Intranasal midazolam sedation as an effective sedation route in pediatric patients for radiologic imaging in the emergency ward: A single-blind randomized trial

OBJECTIVES: Prevention and reduction of pain, anxiety, and fear during medical procedures is one of the most important factors that should be considered in pediatric emergencies. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral versus intranasal midazolam in sedation during radiologic imagi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masoud Mayel, Mehdi Ahmadi Nejad, Mehdi Sadeghi Khabaz, Maliheh Sadat Bazrafshani, Ehsan Mohajeri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.turkjemergmed.org/article.asp?issn=2452-2473;year=2020;volume=20;issue=4;spage=168;epage=174;aulast=Mayel
id doaj-ebf7e1bb4cd64f749f7930c271f11d83
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ebf7e1bb4cd64f749f7930c271f11d832021-02-03T07:14:45ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsTurkish Journal of Emergency Medicine2452-24732452-24732020-01-0120416817410.4103/2452-2473.297461Intranasal midazolam sedation as an effective sedation route in pediatric patients for radiologic imaging in the emergency ward: A single-blind randomized trialMasoud MayelMehdi Ahmadi NejadMehdi Sadeghi KhabazMaliheh Sadat BazrafshaniEhsan MohajeriOBJECTIVES: Prevention and reduction of pain, anxiety, and fear during medical procedures is one of the most important factors that should be considered in pediatric emergencies. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral versus intranasal midazolam in sedation during radiologic imaging in the largest province of Iran, Kerman. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty children were enrolled in this single-blind clinical trial based on convenience sampling and were divided into two groups receiving 0.5 mg/kg midazolam in oral route administration and 0.2 mg/kg midazolam in intranasal route administration. Finally, 75 patients remained for evaluating medication acceptability, sedation level, onset time of sedation, additional sedative dose, adverse effects of sedation, and provider satisfaction. RESULTS: Children in the intranasal group accepted medication more easily (89.8% vs. 36.9%; P≤ 0.001), while these children received a lower sedation dose, but the sedation level in both methods was similar (P = 0.72). Our findings showed that children in the intranasal sedation group had a faster onset of sedation compared to the oral group (17.94 ± 8.99 vs. 34.50 ± 11.45; P≤ 0.001). The frequency of midazolam side effects had no difference between the groups (29.7% vs. 15.8%; P = 0.15). CONCLUSION: Intranasal midazolam with a lower sedation dose induces a faster onset and better acceptance. Intranasal midazolam can be used as an effective sedative method for pediatric patients, especially in emergency wards.http://www.turkjemergmed.org/article.asp?issn=2452-2473;year=2020;volume=20;issue=4;spage=168;epage=174;aulast=Mayelemergency wardintranasalmidazolamradiologic imaging
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Masoud Mayel
Mehdi Ahmadi Nejad
Mehdi Sadeghi Khabaz
Maliheh Sadat Bazrafshani
Ehsan Mohajeri
spellingShingle Masoud Mayel
Mehdi Ahmadi Nejad
Mehdi Sadeghi Khabaz
Maliheh Sadat Bazrafshani
Ehsan Mohajeri
Intranasal midazolam sedation as an effective sedation route in pediatric patients for radiologic imaging in the emergency ward: A single-blind randomized trial
Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine
emergency ward
intranasal
midazolam
radiologic imaging
author_facet Masoud Mayel
Mehdi Ahmadi Nejad
Mehdi Sadeghi Khabaz
Maliheh Sadat Bazrafshani
Ehsan Mohajeri
author_sort Masoud Mayel
title Intranasal midazolam sedation as an effective sedation route in pediatric patients for radiologic imaging in the emergency ward: A single-blind randomized trial
title_short Intranasal midazolam sedation as an effective sedation route in pediatric patients for radiologic imaging in the emergency ward: A single-blind randomized trial
title_full Intranasal midazolam sedation as an effective sedation route in pediatric patients for radiologic imaging in the emergency ward: A single-blind randomized trial
title_fullStr Intranasal midazolam sedation as an effective sedation route in pediatric patients for radiologic imaging in the emergency ward: A single-blind randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Intranasal midazolam sedation as an effective sedation route in pediatric patients for radiologic imaging in the emergency ward: A single-blind randomized trial
title_sort intranasal midazolam sedation as an effective sedation route in pediatric patients for radiologic imaging in the emergency ward: a single-blind randomized trial
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine
issn 2452-2473
2452-2473
publishDate 2020-01-01
description OBJECTIVES: Prevention and reduction of pain, anxiety, and fear during medical procedures is one of the most important factors that should be considered in pediatric emergencies. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of oral versus intranasal midazolam in sedation during radiologic imaging in the largest province of Iran, Kerman. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty children were enrolled in this single-blind clinical trial based on convenience sampling and were divided into two groups receiving 0.5 mg/kg midazolam in oral route administration and 0.2 mg/kg midazolam in intranasal route administration. Finally, 75 patients remained for evaluating medication acceptability, sedation level, onset time of sedation, additional sedative dose, adverse effects of sedation, and provider satisfaction. RESULTS: Children in the intranasal group accepted medication more easily (89.8% vs. 36.9%; P≤ 0.001), while these children received a lower sedation dose, but the sedation level in both methods was similar (P = 0.72). Our findings showed that children in the intranasal sedation group had a faster onset of sedation compared to the oral group (17.94 ± 8.99 vs. 34.50 ± 11.45; P≤ 0.001). The frequency of midazolam side effects had no difference between the groups (29.7% vs. 15.8%; P = 0.15). CONCLUSION: Intranasal midazolam with a lower sedation dose induces a faster onset and better acceptance. Intranasal midazolam can be used as an effective sedative method for pediatric patients, especially in emergency wards.
topic emergency ward
intranasal
midazolam
radiologic imaging
url http://www.turkjemergmed.org/article.asp?issn=2452-2473;year=2020;volume=20;issue=4;spage=168;epage=174;aulast=Mayel
work_keys_str_mv AT masoudmayel intranasalmidazolamsedationasaneffectivesedationrouteinpediatricpatientsforradiologicimagingintheemergencywardasingleblindrandomizedtrial
AT mehdiahmadinejad intranasalmidazolamsedationasaneffectivesedationrouteinpediatricpatientsforradiologicimagingintheemergencywardasingleblindrandomizedtrial
AT mehdisadeghikhabaz intranasalmidazolamsedationasaneffectivesedationrouteinpediatricpatientsforradiologicimagingintheemergencywardasingleblindrandomizedtrial
AT malihehsadatbazrafshani intranasalmidazolamsedationasaneffectivesedationrouteinpediatricpatientsforradiologicimagingintheemergencywardasingleblindrandomizedtrial
AT ehsanmohajeri intranasalmidazolamsedationasaneffectivesedationrouteinpediatricpatientsforradiologicimagingintheemergencywardasingleblindrandomizedtrial
_version_ 1724288272745627648