Comparison between bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine mixture and bupivacaine–magnesium mixture when used for wound infiltration before skin incision in surgeries for hernia repair regarding their intraoperative and postoperative analgesic effects

Abstract Background Wound infiltration with local anesthetics was developed to provide intraoperative and postoperative analgesia and to reduce opioid consumption and its side effects. Methods This is a prospective randomized, double-blinded study. A total of 45 patients, American Society of Anesthe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hala Ezzat Abdelnaim, Nashwa Nabil Mohamed, Amany Hassan Saleh, Ahmed Nabih Youssef
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-11-01
Series:Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42077-018-0012-8
id doaj-ebbb9da04774454597da534480e1c66b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ebbb9da04774454597da534480e1c66b2020-11-25T02:26:18ZengSpringerOpenAin Shams Journal of Anesthesiology2090-925X2018-11-011011910.1186/s42077-018-0012-8Comparison between bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine mixture and bupivacaine–magnesium mixture when used for wound infiltration before skin incision in surgeries for hernia repair regarding their intraoperative and postoperative analgesic effectsHala Ezzat Abdelnaim0Nashwa Nabil Mohamed1Amany Hassan Saleh2Ahmed Nabih Youssef3Department of Anesthesia, Surgical Intensive, Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityDepartment of Anesthesia, Surgical Intensive, Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityDepartment of Anesthesia, Surgical Intensive, Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityDepartment of Anesthesia, Surgical Intensive, Care and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityAbstract Background Wound infiltration with local anesthetics was developed to provide intraoperative and postoperative analgesia and to reduce opioid consumption and its side effects. Methods This is a prospective randomized, double-blinded study. A total of 45 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–II, aged from 18 to 60 years scheduled for open abdominal surgeries were randomly assigned to one of the following groups to receive wound infiltration 2 min prior to skin incision: group I: bupivacaine 0.25% alone (20 ml) (n = 15), group II: bupivacaine 0.25% + magnesium sulfate (1 g) (20 ml) (n = 15), and group III: bupivacaine 0.25% + dexmedetomidine (70 μg) (20 ml) (n = 15). Induction and maintenance were done according to our hospital protocol. Heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) at baseline and every 15 min till the end of surgery, the need for supplemental fentanyl, and the concentration of inhalational anesthetic were assessed. Postoperatively, Ramsay sedation scale was assessed 10 min post extubation and every 30 min for 6 h; visual analog scale was assessed at rest and every 30 min for 6 h postoperatively; time to the first request of analgesia and the cumulative analgesic consumption were recorded; HR and SBP were recorded for 6 h. Results The concentration of inhalational isoflurane and the need for supplemental fentanyl intraoperatively were significantly lower in group III than in groups I and II. Postoperatively in group III, HR and SBP and visual analog scale scores were significantly lower compared with groups I and II. Ramsay sedation score was significantly higher in group III up to 2 h after recovery in comparison to groups I and II. Group III showed longer time for the first request of analgesia and a lower need for postoperative opioids in comparison to groups I and II. Conclusions Wound infiltration with dexmedetomidine–bupivacaine mixture before skin incision decreases the anesthetic requirements, provides prolonged analgesia, and decreases the need for rescue analgesics in patients undergoing open abdominal surgeries.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42077-018-0012-8AnalgesiaDexmedetomidineOpen abdominal surgeriesWound infiltration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hala Ezzat Abdelnaim
Nashwa Nabil Mohamed
Amany Hassan Saleh
Ahmed Nabih Youssef
spellingShingle Hala Ezzat Abdelnaim
Nashwa Nabil Mohamed
Amany Hassan Saleh
Ahmed Nabih Youssef
Comparison between bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine mixture and bupivacaine–magnesium mixture when used for wound infiltration before skin incision in surgeries for hernia repair regarding their intraoperative and postoperative analgesic effects
Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology
Analgesia
Dexmedetomidine
Open abdominal surgeries
Wound infiltration
author_facet Hala Ezzat Abdelnaim
Nashwa Nabil Mohamed
Amany Hassan Saleh
Ahmed Nabih Youssef
author_sort Hala Ezzat Abdelnaim
