Prevalence of dyslipidemia in urban and rural India: the ICMR-INDIAB study.

AIM: To study the pattern and prevalence of dyslipidemia in a large representative sample of four selected regions in India. METHODS: Phase I of the Indian Council of Medical Research-India Diabetes (ICMR-INDIAB) study was conducted in a representative population of three states of India [Tamil Nadu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shashank R Joshi, Ranjit Mohan Anjana, Mohan Deepa, Rajendra Pradeepa, Anil Bhansali, Vinay K Dhandania, Prashant P Joshi, Ranjit Unnikrishnan, Elangovan Nirmal, Radhakrishnan Subashini, Sri Venkata Madhu, Paturi Vishnupriya Rao, Ashok Kumar Das, Tanvir Kaur, Deepak Kumar Shukla, Viswanathan Mohan, ICMR-INDIAB Collaborative Study Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4016101?pdf=render
id doaj-ebf3835c9f57458b8be6e8a5925a935c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ebf3835c9f57458b8be6e8a5925a935c2020-11-25T01:56:04ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0195e9680810.1371/journal.pone.0096808Prevalence of dyslipidemia in urban and rural India: the ICMR-INDIAB study.Shashank R JoshiRanjit Mohan AnjanaMohan DeepaRajendra PradeepaAnil BhansaliVinay K DhandaniaPrashant P JoshiRanjit UnnikrishnanElangovan NirmalRadhakrishnan SubashiniSri Venkata MadhuPaturi Vishnupriya RaoAshok Kumar DasTanvir KaurDeepak Kumar ShuklaViswanathan MohanICMR-INDIAB Collaborative Study GroupAIM: To study the pattern and prevalence of dyslipidemia in a large representative sample of four selected regions in India. METHODS: Phase I of the Indian Council of Medical Research-India Diabetes (ICMR-INDIAB) study was conducted in a representative population of three states of India [Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra and Jharkhand] and one Union Territory [Chandigarh], and covered a population of 213 million people using stratified multistage sampling design to recruit individuals ≥20 years of age. All the study subjects (n = 16,607) underwent anthropometric measurements and oral glucose tolerance tests were done using capillary blood (except in self-reported diabetes). In addition, in every 5th subject (n = 2042), a fasting venous sample was collected and assayed for lipids. Dyslipidemia was diagnosed using National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP) guidelines. RESULTS: Of the subjects studied, 13.9% had hypercholesterolemia, 29.5% had hypertriglyceridemia, 72.3% had low HDL-C, 11.8% had high LDL-C levels and 79% had abnormalities in one of the lipid parameters. Regional disparity exists with the highest rates of hypercholesterolemia observed in Tamilnadu (18.3%), highest rates of hypertriglyceridemia in Chandigarh (38.6%), highest rates of low HDL-C in Jharkhand (76.8%) and highest rates of high LDL-C in Tamilnadu (15.8%). Except for low HDL-C and in the state of Maharashtra, in all other states, urban residents had the highest prevalence of lipid abnormalities compared to rural residents. Low HDL-C was the most common lipid abnormality (72.3%) in all the four regions studied; in 44.9% of subjects, it was present as an isolated abnormality. Common significant risk factors for dyslipidemia included obesity, diabetes, and dysglycemia. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of dyslipidemia is very high in India, which calls for urgent lifestyle intervention strategies to prevent and manage this important cardiovascular risk factor.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4016101?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shashank R Joshi
Ranjit Mohan Anjana
Mohan Deepa
Rajendra Pradeepa
Anil Bhansali
Vinay K Dhandania
Prashant P Joshi
Ranjit Unnikrishnan
Elangovan Nirmal
Radhakrishnan Subashini
Sri Venkata Madhu
Paturi Vishnupriya Rao
Ashok Kumar Das
Tanvir Kaur
Deepak Kumar Shukla
Viswanathan Mohan
ICMR-INDIAB Collaborative Study Group
spellingShingle Shashank R Joshi
Ranjit Mohan Anjana
Mohan Deepa
Rajendra Pradeepa
Anil Bhansali
Vinay K Dhandania
Prashant P Joshi
Ranjit Unnikrishnan
Elangovan Nirmal
Radhakrishnan Subashini
Sri Venkata Madhu
Paturi Vishnupriya Rao
Ashok Kumar Das
Tanvir Kaur
Deepak Kumar Shukla
Viswanathan Mohan
ICMR-INDIAB Collaborative Study Group
Prevalence of dyslipidemia in urban and rural India: the ICMR-INDIAB study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Shashank R Joshi
Ranjit Mohan Anjana
Mohan Deepa
Rajendra Pradeepa
Anil Bhansali
Vinay K Dhandania
Prashant P Joshi
Ranjit Unnikrishnan
Elangovan Nirmal
Radhakrishnan Subashini
Sri Venkata Madhu
Paturi Vishnupriya Rao
Ashok Kumar Das
Tanvir Kaur
Deepak Kumar Shukla
Viswanathan Mohan
ICMR-INDIAB Collaborative Study Group
author_sort Shashank R Joshi
title Prevalence of dyslipidemia in urban and rural India: the ICMR-INDIAB study.
