa Jung1Felix Berlth2Chon Seung-Hun3Philippe Morel4Stefan Mönig5Department of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, SwitzerlandDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, SwitzerlandDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Köln, Köln, GermanyDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Köln, Köln, GermanyDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, SwitzerlandDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, SwitzerlandObjective. Multiple Asian studies have proved the feasibility of laparoscopic approach for surgical treatment of gastric cancer. The difference between Asian and European patients could limit their application in Europe. We reviewed the literature for European studies comparing open gastrectomy with laparoscopic approach in the treatment of gastric cancer. Method. We searched the keywords gastric cancer and laparoscopy in MEDLINE and EMBASE. We included all studies published between 1990 and 2016 and conducted in Europe. Result. We found 1 randomized and 13 cohort studies which compared laparoscopic with open gastrectomy. We found no mean difference in the number of lymph nodes harvested between laparoscopic and open group (mean difference: -0.49; 95% CI: -2.42; 1.44, p=0.62) and no difference of short-term or long-term mortality (short-term odds ratio: 0.74, p=0.47; long-term odds ratio: 0.65, p=0.11). We found a longer operative time in the laparoscopic group (mean difference: 35.75 minutes, p<0.01) but lesser reoperation rate than the open group (odds ratio: 1.55 p=0.01). Conclusion. European based population studies found results comparable with their Asian counterpart. In the current state of evidence, minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer is safe and can achieve the same oncological results.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8738502
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mickael Chevallay
Minoa Jung
Felix Berlth
Chon Seung-Hun
Philippe Morel
Stefan Mönig
spellingShingle Mickael Chevallay
Minoa Jung
Felix Berlth
Chon Seung-Hun
Philippe Morel
Stefan Mönig
Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer: The European Point of View
Journal of Oncology
author_facet Mickael Chevallay
Minoa Jung
Felix Berlth
Chon Seung-Hun
Philippe Morel
Stefan Mönig
author_sort Mickael Chevallay
title Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer: The European Point of View
title_short Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer: The European Point of View
title_full Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer: The European Point of View
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer: The European Point of View
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer: The European Point of View
title_sort laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: the european point of view
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Oncology
issn 1687-8450
1687-8469
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Objective. Multiple Asian studies have proved the feasibility of laparoscopic approach for surgical treatment of gastric cancer. The difference between Asian and European patients could limit their application in Europe. We reviewed the literature for European studies comparing open gastrectomy with laparoscopic approach in the treatment of gastric cancer. Method. We searched the keywords gastric cancer and laparoscopy in MEDLINE and EMBASE. We included all studies published between 1990 and 2016 and conducted in Europe. Result. We found 1 randomized and 13 cohort studies which compared laparoscopic with open gastrectomy. We found no mean difference in the number of lymph nodes harvested between laparoscopic and open group (mean difference: -0.49; 95% CI: -2.42; 1.44, p=0.62) and no difference of short-term or long-term mortality (short-term odds ratio: 0.74, p=0.47; long-term odds ratio: 0.65, p=0.11). We found a longer operative time in the laparoscopic group (mean difference: 35.75 minutes, p<0.01) but lesser reoperation rate than the open group (odds ratio: 1.55 p=0.01). Conclusion. European based population studies found results comparable with their Asian counterpart. In the current state of evidence, minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer is safe and can achieve the same oncological results.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8738502
work_keys_str_mv AT mickaelchevallay laparoscopicsurgeryforgastriccancertheeuropeanpointofview
AT minoajung laparoscopicsurgeryforgastriccancertheeuropeanpointofview
AT felixberlth laparoscopicsurgeryforgastriccancertheeuropeanpointofview
AT chonseunghun laparoscopicsurgeryforgastriccancertheeuropeanpointofview
AT philippemorel laparoscopicsurgeryforgastriccancertheeuropeanpointofview
AT stefanmonig laparoscopicsurgeryforgastriccancertheeuropeanpointofview
_version_ 1724680596236533760