title Comparison between bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine mixture and bupivacaine–magnesium mixture when used for wound infiltration before skin incision in surgeries for hernia repair regarding their intraoperative and postoperative analgesic effects
title_short Comparison between bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine mixture and bupivacaine–magnesium mixture when used for wound infiltration before skin incision in surgeries for hernia repair regarding their intraoperative and postoperative analgesic effects
title_full Comparison between bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine mixture and bupivacaine–magnesium mixture when used for wound infiltration before skin incision in surgeries for hernia repair regarding their intraoperative and postoperative analgesic effects
title_fullStr Comparison between bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine mixture and bupivacaine–magnesium mixture when used for wound infiltration before skin incision in surgeries for hernia repair regarding their intraoperative and postoperative analgesic effects
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine mixture and bupivacaine–magnesium mixture when used for wound infiltration before skin incision in surgeries for hernia repair regarding their intraoperative and postoperative analgesic effects
title_sort comparison between bupivacaine–dexmedetomidine mixture and bupivacaine–magnesium mixture when used for wound infiltration before skin incision in surgeries for hernia repair regarding their intraoperative and postoperative analgesic effects
publisher SpringerOpen
series Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology
issn 2090-925X
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Abstract Background Wound infiltration with local anesthetics was developed to provide intraoperative and postoperative analgesia and to reduce opioid consumption and its side effects. Methods This is a prospective randomized, double-blinded study. A total of 45 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–II, aged from 18 to 60 years scheduled for open abdominal surgeries were randomly assigned to one of the following groups to receive wound infiltration 2 min prior to skin incision: group I: bupivacaine 0.25% alone (20 ml) (n = 15), group II: bupivacaine 0.25% + magnesium sulfate (1 g) (20 ml) (n = 15), and group III: bupivacaine 0.25% + dexmedetomidine (70 μg) (20 ml) (n = 15). Induction and maintenance were done according to our hospital protocol. Heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) at baseline and every 15 min till the end of surgery, the need for supplemental fentanyl, and the concentration of inhalational anesthetic were assessed. Postoperatively, Ramsay sedation scale was assessed 10 min post extubation and every 30 min for 6 h; visual analog scale was assessed at rest and every 30 min for 6 h postoperatively; time to the first request of analgesia and the cumulative analgesic consumption were recorded; HR and SBP were recorded for 6 h. Results The concentration of inhalational isoflurane and the need for supplemental fentanyl intraoperatively were significantly lower in group III than in groups I and II. Postoperatively in group III, HR and SBP and visual analog scale scores were significantly lower compared with groups I and II. Ramsay sedation score was significantly higher in group III up to 2 h after recovery in comparison to groups I and II. Group III showed longer time for the first request of analgesia and a lower need for postoperative opioids in comparison to groups I and II. Conclusions Wound infiltration with dexmedetomidine–bupivacaine mixture before skin incision decreases the anesthetic requirements, provides prolonged analgesia, and decreases the need for rescue analgesics in patients undergoing open abdominal surgeries.
topic Analgesia
Dexmedetomidine
Open abdominal surgeries
Wound infiltration
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s42077-018-0012-8
work_keys_str_mv AT halaezzatabdelnaim comparisonbetweenbupivacainedexmedetomidinemixtureandbupivacainemagnesiummixturewhenusedforwoundinfiltrationbeforeskinincisioninsurgeriesforherniarepairregardingtheirintraoperativeandpostoperativeanalgesiceffects
AT nashwanabilmohamed comparisonbetweenbupivacainedexmedetomidinemixtureandbupivacainemagnesiummixturewhenusedforwoundinfiltrationbeforeskinincisioninsurgeriesforherniarepairregardingtheirintraoperativeandpostoperativeanalgesiceffects
AT amanyhassansaleh comparisonbetweenbupivacainedexmedetomidinemixtureandbupivacainemagnesiummixturewhenusedforwoundinfiltrationbeforeskinincisioninsurgeriesforherniarepairregardingtheirintraoperativeandpostoperativeanalgesiceffects
AT ahmednabihyoussef comparisonbetweenbupivacainedexmedetomidinemixtureandbupivacainemagnesiummixturewhenusedforwoundinfiltrationbeforeskinincisioninsurgeriesforherniarepairregardingtheirintraoperativeandpostoperativeanalgesiceffects
_version_ 1724847962495909888