Aesthetic and Spiritual Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Sacred Sites

The range and use of ecosystem services provided by urban sacred sites has hardly been considered in studies of urban ecology, sustainability and human wellbeing. This paper examines the perceived ecosystem services supplied by green spaces or gardens associated with places of religious worship and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter De Lacy, Charlie Shackleton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-09-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1628
id doaj-ec51117bbb9a41e689e4c0b4b6474603
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec51117bbb9a41e689e4c0b4b64746032020-11-24T23:04:36ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502017-09-0199162810.3390/su9091628su9091628Aesthetic and Spiritual Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Sacred SitesPeter De Lacy0Charlie Shackleton1Department of Environmental Science, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140, South AfricaDepartment of Environmental Science, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140, South AfricaThe range and use of ecosystem services provided by urban sacred sites has hardly been considered in studies of urban ecology, sustainability and human wellbeing. This paper examines the perceived ecosystem services supplied by green spaces or gardens associated with places of religious worship and appreciated by worshippers in a mid-sized town in South Africa. A questionnaire with open, closed and Likert scale questions was administered at 30 places of worship (25 with gardens and five without). Respondents identified a wide diversity of ecosystem services provided by gardens, with social ones being more recognized than ecological, and economic services the least. Approximately two-thirds of respondents visited a sacred site garden weekly or more often. The majority of respondents (96%) felt that a garden was necessary because it added to their feelings of connection with God, or helped them relax and so be better able to concentrate, and 54% stated that a garden enhanced their overall spiritual experience. Regression analysis revealed that aesthetic appreciation of a garden was significantly related to woody plant species richness, number and basal area in the garden. On the other hand, spiritual experience was positively related to woody plant basal area, but not species richness nor tree number. Neither size of the garden, nor number of years the respondents had been vising a particular sacred site had any influence on the rated spiritual or aesthetic experiences. These results reveal the widely appreciated ecosystem services provided by urban sacred spaces and their centrality in enhancing spiritual satisfaction for some.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1628church gardenscultural servicesplant abundancespecies richnessspiritual services
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter De Lacy
Charlie Shackleton
spellingShingle Peter De Lacy
Charlie Shackleton
Aesthetic and Spiritual Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Sacred Sites
Sustainability
church gardens
cultural services
plant abundance
species richness
spiritual services
author_facet Peter De Lacy
Charlie Shackleton
author_sort Peter De Lacy
title Aesthetic and Spiritual Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Sacred Sites
title_short Aesthetic and Spiritual Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Sacred Sites
title_full Aesthetic and Spiritual Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Sacred Sites
title_fullStr Aesthetic and Spiritual Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Sacred Sites
title_full_unstemmed Aesthetic and Spiritual Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Sacred Sites
title_sort aesthetic and spiritual ecosystem services provided by urban sacred sites
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2017-09-01
description The range and use of ecosystem services provided by urban sacred sites has hardly been considered in studies of urban ecology, sustainability and human wellbeing. This paper examines the perceived ecosystem services supplied by green spaces or gardens associated with places of religious worship and appreciated by worshippers in a mid-sized town in South Africa. A questionnaire with open, closed and Likert scale questions was administered at 30 places of worship (25 with gardens and five without). Respondents identified a wide diversity of ecosystem services provided by gardens, with social ones being more recognized than ecological, and economic services the least. Approximately two-thirds of respondents visited a sacred site garden weekly or more often. The majority of respondents (96%) felt that a garden was necessary because it added to their feelings of connection with God, or helped them relax and so be better able to concentrate, and 54% stated that a garden enhanced their overall spiritual experience. Regression analysis revealed that aesthetic appreciation of a garden was significantly related to woody plant species richness, number and basal area in the garden. On the other hand, spiritual experience was positively related to woody plant basal area, but not species richness nor tree number. Neither size of the garden, nor number of years the respondents had been vising a particular sacred site had any influence on the rated spiritual or aesthetic experiences. These results reveal the widely appreciated ecosystem services provided by urban sacred spaces and their centrality in enhancing spiritual satisfaction for some.
topic church gardens
cultural services
plant abundance
species richness
spiritual services
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/9/1628
work_keys_str_mv AT peterdelacy aestheticandspiritualecosystemservicesprovidedbyurbansacredsites
AT charlieshackleton aestheticandspiritualecosystemservicesprovidedbyurbansacredsites
_version_ 1725629608101937152