O debate dos desencontros: uma avaliação das críticas de Michal Sandel ao liberalismo de John Rawls

The main objective of Micheal Sandel’s Liberalism and the Limits of Justice was to attack the concept of deontology, as formulated by John Rawls. In this article, I argue that Sandel interpreted the concept of deontology in a misleading way. There is a difference between how Rawls defined this conce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Flávio Azevedo Reis
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal do Paraná 2013-04-01
Series:DoisPontos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs/index.php/doispontos/article/view/30454/20916
id doaj-ec8e90e82d7d474c9a70ddab270ec3ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec8e90e82d7d474c9a70ddab270ec3ce2021-04-02T17:09:43ZporUniversidade Federal do ParanáDoisPontos1807-38832179-74122013-04-01101618110.5380/dp.v10i1.30454O debate dos desencontros: uma avaliação das críticas de Michal Sandel ao liberalismo de John RawlsFlávio Azevedo Reis0Universidade do Estado de São Paulo (USP)The main objective of Micheal Sandel’s Liberalism and the Limits of Justice was to attack the concept of deontology, as formulated by John Rawls. In this article, I argue that Sandel interpreted the concept of deontology in a misleading way. There is a difference between how Rawls defined this concept and how it was interpreted by Sandel. Given this, the first part of this article will analyze the way Sandel interpreted the Rawlsian concept of deontology. The second part presents an assessment of the clash between the two authors in light of the differences in the way both of them understood the meaning of deontology in political liberalism.http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs/index.php/doispontos/article/view/30454/20916LiberalismCommunitarismJohn RawlsMichael SandelDeontologyTheory of Justice
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Flávio Azevedo Reis
spellingShingle Flávio Azevedo Reis
O debate dos desencontros: uma avaliação das críticas de Michal Sandel ao liberalismo de John Rawls
DoisPontos
Liberalism
Communitarism
John Rawls
Michael Sandel
Deontology
Theory of Justice
author_facet Flávio Azevedo Reis
author_sort Flávio Azevedo Reis
title O debate dos desencontros: uma avaliação das críticas de Michal Sandel ao liberalismo de John Rawls
title_short O debate dos desencontros: uma avaliação das críticas de Michal Sandel ao liberalismo de John Rawls
title_full O debate dos desencontros: uma avaliação das críticas de Michal Sandel ao liberalismo de John Rawls
title_fullStr O debate dos desencontros: uma avaliação das críticas de Michal Sandel ao liberalismo de John Rawls
title_full_unstemmed O debate dos desencontros: uma avaliação das críticas de Michal Sandel ao liberalismo de John Rawls
title_sort o debate dos desencontros: uma avaliação das críticas de michal sandel ao liberalismo de john rawls
publisher Universidade Federal do Paraná
series DoisPontos
issn 1807-3883
2179-7412
publishDate 2013-04-01
description The main objective of Micheal Sandel’s Liberalism and the Limits of Justice was to attack the concept of deontology, as formulated by John Rawls. In this article, I argue that Sandel interpreted the concept of deontology in a misleading way. There is a difference between how Rawls defined this concept and how it was interpreted by Sandel. Given this, the first part of this article will analyze the way Sandel interpreted the Rawlsian concept of deontology. The second part presents an assessment of the clash between the two authors in light of the differences in the way both of them understood the meaning of deontology in political liberalism.
topic Liberalism
Communitarism
John Rawls
Michael Sandel
Deontology
Theory of Justice
url http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs/index.php/doispontos/article/view/30454/20916
work_keys_str_mv AT flavioazevedoreis odebatedosdesencontrosumaavaliacaodascriticasdemichalsandelaoliberalismodejohnrawls
_version_ 1721554584987500544