Comparison of Efficacy of FESS (Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery) Versus Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy in Patients with Nasal Polyposis

Background : To Compare the efficacy of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) with Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy in patients with nasal polyposis Methods: In this comparative study patients with sino-polyposis were divided into two groups Group-A was allotted to FESS and Group-B to the pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Syed Jawad Hussain Shah et al.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rawalpindi Medical University 2018-09-01
Series:Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/922
id doaj-ebccf86d59ef40ee80db9305f9aa6aa0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ebccf86d59ef40ee80db9305f9aa6aa02020-11-25T03:06:09ZengRawalpindi Medical UniversityJournal of Rawalpindi Medical College1683-35621683-35702018-09-01Comparison of Efficacy of FESS (Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery) Versus Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy in Patients with Nasal PolyposisSyed Jawad Hussain Shah et al.,0Department of ENT, DHQ Hospital Bagh AJKBackground : To Compare the efficacy of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) with Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy in patients with nasal polyposis Methods: In this comparative study patients with sino-polyposis were divided into two groups Group-A was allotted to FESS and Group-B to the patients with conventional endoscopic endonasal-polypectomy. All patients,after surgery,were followed till 4 months for efficacy. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for qualitative variable i.e. gender and efficacy. Chi square test was applied to compare the significant difference regarding efficacy of both groups. p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Stratification was done for age and gender of the patients and duration of the disease to control the effect modifiers. Post stratification chi-square test was applied. Results: In group A, the efficacy was found n 82.67% whereas in group B the efficacy was observed in 61.33%. By using chi-square test, the significant association was found between study group and efficacy having p- value = 0.004. Conclusion: Efficacy was significantly higher in the FESS group as compared to conventional intranasal polypectomy in patients with sinonasal polyposis. https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/922Sinonasal PolyposisFunctional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery FESSConventional Intranasal Polypectomy.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Syed Jawad Hussain Shah et al.,
spellingShingle Syed Jawad Hussain Shah et al.,
Comparison of Efficacy of FESS (Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery) Versus Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy in Patients with Nasal Polyposis
Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Sinonasal Polyposis
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery FESS
Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy.
author_facet Syed Jawad Hussain Shah et al.,
author_sort Syed Jawad Hussain Shah et al.,
title Comparison of Efficacy of FESS (Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery) Versus Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy in Patients with Nasal Polyposis
title_short Comparison of Efficacy of FESS (Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery) Versus Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy in Patients with Nasal Polyposis
title_full Comparison of Efficacy of FESS (Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery) Versus Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy in Patients with Nasal Polyposis
title_fullStr Comparison of Efficacy of FESS (Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery) Versus Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy in Patients with Nasal Polyposis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Efficacy of FESS (Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery) Versus Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy in Patients with Nasal Polyposis
title_sort comparison of efficacy of fess (functional endoscopic sinus surgery) versus conventional intranasal polypectomy in patients with nasal polyposis
publisher Rawalpindi Medical University
series Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
issn 1683-3562
1683-3570
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Background : To Compare the efficacy of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) with Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy in patients with nasal polyposis Methods: In this comparative study patients with sino-polyposis were divided into two groups Group-A was allotted to FESS and Group-B to the patients with conventional endoscopic endonasal-polypectomy. All patients,after surgery,were followed till 4 months for efficacy. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for qualitative variable i.e. gender and efficacy. Chi square test was applied to compare the significant difference regarding efficacy of both groups. p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Stratification was done for age and gender of the patients and duration of the disease to control the effect modifiers. Post stratification chi-square test was applied. Results: In group A, the efficacy was found n 82.67% whereas in group B the efficacy was observed in 61.33%. By using chi-square test, the significant association was found between study group and efficacy having p- value = 0.004. Conclusion: Efficacy was significantly higher in the FESS group as compared to conventional intranasal polypectomy in patients with sinonasal polyposis.
topic Sinonasal Polyposis
Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery FESS
Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy.
url https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/922
work_keys_str_mv AT syedjawadhussainshahetal comparisonofefficacyoffessfunctionalendoscopicsinussurgeryversusconventionalintranasalpolypectomyinpatientswithnasalpolyposis
_version_ 1724674939279114240