title_short Prevalence of dyslipidemia in urban and rural India: the ICMR-INDIAB study.
title_full Prevalence of dyslipidemia in urban and rural India: the ICMR-INDIAB study.
title_fullStr Prevalence of dyslipidemia in urban and rural India: the ICMR-INDIAB study.
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of dyslipidemia in urban and rural India: the ICMR-INDIAB study.
title_sort prevalence of dyslipidemia in urban and rural india: the icmr-indiab study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description AIM: To study the pattern and prevalence of dyslipidemia in a large representative sample of four selected regions in India. METHODS: Phase I of the Indian Council of Medical Research-India Diabetes (ICMR-INDIAB) study was conducted in a representative population of three states of India [Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra and Jharkhand] and one Union Territory [Chandigarh], and covered a population of 213 million people using stratified multistage sampling design to recruit individuals ≥20 years of age. All the study subjects (n = 16,607) underwent anthropometric measurements and oral glucose tolerance tests were done using capillary blood (except in self-reported diabetes). In addition, in every 5th subject (n = 2042), a fasting venous sample was collected and assayed for lipids. Dyslipidemia was diagnosed using National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP) guidelines. RESULTS: Of the subjects studied, 13.9% had hypercholesterolemia, 29.5% had hypertriglyceridemia, 72.3% had low HDL-C, 11.8% had high LDL-C levels and 79% had abnormalities in one of the lipid parameters. Regional disparity exists with the highest rates of hypercholesterolemia observed in Tamilnadu (18.3%), highest rates of hypertriglyceridemia in Chandigarh (38.6%), highest rates of low HDL-C in Jharkhand (76.8%) and highest rates of high LDL-C in Tamilnadu (15.8%). Except for low HDL-C and in the state of Maharashtra, in all other states, urban residents had the highest prevalence of lipid abnormalities compared to rural residents. Low HDL-C was the most common lipid abnormality (72.3%) in all the four regions studied; in 44.9% of subjects, it was present as an isolated abnormality. Common significant risk factors for dyslipidemia included obesity, diabetes, and dysglycemia. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of dyslipidemia is very high in India, which calls for urgent lifestyle intervention strategies to prevent and manage this important cardiovascular risk factor.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4016101?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT shashankrjoshi prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT ranjitmohananjana prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT mohandeepa prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT rajendrapradeepa prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT anilbhansali prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT vinaykdhandania prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT prashantpjoshi prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT ranjitunnikrishnan prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT elangovannirmal prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT radhakrishnansubashini prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT srivenkatamadhu prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT paturivishnupriyarao prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT ashokkumardas prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT tanvirkaur prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT deepakkumarshukla prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT viswanathanmohan prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
AT icmrindiabcollaborativestudygroup prevalenceofdyslipidemiainurbanandruralindiatheicmrindiabstudy
_version_ 1724981775030026240