Effect of parenteral selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is currently unclear whether parenteral selenium supplementation should be recommended in the management of critically ill patients. Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of parenteral selenium supplementation on clinical outcomes. METHODS/PRIN...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ting-Shuo Huang, Yu-Chiau Shyu, Huang-Yang Chen, Li-Mei Lin, Chia-Ying Lo, Shin-Sheng Yuan, Pei-Jer Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3555933?pdf=render
id doaj-ebc27f72668d4f71ae1806c5fcd06aa6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ebc27f72668d4f71ae1806c5fcd06aa62020-11-25T01:34:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0181e5443110.1371/journal.pone.0054431Effect of parenteral selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ting-Shuo HuangYu-Chiau ShyuHuang-Yang ChenLi-Mei LinChia-Ying LoShin-Sheng YuanPei-Jer ChenBACKGROUND: It is currently unclear whether parenteral selenium supplementation should be recommended in the management of critically ill patients. Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of parenteral selenium supplementation on clinical outcomes. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Randomized trials investigating parenteral selenium supplementation administered in addition to standard of care to critically ill patients were included. CENTRAL, Medline, EMBASE, the Science Citation Index, and CINAHL were searched with complementary manual searches. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Trials published in any language were included. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. A third author was consulted to resolve disagreements and for quality assurance. Twelve trials were included and meta-analysis was performed on nine trials that recruited critically ill septic patients. These comprised 965 participants in total. Of these, 148 patients (30.7%) in the treatment groups, and 180 patients (37.3%) in control groups died. Parenteral selenium treatment significantly reduced all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis (relative risk [RR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99, p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the administration schedule employing longer duration (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.94, p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%), loading boluses (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.94, p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%) or high-dose selenium treatment (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.99, p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%) might be associated with a lower mortality risk. There was no evidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Parenteral selenium supplementation reduces risk of mortality among critically ill patients with sepsis. Owing to the varied methodological quality of the studies, future high-quality randomized trials that directly focus on the effect of adequate-duration of parenteral selenium supplementation for severe septic patients are needed to confirm our results. Clinicians should consider these findings when treating this high-risk population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2011; CRD42011001768.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3555933?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ting-Shuo Huang
Yu-Chiau Shyu
Huang-Yang Chen
Li-Mei Lin
Chia-Ying Lo
Shin-Sheng Yuan
Pei-Jer Chen
spellingShingle Ting-Shuo Huang
Yu-Chiau Shyu
Huang-Yang Chen
Li-Mei Lin
Chia-Ying Lo
Shin-Sheng Yuan
Pei-Jer Chen
Effect of parenteral selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ting-Shuo Huang
Yu-Chiau Shyu
Huang-Yang Chen
Li-Mei Lin
Chia-Ying Lo
Shin-Sheng Yuan
Pei-Jer Chen
author_sort Ting-Shuo Huang
title Effect of parenteral selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Effect of parenteral selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Effect of parenteral selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Effect of parenteral selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Effect of parenteral selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort effect of parenteral selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description BACKGROUND: It is currently unclear whether parenteral selenium supplementation should be recommended in the management of critically ill patients. Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of parenteral selenium supplementation on clinical outcomes. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Randomized trials investigating parenteral selenium supplementation administered in addition to standard of care to critically ill patients were included. CENTRAL, Medline, EMBASE, the Science Citation Index, and CINAHL were searched with complementary manual searches. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Trials published in any language were included. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. A third author was consulted to resolve disagreements and for quality assurance. Twelve trials were included and meta-analysis was performed on nine trials that recruited critically ill septic patients. These comprised 965 participants in total. Of these, 148 patients (30.7%) in the treatment groups, and 180 patients (37.3%) in control groups died. Parenteral selenium treatment significantly reduced all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis (relative risk [RR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99, p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the administration schedule employing longer duration (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.94, p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%), loading boluses (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.94, p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%) or high-dose selenium treatment (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.99, p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%) might be associated with a lower mortality risk. There was no evidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Parenteral selenium supplementation reduces risk of mortality among critically ill patients with sepsis. Owing to the varied methodological quality of the studies, future high-quality randomized trials that directly focus on the effect of adequate-duration of parenteral selenium supplementation for severe septic patients are needed to confirm our results. Clinicians should consider these findings when treating this high-risk population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2011; CRD42011001768.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3555933?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT tingshuohuang effectofparenteralseleniumsupplementationincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuchiaushyu effectofparenteralseleniumsupplementationincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangyangchen effectofparenteralseleniumsupplementationincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT limeilin effectofparenteralseleniumsupplementationincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chiayinglo effectofparenteralseleniumsupplementationincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shinshengyuan effectofparenteralseleniumsupplementationincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT peijerchen effectofparenteralseleniumsupplementationincriticallyillpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1725069690397523968