Comparison of crestal bone loss around submerged and Non- submerged replace implants

"nBackground and Aim: It is well recognized that implant treatment is common worldwide, but the approach to success is not predictable because of bone loss that occurs around the implants. Also there are many factors affecting crestal bone loss around the implants that one of them is the su...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Panjnosh M., Siadat H., AliKhasi M., AliHoseini M.
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2009-11-01
Series:Journal of Dental Medicine
Subjects:
RVG
Online Access:http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/14622.pdf&manuscript_id=14622
id doaj-ec0713b36c294753b59239a4ff0f743c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec0713b36c294753b59239a4ff0f743c2020-11-25T00:48:40ZfasTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Medicine1024-641X2008-24442009-11-01222116124Comparison of crestal bone loss around submerged and Non- submerged replace implantsPanjnosh M.Siadat H.AliKhasi M.AliHoseini M."nBackground and Aim: It is well recognized that implant treatment is common worldwide, but the approach to success is not predictable because of bone loss that occurs around the implants. Also there are many factors affecting crestal bone loss around the implants that one of them is the surgical protocol of implant installation. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the amount of crestal bone loss around the Replace implants installed according to submerged and non- submerged treatment protocol. "nMaterials and Methods: In this study, 11 patients received 34 implants. In each patient (unilateral or bilateral mandible), one of the implants was placed with submerged procedure and in the other one non- submerged procedure was used. In a period of 3 months a temporary partial denture that covered the implants was used. After 3 months the submerged fixture was exposed, impression was performed and fixed prosthesis was fabricated. Loss of crestal bone at each implant was measured. These measurements have been done at surgical times, over a period of 3 months after implant installation and 6 months after the delivery of the fixed prosthesis. The measurement was done with digital subtraction radiography. Data was analyzed by Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. "nResults: Three months after implant placement, submerged groups showed statistically more crestal bone loss (0.65±0.71) than non-submerged (0.41±0.53) group (p=0.02). After 6 months the mean value of crestal bone loss in submerged group was 0.21±0.40 mm and in non submerged group was 0.29±0.49 mm. This data indicated no statistically significant difference between the two groups of implants (p>0.05). "n "nConclusion: Our results are in accordance with previously published studies and confirm that the value of crestal bone loss in submerged and non-submerged groups after 3 and 6 months were similar and in acceptable limit. http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/14622.pdf&manuscript_id=14622Dental ImplantsMarginal Bone LossSubmerge and Non submergeDigital SubtractionRVG
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Panjnosh M.
Siadat H.
AliKhasi M.
AliHoseini M.
spellingShingle Panjnosh M.
Siadat H.
AliKhasi M.
AliHoseini M.
Comparison of crestal bone loss around submerged and Non- submerged replace implants
Journal of Dental Medicine
Dental Implants
Marginal Bone Loss
Submerge and Non submerge
Digital Subtraction
RVG
author_facet Panjnosh M.
Siadat H.
AliKhasi M.
AliHoseini M.
author_sort Panjnosh M.
title Comparison of crestal bone loss around submerged and Non- submerged replace implants
title_short Comparison of crestal bone loss around submerged and Non- submerged replace implants
title_full Comparison of crestal bone loss around submerged and Non- submerged replace implants
title_fullStr Comparison of crestal bone loss around submerged and Non- submerged replace implants
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of crestal bone loss around submerged and Non- submerged replace implants
title_sort comparison of crestal bone loss around submerged and non- submerged replace implants
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Dental Medicine
issn 1024-641X
2008-2444
publishDate 2009-11-01
description "nBackground and Aim: It is well recognized that implant treatment is common worldwide, but the approach to success is not predictable because of bone loss that occurs around the implants. Also there are many factors affecting crestal bone loss around the implants that one of them is the surgical protocol of implant installation. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the amount of crestal bone loss around the Replace implants installed according to submerged and non- submerged treatment protocol. "nMaterials and Methods: In this study, 11 patients received 34 implants. In each patient (unilateral or bilateral mandible), one of the implants was placed with submerged procedure and in the other one non- submerged procedure was used. In a period of 3 months a temporary partial denture that covered the implants was used. After 3 months the submerged fixture was exposed, impression was performed and fixed prosthesis was fabricated. Loss of crestal bone at each implant was measured. These measurements have been done at surgical times, over a period of 3 months after implant installation and 6 months after the delivery of the fixed prosthesis. The measurement was done with digital subtraction radiography. Data was analyzed by Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. "nResults: Three months after implant placement, submerged groups showed statistically more crestal bone loss (0.65±0.71) than non-submerged (0.41±0.53) group (p=0.02). After 6 months the mean value of crestal bone loss in submerged group was 0.21±0.40 mm and in non submerged group was 0.29±0.49 mm. This data indicated no statistically significant difference between the two groups of implants (p>0.05). "n "nConclusion: Our results are in accordance with previously published studies and confirm that the value of crestal bone loss in submerged and non-submerged groups after 3 and 6 months were similar and in acceptable limit.
topic Dental Implants
Marginal Bone Loss
Submerge and Non submerge
Digital Subtraction
RVG
url http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/14622.pdf&manuscript_id=14622
work_keys_str_mv AT panjnoshm comparisonofcrestalbonelossaroundsubmergedandnonsubmergedreplaceimplants
AT siadath comparisonofcrestalbonelossaroundsubmergedandnonsubmergedreplaceimplants
AT alikhasim comparisonofcrestalbonelossaroundsubmergedandnonsubmergedreplaceimplants
AT alihoseinim comparisonofcrestalbonelossaroundsubmergedandnonsubmergedreplaceimplants
_version_ 1725255016590082048