Comparison Study of Two Different Sun-Tracking Methods in Optical Efficiency of Heliostat Field

There are two sun-tracking methods widely used for the heliostat, which are conventional Azimuth-Elevation and revolutionary Spinning-Elevation methods. Following the previous study to compare the range of motion, a comparison study in optical efficiency of heliostat field for the two methods is fur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K.-K. Chong, M. H. Tan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Photoenergy
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/908364
id doaj-ec0023de9223442a951c8c5c5cfb488c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec0023de9223442a951c8c5c5cfb488c2020-11-24T21:40:57ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Photoenergy1110-662X1687-529X2012-01-01201210.1155/2012/908364908364Comparison Study of Two Different Sun-Tracking Methods in Optical Efficiency of Heliostat FieldK.-K. Chong0M. H. Tan1Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Off Jalan Genting Kelang, Setapak, 53300 Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaFaculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Off Jalan Genting Kelang, Setapak, 53300 Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaThere are two sun-tracking methods widely used for the heliostat, which are conventional Azimuth-Elevation and revolutionary Spinning-Elevation methods. Following the previous study to compare the range of motion, a comparison study in optical efficiency of heliostat field for the two methods is further explored in this paper. A special algorithm using ray-tracing technique has also been developed to simulate the optical efficiency of heliostat field for both sun-tracking methods in different latitudes. With the new algorithm, comprehensive analysis to compare the optical efficiency of individual heliostat and the overall heliostat field for the two sun-tracking methods has been carried out.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/908364
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K.-K. Chong
M. H. Tan
spellingShingle K.-K. Chong
M. H. Tan
Comparison Study of Two Different Sun-Tracking Methods in Optical Efficiency of Heliostat Field
International Journal of Photoenergy
author_facet K.-K. Chong
M. H. Tan
author_sort K.-K. Chong
title Comparison Study of Two Different Sun-Tracking Methods in Optical Efficiency of Heliostat Field
title_short Comparison Study of Two Different Sun-Tracking Methods in Optical Efficiency of Heliostat Field
title_full Comparison Study of Two Different Sun-Tracking Methods in Optical Efficiency of Heliostat Field
title_fullStr Comparison Study of Two Different Sun-Tracking Methods in Optical Efficiency of Heliostat Field
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Study of Two Different Sun-Tracking Methods in Optical Efficiency of Heliostat Field
title_sort comparison study of two different sun-tracking methods in optical efficiency of heliostat field
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Photoenergy
issn 1110-662X
1687-529X
publishDate 2012-01-01
description There are two sun-tracking methods widely used for the heliostat, which are conventional Azimuth-Elevation and revolutionary Spinning-Elevation methods. Following the previous study to compare the range of motion, a comparison study in optical efficiency of heliostat field for the two methods is further explored in this paper. A special algorithm using ray-tracing technique has also been developed to simulate the optical efficiency of heliostat field for both sun-tracking methods in different latitudes. With the new algorithm, comprehensive analysis to compare the optical efficiency of individual heliostat and the overall heliostat field for the two sun-tracking methods has been carried out.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/908364
work_keys_str_mv AT kkchong comparisonstudyoftwodifferentsuntrackingmethodsinopticalefficiencyofheliostatfield
AT mhtan comparisonstudyoftwodifferentsuntrackingmethodsinopticalefficiencyofheliostatfield
_version_ 1725923772248096768